End 1,400 Years of Terror

There are sensible ways to tackle Islamic terrorism and make the future safer for the world. The problem is not that there are no solutions. The problem is that politicians are not bothered to act. They are unwilling to implement what it takes to end MUSLIM ISLAMIC terrorism once and for all, and undo the damages poor political policies have caused:

  • Islam must be made illegal and defined as a foreign fascist ideology, not a religion.
  • Ban and demolish all mosques. Every single mosque in the West collect donations ‘for Muslim causes’. Jihad is the core foundation of Islam and a duty for every single Muslim. Each and every mosque goer is expected to contribute in some way or the other.
  • Joining terrorism, committing terrorist acts, supporting and recruiting for jihad is an act of treason and should be sanctioned by capital punishment.
  • Ban and punish any and all arms trade with Muslim countries.
  • Ban all aid contributions to Muslims. There is no need for the West to contribute aid.
  • Ban the Koran and burn them; block the content from being accessed online.
  • Halal tortured meat, a major funding source towards terrorism, must be fully and completely banned.
  • Remove all practicing and religious Muslims from the West. Completely. Deport them by canceling residency, revoking passports, and cancelling visas on basis of incompatibility and ineligibility.
  • Countries that refuse / block to take Muslim immigrants back to their own countries need to be fined and sanctioned. Muslims deported to their home countries should be booked on a one-way flight, disembarked in their homeland and left at the airport for local officials to deal with. It is irrelevant if the countries will accept to take them back or not: that option to chose should not be obligatory. Refusal should be heavily fined.
  • Ban all trade with and from the Muslim (majority and ruling) world.
  • Ban all travels to and from the Muslim world.
  • All sales of properties owned by Muslims in the West need to be revoked of all ownership. The properties should be resold at market value. Funds should be used to cover the losses caused by Muslim immigration (welfare, housing, prison system, healthcare, security) and the massive bill for legal costs, law enforcement, national intelligence, etc., for the removal of Muslims from Western society and the elimination of Islam.
  • Ban all banking and payments to and from the Muslim (majority and ruling) world to other non-Muslim countries.
  • Ban all investments to and from the Muslim world.
  • All “charitable” funding and accounts raised by Islamic organizations in the West are to be frozen. Funds should be allocated to the government for tackling Islamic terrorism.
  • End the entire oil trade with the Muslims. The oil trade continues to be an endless source of Islamic terrorism.
  • Sanctions on Muslim countries from trading in oil to non-Muslim nations should be made active until a total trade ban is put in place. (We need a permanent replacement for oil for all our energy needs).
  • Muslims who are in prison in the West, before they are deported, must be separated from non-Muslims. No special privileges for gatherings, prayer meetings, food, mingling or religion are to be provided
  • Muslim charged with plotting, planning or committing terrorism should be executed. As an option, a bilateral agreement can be signed with Saudi Arabia to execute them sharia-style by beheading.
  • Muslims must be permanently banned from any jobs within law enforcement, immigration, government.
  • Borders must be protected with three levels of boundaries with clear warnings within each boundary. Illegals forcing their way into the third boundary to be shot on forced entry at their own volition.

102 thoughts on “End 1,400 Years of Terror

  1. Well said, Moslims additionally need to be segregated by sex and cloistered into a few mid east countries. Moslim men need to be castrated and the females need to be sterilized. Moslims that will not convert honestly and completely toChristianity need to be executed immediately. No later than May 31, 2017. Moslims are inbred, mentally retarded and live by Taqīyyah (تقيّة).

    Like

    • How about luxurious Hawaii!?

      Is Father Damien’s resort still available?

      Boatless, upon an island surrounded by tiger sharks. satisfies the security issue. The problem is, it’s too nice for them.

      Maybe France will make a deal on Devil’s Island.

      Maybe, we should have a write-in contest. What the fuck do we do with an American gullible enough, brutal enough, and selfish enough to become a practicing Muslim? And, no, conversion to a fertilizer product is not a moral option. Not that they wouldn’t hesitate.

      I just don’t want them here, with their absurd plotting and inevitable blood-baths.

      And if we don’t want them here, we can put on our thinking caps and democratically decide their disposition.

      Like

      • “absurd plotting” uno i think we would all be dead right now you guys really don’t like logic huh also stats 18% of muslims in america are native born caucasians ❤ you seem to be exactly like the psychopaths you hate how ironic

        Like

      • i think we need people with degrees without bias to study this ‘issue” i see a lot of rep tweeting shit like this but with false sources or clouded judgement its a repeat of history there is something clearly wrong I’m muslim Iraqi and america needs to stop riding arab gulf countries cause theres deffo an agenda here with daesh and all that plus the stuff I’m reading on this blog I’ve never heard about in my life so I’m still surprised

        Like

      • also im 20/10 sure this isn’t how it works Bosnia tried it with their muslim genocide before seems like it caused more problems

        Like

      • if trump takes them out we arabs give him permission to all the oil he finds <33333 and right lol saudi arabia out of all countries is the head of human rights in the UN now while they still have a migrant worker problem and male guardianship laws thats the funniest thing like ever…i was thinking about joining the UN for my HS volunteer hours but nvm anything thats backed by saudis is inherently evil

        Like

  2. One way to stop Islam is to provide an alternative religion for Muslims to adapt. Today many educated Muslims want to leave Islam but are afraid that they will be killed by their fellow religionists. By adapting the Sanatana way of life they can overcome their dilemma as by adapting the Sanatana way of life they need not change their name, diet, customs or undergo purification ceremonies; or say prayer in an alien language or visit places of worship; all these which attract the attention of their neighbours. As non-Muslims we have a moral obligation to spread this message and help liberate Muslims http://ilovesanatanadharma.blogspot.in/

    Like

  3. but islamic country are rich. saudi was famous for their kabah, it gave them more money than oil. if the muslim exist, the saudi will keep the money in the bank because kabbah visiting is a MUST.
    therefore, saudi will keep become rich country except you eliminate : -kabah
    -oil
    which are impossible
    So, yes… they will keep being rich and keep be an influental country

    Like

  4. LETS BAN ALL MUSLIM ON THIS PLANET KNOWN AS EARTH..

    IF THEIR ‘ALLAH’ WANTS TO HELP THEM AND RULE THIS PLANET…

    LETS SEE WHERE IS ALLAH. LET HIM COME TO SAVE THEM..

    BRING IT ON!!!

    Like

    • LETS BAN ALL MUSLIM ON THIS PLANET KNOWN AS EARTH..

      IF THEIR ‘ALLAH’ WANTS TO HELP THEM AND RULE THIS PLANET…

      LETS SEE WHERE IS ALLAH. LET HIM COME TO SAVE THEM..

      BRING IT ON!!!

      Like

  5. The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called ‘hypocrites’ and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

    Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, the verses of violence in the Quran are mostly open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text (although many Muslims choose to think of them that way). They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subject to interpretation as anything else in the Quran.

    The context of violent passages is more ambiguous than might be expected of a perfect book from a loving God. Most contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to interpret their holy book’s call to arms according to their own moral preconceptions about justifiable violence. Their apologists cater to these preferences with tenuous arguments that gloss over historical fact and generally do not stand up to scrutiny. Still, it is important to note that the problem is not bad people, but bad ideology.

    Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed. Muhammad’s own martial legacy, along with the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran, have produced a trail of blood and tears across world history.

    The Quran:

    Quran (2:191-193) – “And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing…

    but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone. But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)” (Translation is from the Noble Quran) The verse prior to this (190) refers to “fighting for the cause of Allah those who fight you” leading some to believe that the entire passage refers to a defensive war in which Muslims are defending their homes and families. The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, however, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries. In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did). Verse 190 thus means to fight those who offer resistance to Allah’s rule (ie. Muslim conquest). The use of the word “persecution” by some Muslim translators is disingenuous (the actual Arabic words for persecution – “idtihad” – and oppression – a variation of “z-l-m” – do not appear in the verse). The word used instead, “fitna”, can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation. This is certainly what is meant in this context since the violence is explicitly commissioned “until religion is for Allah” – ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

    Quran (2:244) – “Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”

    Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

    Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

    Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”. This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).

    Quran (4:74) – “Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.” The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. This is the theological basis for today’s suicide bombers.

    Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”

    Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

    Quran (4:95) – “Not equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame, etc.), and those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with their wealth and their lives. Allah has preferred in grades those who strive hard and fight with their wealth and their lives above those who sit (at home). Unto each, Allah has promised good (Paradise), but Allah has preferred those who strive hard and fight, above those who sit (at home) by a huge reward ” This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is this Arabic word (mujahiduna) used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad, which would not make sense if it meant an internal struggle).

    Quran (4:104) – “And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…” Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

    Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

    Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

    Quran (8:15) – “O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.”

    Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah” Some translations interpret “fitna” as “persecution”, but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for 2:193). The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj. Other Muslims were allowed to travel there – just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for Allah”, meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition. According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that “Allah must have no rivals.”

    Quran (8:57) – “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

    Quran (8:67) – “It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land…”

    Quran (8:59-60) – “And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.”

    Quran (8:65) – “O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight…”

    Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion’s Five Pillars). This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack. Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months). The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat. Once the Muslims had power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

    Quran (9:14) – “Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people.” Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even “healing” the hearts of Muslims.

    Quran (9:20) – “Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” The Arabic word interpreted as “striving” in this verse is the same root as “Jihad”. The context is obviously holy war.

    Quran (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status. Verse 9:33 tells Muslims that Allah has charted them to make Islam “superior over all religions.” This chapter was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.

    Quran (9:30) – “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”

    Quran (9:38-39) – “O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.” This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

    Quran (9:41) – “Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” See also the verse that follows (9:42) – “If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them” This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).

    Quran (9:73) – “O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.” Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today’s devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

    Quran (9:88) – “But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper.”

    Quran (9:111) – “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.” How does the Quran define a true believer?

    Quran (9:123) – “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.”

    Quran (17:16) – “And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction.” Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is “utter destruction.” (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

    Quran (18:65-81) – This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with “special knowledge” who does things which don’t seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would “grieve” his parents by “disobedience and ingratitude.” He was killed so that Allah could provide them a ‘better’ son. (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia. Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

    Quran (21:44) – “We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?”

    Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness…” “Strive against” is Jihad – obviously not in the personal context. It’s also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

    Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.” This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered “merciless” and “horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah” (3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with “diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and “alarmists” or “agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad’s biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today’s terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah’s eternal word to Muslim generations.

    Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord… So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)… If it had been Allah’s Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost.” Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad. The wounded are to be held captive for ransom. The only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test.

    Quran (47:35) – “Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you,”

    Quran (48:17) – “There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom.” Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted? This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

    Quran (48:29) – “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves” Islam is not about treating everyone equally. This verse tells Muslims that there are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status. Also the word used for ‘hard’ or ‘ruthless’ in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as ‘painful’ or severe’ to describe Hell in over 25 other verses including 65:10, 40:46 and 50:26..

    Quran (61:4) – “Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way” Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to “battle array” meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict. This is followed by (61:9): “He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist.” (See next verse, below). Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

    Quran (61:10-12) – “O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of ‘Adn – Eternity [‘Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success.” This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above). It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

    Quran (66:9) – “O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey’s end.” The root word of “Jihad” is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include “hypocrites” – those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

    Other verses calling Muslims to Jihad can be found here at AnsweringIslam.org

    From the Hadith:
    Bukhari (52:177) – Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

    Bukhari (52:256) – The Prophet… was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, “They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans).” In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings.

    Bukhari (52:65) – The Prophet said, ‘He who fights that Allah’s Word, Islam, should be superior, fights in Allah’s Cause. Muhammad’s words are the basis for offensive Jihad – spreading Islam by force. This is how it was understood by his companions, and by the terrorists of today.

    Bukhari (52:220) – Allah’s Apostle said… ‘I have been made victorious with terror’

    Abu Dawud (14:2526) – The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)

    Abu Dawud (14:2527) – The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious

    Muslim (1:33) – the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

    Bukhari (8:387) – Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah’. And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally.”

    Muslim (1:30) – “The Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not declare that there is no god but Allah.”

    Bukhari (52:73) – “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords’.”

    Bukhari (11:626) – [Muhammad said:] “I decided to order a man to lead the prayer and then take a flame to burn all those, who had not left their houses for the prayer, burning them alive inside their homes.”

    Muslim (1:149) – “Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause…”

    Muslim (20:4645) – “…He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa’id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!”

    Muslim (20:4696) – “the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihad died the death of a hypocrite.'”

    Muslim (19:4321-4323) – Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response: “They are of them (meaning the enemy).”

    Muslim (19:4294) – “When the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him… He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war… When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them… If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.”

    Muslim (31:5917) – “Ali went a bit and then halted and did not look about and then said in a loud voice: ‘Allah’s Messenger, on what issue should I fight with the people?’ Thereupon he (the Prophet) said: ‘Fight with them until they bear testimony to the fact that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his Messenger’.” The pretext for attacking the peaceful farming community of Khaibar was not obvious to the Muslims. Muhammad’s son-in-law Ali asked the prophet of Islam to clarify the reason for their mission to kill, loot and enslave. Muhammad’s reply was straightforward. The people should be fought because they are not Muslim.

    Muslim (31:5918) – “I will fight them until they are like us.” Ali’s reply to Muhammad, after receiving clarification that the pretext for attack Khaibar was to convert the people (see above verse).

    Bukhari 1:35 “The person who participates in (Holy Battles) in Allah’s cause and nothing compels him do so except belief in Allah and His Apostle, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty ( if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise ( if he is killed).”

    Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, “Kill any Jew who falls under your power.” Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad’s men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.

    Tabari 9:69 “Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us” The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

    Tabari 17:187 “‘By God, our religion (din) from which we have departed is better and more correct than that which these people follow. Their religion does not stop them from shedding blood, terrifying the roads, and seizing properties.’ And they returned to their former religion.” The words of a group of Christians who had converted to Islam, but realized their error after being shocked by the violence and looting committed in the name of Allah. The price of their decision to return to a religion of peace was that the men were beheaded and the woman and children enslaved by the caliph Ali.

    Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 484: – “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

    Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 990: – Lest anyone think that cutting off someone’s head while screaming ‘Allah Akbar!’ is a modern creation, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve.

    Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 992: – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.” Muhammad’s instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

    Saifur Rahman, The Sealed Nectar p.227-228 – “Embrace Islam… If you two accept Islam, you will remain in command of your country; but if your refuse my Call, you’ve got to remember that all of your possessions are perishable. My horsemen will appropriate your land, and my Prophethood will assume preponderance over your kingship.” One of several letters from Muhammad to rulers of other countries. The significance is that the recipients were not making war or threatening Muslims. Their subsequent defeat and subjugation by Muhammad’s armies was justified merely on the basis of their unbelief.

    Additional Notes:

    Other than the fact that Muslims haven’t killed every non-Muslim under their domain, there is very little else that they can point to as proof that theirs is a peaceful, tolerant religion. Where Islam is dominant (as in the Middle East and Pakistan) religious minorities suffer brutal persecution with little resistance. Where Islam is in the minority (as in Thailand, the Philippines and Europe) there is the threat of violence if Muslim demands are not met. Either situation seems to provide a justification for religious terrorism, which is persistent and endemic to Islamic fundamentalism.

    The reasons are obvious and begin with the Quran. Few verses of Islam’s most sacred text can be construed to fit the contemporary virtues of religious tolerance and universal brotherhood. Those that do are earlier “Meccan” verses which are obviously abrogated by later ones. The example of Muhammad is that Islam is a religion of peace when Muslims do not have the power and numbers on their side. Once they do, things change.

    Many Muslims are peaceful and do not want to believe what the Quran really says. They prefer a more narrow interpretation that is closer to the Judeo-Christian ethic. Some just ignore harsher passages. Others reach for “textual context” across different suras to subjectively mitigate these verses with others so that the message fits their personal moral preferences. Although the Quran itself claims to be clear and complete, these apologists speak of the “risks” of trying to interpret verses without their “assistance.”

    The violent verses of the Quran have played a key role in very real massacre and genocide. This includes the brutal slaughter of tens of millions of Hindus for five centuries beginning around 1000 AD with Mahmud of Ghazni’s bloody conquest. Both he and the later Tamerlane (Islam’s Genghis Khan) slaughtered an untold number merely for defending their temples from destruction. Buddhism was very nearly wiped off the Indian subcontinent. Judaism and Christianity met the same fate (albeit more slowly) in areas conquered by Muslim armies, including the Middle East, North Africa and parts of Europe, including today’s Turkey. Zoroastrianism, the ancient religion of a proud Persian people is despised by Muslims and barely survives in modern Iran.

    Violence is so ingrained in Islam that it has never really stopped being at war, either with other religions or with itself.

    Muhammad was a military leader, laying siege to towns, massacring the men, raping their women, enslaving their children, and taking the property of others as his own. On several occasions he rejected offers of surrender from the besieged inhabitants and even butchered captives. He inspired his followers to battle when they did not feel it was right to fight, promising them slaves and booty if they did and threatening them with Hell if they did not. Muhammad allowed his men to rape traumatized women captured in battle, usually on the very day their husbands and family members were slaughtered.

    It is important to emphasize that, for the most part, Muslim armies waged aggressive campaigns, and the religion’s most dramatic military conquests were made by the actual companions of Muhammad in the decades following his death.

    The early Islamic principle of warfare was that the civilian population of a town was to be destroyed (ie. men executed, women and children taken as slaves) if they defended themselves and resisted Islamic hegemony. Although modern apologists often claim that Muslims are only supposed to “attack in self-defense”, this oxymoron is flatly contradicted by the accounts of Islamic historians and others that go back to the time of Muhammad.

    Some modern-day scholars are more candid than others. One of the most respected Sunni theologians is al-Qaradawi, who justifies terror attacks against Western targets by noting that there is no such thing as a civilian population in a time of war:

    “It has been determined by Islamic law that the blood and property of people of Dar Al—Harb [ie. non-Muslim people who resist Islamic conquest] is not protected… In modern war, all of society, with all its classes and ethnic groups, is mobilized to participate in the war, to aid its continuation, and to provide it with the material and human fuel required for it to assure the victory of the state fighting its enemies. Every citizen in society must take upon himself a role in the effort to provide for the battle. The entire domestic front, including professionals, laborers, and industrialists, stands behind the fighting army, even if it does not bear arms.”

    Consider the example of the Qurayza Jews, who were completely obliterated only five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina. Their leader opted to stay neutral when their town was besieged by a Meccan army that was sent to take revenge for Muhammad’s deadly caravan raids. The tribe killed no one from either side and even surrendered peacefully to Muhammad after the Meccans had been turned back. Yet the prophet of Islam had every male member of the Qurayza beheaded, and every woman and child enslaved, even raping one of the captives himself (what Muslim apologists might refer to as “same day marriage”).

    One of Islam’s most revered modern scholars, Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, openly sanctions offensive Jihad: “In the Jihad which you are seeking, you look for the enemy and invade him. This type of Jihad takes place only when the Islamic state is invading other [countries] in order to spread the word of Islam and to remove obstacles standing in its way.” Elsewhere, he notes: “Islam has the right to take the initiative…this is God’s religion and it is for the whole world. It has the right to destroy all obstacles in the form of institutions and traditions … it attacks institutions and traditions to release human beings from their poisonous influences, which distort human nature and curtail human freedom. Those who say that Islamic Jihad was merely for the defense of the ‘homeland of Islam’ diminish the greatness of the Islamic way of life.”

    The widely respected Dictionary of Islam defines Jihad as “A religious war with those who are unbelievers in the mission of Muhammad. It is an incumbent religious duty, established in the Qur’an and in the Traditions as a divine institution, and enjoined specially for the purpose of advancing Islam and of repelling evil from Muslims…[Quoting from the Hanafi school, Hedaya, 2:140, 141.], “The destruction of the sword is incurred by infidels, although they be not the first aggressors, as appears from various passages in the traditions which are generally received to this effect.”

    Dr. Salah al-Sawy, the chief member of the Assembly of Muslim Jurists in America, stated in 2009 that “the Islamic community does not possess the strength to engage in offensive jihad at this time,” tacitly affirming the legitimacy of violence for the cause of Islamic rule – bound only by the capacity for success. (source)

    Muhammad’s failure to leave a clear line of succession resulted in perpetual internal war following his death. Those who knew him best first fought afterwards to keep remote tribes from leaving Islam and reverting to their preferred religion (the Ridda or ‘Apostasy wars’). Then the violence turned within. Early Meccan converts battled later ones as hostility developed between those immigrants who had traveled with Muhammad to Mecca and the Ansar at Medina who had helped them settle in. Finally there was a violent struggle within Muhammad’s own family between his favorite wife and favorite daughter – a jagged schism that has left Shias and Sunnis at each others’ throats to this day.

    The strangest and most untrue thing that can be said about Islam is that it is a Religion of Peace. If every standard by which the West is judged and condemned (slavery, imperialism, intolerance, misogyny, sexual repression, warfare…) were applied equally to Islam, the verdict would be devastating. Islam never gives up what it conquers, be it religion, culture, language or life. Neither does it make apologies or any real effort at moral progress. It is the least open to dialogue and the most self-absorbed. It is convinced of its own perfection, yet brutally shuns self-examination and represses criticism.

    This is what makes the Quran’s verses of violence so dangerous. They are given the weight of divine command. While Muslim terrorists take them as literally as anything else in their holy book, and understand that Islam is incomplete without Jihad, moderates offer little to contradict them – outside of personal opinion. Indeed, what do they have? Speaking of peace and love may win over the ignorant, but when every twelfth verse of Islam’s holiest book either speaks to Allah’s hatred for non-Muslims or calls for their death, forced conversion, or subjugation, it’s little wonder that sympathy for terrorism runs as deeply as it does in the broader community – even if most Muslims personally prefer not to interpret their religion in this way.

    Although scholars like Ibn Khaldun, one of Islam’s most respected philosophers, understood that “the holy war is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and (the obligation to) convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force”, many other Muslims are either unaware or willfully ignorant of the Quran’s near absence of verses that preach universal non-violence. Their understanding of Islam comes from what they are taught by others. In the West, it is typical for believers to think that their religion must be like Christianity – preaching the New Testament virtues of peace, love, and tolerance – because Muslims are taught that Islam is supposed to be superior in every way. They are somewhat surprised and embarrassed to find that this is contradicted by the Quran and the bloody history of Islam’s genesis.

    Others simply accept the violence. In 1991, a Palestinian couple in America was convicted of stabbing their daughter to death for being too Westernized. A family friend came to their defense, excoriating the jury for not understanding the “culture”, claiming that the father was merely following “the religion” and saying that the couple had to “discipline their daughter or lose respect.” (source). In 2011, unrepentant Palestinian terrorists, responsible for the brutal murders of civilians, women and children explicitly in the name of Allah were treated to a luxurious “holy pilgrimage” to Mecca by the Saudi king – without a single Muslim voice raised in protest.

    For their part, Western liberals would do well not to sacrifice critical thinking to the god of political correctness, or look for reasons to bring other religion down to the level of Islam merely to avoid the existential truth that this it is both different and dangerous.

    There are just too many Muslims who take the Quran literally… and too many others who couldn’t care less about the violence done in the name of Islam.

    TheReligionofPeace.com Home Page

    © 2006-2016 TheReligionofPeace.com. All rights reserved.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. You don’t get it, we don’t hate Muslims, but we see Islam as a dangerous form of government and not a religion at all as at its logical conclusion (if you are to adhere to the book) you are to go out and kill the infidels for not becoming Muslim. Those that are moderate are not reading their own book and this is why they are moderate! Do you not see? I, as a Christian hate no one but I do hate what is being done in the name of God and if you want to site the barbaric crusaders, great, we would all agree today that they led a very barbaric recapturing of lands that were conquered by Islam at that time…Should we condone what is happening now? Its not about hating a people, its about hating a religion that prompts hate and violence and has done so since its inception with its own leader…can you deny that he was a violent man himself who saw no problem in killing “infidels”? For all you know you are the infidels in truth! Who made you judge and jury of innocents who want to convert to Christianity or don’t want to convert to Islam? Who made you God, in other words?

    Like

  7. I don’t understand why all those who hate Muslims are never up for a reasonable, hate-less debate. I don’t understand why none of them actually listens to the arguments made from the other side. I don’t understand why none of them actually considers the fact that in life, you’re always wrong in many discussions, which you need to accept. I don’t understand why none of them uses reasonable arguments without hate. (Don’t get me wrong, you could argue that there are many wrong things about Islam, but not this way.) I don’t understand that all Muslim-haters are so unkind to people who just share a certain religion. Religion does not make you who you are; everyone is an individual, and has multiple identities. You can’t just hate Muslim believers or their religion, just because you hate Muslim terrorists. You shouldn’t. Instead, try to wash away the hate and try to think in a somewhat unbiased way. Usually, the middle way is the best answer to a complicated debate. Religion is complicated, Islam is complicated, and terrorism is complicated.

    Let me tell you something. I think you are going to reply to this in a way that I conceive as hateful. I think you are going to reply to this in a “I know all about this, so shut up” kind of way.

    Why am I writing this, then?

    I writing to you, because I truly believe that 99% of all people on this world are good. People are usually good. Everyone has bad bits in them, but most people are generally good. The same goes for Muslim-haters and Muslims alike. However, you have fallen into a media-propaganda-politics trap, allowing for a tunnel vision, i.e. narrow-mindedness. There’s nothing wrong about this. The thing is, however, that consequences of narrow-mindedness can be catastrophic (e.g. Holocaust, Rwandan Genocide, Great Purge, Atlantic Slave Trade and so on). You need to accept that it is possible that while the person you are arguing is wrong, maybe so are you. Maybe everyone is wrong to some degree, some more than others.

    Tell me your arguments, and I will refute all of them. I will tell mine, and you’ll counterargue all of mine. Seems hopeless and pointless, right? That is because we are not looking closely at our arguments before we make them. Rhetorically, I might win the argument, even though at the end of the day, I’m utterly wrong – or vice versa.

    Let’s not make this a battle. Let’s not hate each other. Let’s not hate religions beforehand. Let’s be open-minded. Let’s be kind.

    Here is some food for thought. I think you must think about this. Don’t reply to this immediately. Take some rest first. Think. Think, think, think.

    First some wise thoughts, then the real food for thought.

    I have decided to stick with love. Hate is too great a burden to bear.
    – Martin Luther King, Jr.

    It is easy to hate and it is difficult to love. This is how the whole scheme of things works. All good things are difficult to achieve; and bad things are very easy to get.
    – Confucius

    1. Why are there so many peaceful Muslims?
    2. Why are there so many societies were multiple religions live together in peace?
    3. Can you derive all conflicts between cultures or religion back to those very religions or cultures? Or are circumstances important too (e.g. media coverage, socioeconomics, politics etc.)?
    4. To how many different Muslims have you spoken?
    5. How many Muslims do you know personally?
    6. Why is Islam truly bad, if there are so many peace-loving Muslims?
    7. Have a look at the different interpretations of Islam, the Quran and the Hadith.
    8. Read about the different branches of Islam.
    9. How many Sufis have carried out terrorist attacks?
    10. If such a large percentage of the world is Islamic, why is much of the world relatively peaceful then? Why haven’t they colonised us yet? Why aren’t we all poor and suffering from everyday violence?
    11. Shouldn’t you consider the historical context of the Quran and later Islamic writings?
    12. Why are there many Christian and Jewish terrorists too?
    13. Why, do you think, is there violence between other religions and cultures too?
    14. Why are there Muslims who hate everything that’s Christian/Western/American? Is it because of religion, or is it perceived as due to religion, but in fact due to politics, economics and a complicated combination of factors, of which religion is but a small one?
    15. If the debate would be as easy as you argue, why do so many non-Muslims disagree with you?
    16. How about, you are wrong? Think about it. Why am I so sure that you’ll hardly consider this? It’s not a bad think to be wrong in a discussion. It’s a bad thing, though, if you don’t accept the possibility of being wrong after all.
    17. How about arguing without insults and hate? 🙂
    18. How about, this post was useless, because I’m afraid you’ll never truly understand my point? 😦

    I hope you will have a good, happy and prosperous life. I also hope your views will change. After all, this is how e.g. fascism started: when people were blinded by radical, extremist views (e.g. “All Jews must be exterminated.”). Blaming an entire religion, regarding it as fascist in its entirety, is usually just as bad as fascism itself.

    I am happy I live in a country were most people agree with me, not with you. Let’s hope this will remain the case.

    Let’s hope for peace, not hate.
    Let’s hope for peace, not terrorism.
    Let’s hope for peace, not racism.
    Let’s hope for peace and thinking, not fighting – whether physically or verbally.
    Let’s hope for peace, diversity, understanding and love.

    Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
    – Martin Luther King, Jr.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Presumptuous to assume that counter-jihad is mindless hate.

      Who’s wielding the blade? Whose blood is upon it?

      What do you assume is being overlooked?

      Like

    • I believe you need to educate yourself on your own religion and know what you are actually being taught. You have a fraudulent religion, parts of which were stolen from Judaism and also from Christianity and then totally perverted by your false prophet Muhammad. Let’s see you try to justify the passages from the Quran posted above. Islam does not really want the truth and have never been about finding the truth. You are even allowed to lie to defend your religion so what’s the use in arguing with you?

      Like

    • shut the fuck up asslicker, you let them take over and they will kill you for not being a shit eating muslim, skip the fuss and kill yourself,fag

      Like

  8. I think the users of this website should educate themselves, try and read some actual scholarly debates on Islam and politics rather than looking for reasons to hate the religion. Terrorists represent only a minority of Muslims and their existence is more an issue of society and the history of the foreign policy of Western governments towards the Middle East. If you wish to hate someone simply based on their religion then so be it, but then you are no different from terrorists whom you despise so much.

    Like

    • You spout something you appear to know very little about. This blog has been created exactly to demonstrate how wrong people like you are with reports from societies everywhere, government statistics, witness accounts, police reports, etc. And there’s over 8,000 articles for you to chose from.

      Like

    • I see, I’m sorry Professor I had no idea that you were an expert on the matter. I’d be most grateful if you could send me a copy of your thesis or your most recent publication…

      Like

      • You can read over 8,000 reports. You just don’t want to. You can also read in-depth historic reports from Islamic slaughters around the world – each and everyone verified from Bill Warner’s decades of studies. But our guess is you would never want to do that either but would counter-argue it without even opening one page…
        Typical Muslim mindset. It’s always extreme to some degree. This blind defense and refusal to neutral assessment is what is dangerous in the Muslim mindset. It will always find a justification while portraying its own barbarity as victimhood.

        Like

      • Sometimes I question the wisdom of allowing children unsupervised access to the internet.

        Like

    • The fact that you consider Islam to be a spiritual religion exposes your ignorance.

      I think you should educate yourself upon Political Islam rather than accept the lens of religion. The enmity of Islam stems from within and has nothing to with foreign policies. Attribution is a canard intended to deceive infidels. It sure works on you.

      Liked by 2 people

    • We hate no one but only a religion that can result in any terrorists at all…Which religion on this planet does that? None. There’s your answer…Islam is a religion of works and works, as the Old Testament, does not save anyone. True lovers of God will seek until they find…

      Like

    • It only takes a minority to create hell on earth and this is exactly what we are seeing now from all the jihads and sacrifice of your children in the name of Islam…Such a dark and useless religion in which obviously no one gets to see God because if they did there would be someone speaking with a voice of reason, tolerance and love…The blind leading the blind. I see you all as victims in a blind and dark world and feel pity more than anything. But you now ignorance is not really bliss…

      Like

    • Well Dane, if i am the same i guess i should fly some planes into buildings?
      Why didnt that whore you call mom have a back alley abortion?
      please die

      Like

  9. By the numbers, the violent criminal Muhammad was by far the most evil person who ever lived – 280 million deaths caused by Muhammad. Hitler and Stalin only got 60 million victims each. That makes Muhammad 4 to 5 times more evil than Hitler or Stalin.

    Val

    Liked by 1 person

  10. This is the saddest thing I’ve read in my whole entire life. How sad and lifeless should a human be to come up with such a blog? If you say you hate Muslims that much, then why are they taking that much of your time? Personally, if I hate someone or something i would ignore it. But I mean, if you took the time to come up with a blog, solutions, and a list of wanted Muslims, then Muslims must matter. Anyway that’s not my point. Why are we only focusing on Muslims? Did we forget that there are Christian terrorists as well? And Jew terrorists? Or don’t they count? Why when a Christian decides to shoot kids in their classroom for no apparent reason we start giving him excuses? “Oh maybe he had a rough childhood. He’s mentally unstable. He wasn’t in the right mind.” Why don’t we ever label him a terrorist? Oh wait, because he’s not a Muslim right? And how come the world doesn’t blame his religion for his behavior? Why don’t people start hating on anyone with the same religion as him? I mean, fine make a blog about terrorists and how you want to get rid of them but be fair with your judgement. Don’t involve religions because at the end of the day, the religion is not to be blamed. Blame his parents for how they raised him. Blame the society. Blame HIM for all I care. That’s exactly like when a woman says all guys are the same after having her heart broken by one. All men hate that sentence because you don’t like being judged according to an individual’s action.
    Now I know that a part of you (Admin), decided to do this blog just so you can get a reaction from Muslims. You want them to start cussing and say bad things about other religions just to prove a point, but trust me, they know better than that. Their religion taught them some good manners, it taught them how to deal with their enemies in the best way possible. In the most peaceful way possible. Yes you might have received some bad replies from Muslims but that doesn’t prove a point. Here’s a suggestion though, next time you decide to talk about Muslim terrorists and bad Muslims, try to read about terrorists from other religions too, because they are just as dangerous. And they need to be stopped as well.
    One more thing though, I suggest you go visit UAE. You need to see how people from all around the world and people from different countries and backgrounds live with each other. You will see normal Muslims living their normal lives just like you. So before you decide to judge Muslims, maybe you need to go see for yourself. Don’t believe everything you read or everything the media decides to show the world. See for yourself then judge. And maybe while you’re on it, educate yourself. Since you’re already wasting your time on Muslims, why don’t you read about them from trusted sources, maybe try reading their book or something. Hey here’s a crazy idea, why don’t you sit with one? They won’t kill you I promise.

    Have a good day. Or don’t.

    and hey here is a fun fact; there aren’t any Anti-religion blogs made by Muslims because one guy tried to screw it up for the others.

    Like

    • Interesting how bigoted people like yourself always find NEWS from around the world, displaying Muslim conduct of endless violence and terror onto others, as “hatred”. If the behavior of Muslims is hatred to you – then what is the culture?
      You’re just a Muslim who want to trivialize the satanic cult of Islam that is being superimposed onto people all across the world. If you were a humanitarian you would speak up for the Buddhist, Hindus. Christians and Jews who are targeted and slaughtered completely unprovoked in their own countries by the most evil political ideology in history.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Dear VERA TABIB,

        Please read the Holy Koran, try to understand the meaning by your own research and if you not convinced just leave it. No pressure !

        Do not judge whole religion “Islam” by the activities of few people!

        You can not blame a ‘knife’ for killing humans or misuse of your incomplete knowledge !

        Best wishes,

        Like

    • Well said OHWEL !

      ” . . . Why are we only focusing on Muslims? Did we forget that there are Christian terrorists as well? And Jew terrorists? Or don’t they count? Why when a Christian decides to shoot kids in their classroom for no apparent reason we start giving him excuses? . . . “

      Like

      • Please read the quran.

        We have you cretin that’s why we know that it is the most Vile Satanic piece of dribble ever written.

        It is nothing more than the sick fantasies from the insane mind of the most vile creature in all history mu-ham-head (a curse be upon him).

        Show us just one verse that proclaims love and respect for anyone other than a sick vile muslim.

        islam is not religion it is ANTI-RELIGION.

        Liked by 1 person

      • “Humanity is but a single brotherhood; so make peace with your brethren” (The Qur’an 49:10)

        Clearly you haven’t done your homework…

        I feel it is my duty to try and educate you somehow, although it is clear that others have failed. The Qur’an, much like the Bible and the Torah, was written more than a thousand years ago. Much of what is said in all of these religious texts is no longer relevant to today’s society, that is why it is the duty of the people who decide to follow these religions to interpret them in a progressive manner. In your attempt to read the Qur’an you have concluded that it preaches hate and is a “Vile Satanic piece of dribble”, this is because you are actively searching for hateful ideology within the Qur’an. In essence, you are no different from the terrorists. While the majority of Muslims follow the peaceful teachings of the Islam, you and terrorists interpret the meaning of the Qur’an as preaching violence and hatred because you are looking for reasons to hate. The people on this blog suggesting that Islam should be banned or outlawed are as ignorant as the fundamentalist Muslims who suggest that non-Muslims should be killed. If you put your efforts into educating yourselves and gaining new knowledge about religions, politics and society, you would find yourselves to be more understanding. Also, you might be able to contribute to some officially recognised scholarly debate or policy-making that would work to the benefit of society and put an end to the scourge of radical Islam instead of wasting your time spewing hate on websites such as this. The reason that there are so many Muslims from the West joining the Islamic State is because they have become alienated from Western society due to ignorant people such as yourselves, you have given them a reason to hate and they have interpreted Islam within the context of that hatred. Essentially, you and the terrorists are in the same boat as you are both fuelling each other’s hatred. I don’t wish to anger you with what I’ve written but I hope that I can at least inspire you to read more about the matter and formulate opinions based on scholarly findings as opposed to amateur blogs like this one.

        Best of luck.

        Like

      • Try and spout your looted pre-Islamic verses in the Quran, taken from 365 tribes around Arabia who had existed for centuries before Mohammed.

        Sharia is not based on these verses from the Koran. Sharia is based on the Hadith, which historically is deemed as the only authentic writings that was actually created during the lifetimes of Mohammed – meaning the Hadith is the true teachings of Islam. And as a Muslim posing under a fake non-Muslim name, you should be well aware that it’s the Hadith, Sirath and the Sharia originating from them that forms Islam and drives how Islam is followed and interpreted and nothing else.

        So, try and pull someone else’s leg with your nonsense and deception. You have no idea what tree you are barking against.

        Like

      • That’s kind of poetic. I look forward to your posts Ken Schroot. You have a way of expressing what the majority wishes they could say. Especially after reading about some nasty deviate raping a ten year old at a swimming pool.

        Like

    • Hi! I love your response. I agree with you wholeheartedly. Why do people call us terrorists, when what they say about us makes them look like terrorists to us? This isn’t fair. People should start educating themselves about the true message of Islam. Back in the days when Islam never existed, what happened? Killing of baby girls. Women being raped. Men torturing black slaves. Muhammad (peace be upon him!) ended this. He loved his daughters and sons and wives equally. Everyone here takes the advantage of the freedom of speech to promote hate, just like ISIS does. See the resemblance? What a coincidence

      Like

  11. all the Christians are slaves of Jews puppet of Jews u r killing ur own people by staging 9/11 Christianity is based on false book which is creation of humans Quran is the only Book there is not a single word is changed western civilization is marching towards its end the solution u r suggesting is actually end or western world coz u are surviving and waging wars on hours fuel power if we cut your fuel power then Obama and Nathan Yahoo will have to ride on Cycles and if u think u can fly plan on batteries then best of luck lolz Think the western world without oil and Another Hitler is somewhere near for Jews lolzzzzzzzzzzz Muslims are the reality of this world every super power fights Muslims you know y ? coz they know we are the only free people who can stand against them, we are the bravest nation and we are the fighters who scared from no one and people like u are mentally slaves the world is incomplete without Muslim and no new world order can stand a chance without Muslims. I am actually laughing on the solution u have suggested it is not a solution it suggests u r mentally ill lolz I m pretty much sure u r Jew coz Jews always do foolish and nonsense things like this and believe me the day will come when jews will forget the great Sir Hitler coz that day there will be no jew lolzzz

    Like

    • Question:

      Do we want within our country an ideology that runs its own schools, madrassas, that crank out semi-literate, bigoted cranks like this intellectual and moral pigmy?

      For you Americans, I remind you we are neigh upon the time we can post to elected office the people we need to expel these repulsive, dangerous barbarians. Time to upgrade America by upgrading the people.

      Like

    • Please stop resembling people hating against our peaceful religion. It’s only gonna make it worse, and you are offending Jews. Please don’t take this offensively, I’m just letting you know that although what you said is true, the Jew part is pretty offensive.

      Like

  12. In India Hindus are killing all allies. the Tribals, The Dalits, Christian and Sikhs. Hence There will always be readymade allies for Islam.

    Like

    • How many islamic bullets will your religion stop. None I think. Pacifism in any extreme is chains on the mind and body. Jesus is my lord and I will die defending my religion before my head is removed. In fact I plan on taking many of them with me. Good luck in your fairy tale ideas

      Like

    • tell them to pray to Jesus christ, the prince of peace, they may well die, but they can go to heaven in lieu of havin three squares of satans ass along with the rest of the muslim shit chuggers

      Like

    • Many Muslims desire to leave Islam, but are afraid of being killed by fellow MuslimsYou lie, why do Muslims stay in their faith when they get to an Islam free country?…the first thing Muslim want is Islamic law,

      Like

  13. Your are trying to do the same what Prithiviraj chauhan did he tried his best to stop khwaja Garib nawaz(ajmer) still he converted lakhs to muslims not by terror but his teachings, don’t waste your time in worshipping idols, you also have to face judgement day one day, the stay on earth is for very small time.

    Like

    • Oh you poor ignorant bastard, Muhammed was a suicidal paranoid who made up words from God to justify his evil deeds. He will only lead you to hell, turn away. Which do you follow, Sunni or Shia? After you conquer the world how many of them must you kill?

      Like

      • Dear JAMES,

        Please read the Holy Koran, try to understand the meaning by your own research and if you not convinced just leave it.

        No pressure ! Please do not judge whole religion “Islam” by the activities of few people!

        Best wishes,

        Like

      • Please read the quran.

        We have you cretin that’s why we know that it is the most Vile Satanic piece of dribble ever written.

        It is nothing more than the sick fantasies from the insane mind of the most vile creature in all history mu-ham-head (a curse be upon him).

        Show us just one verse that proclaims love and respect for anyone other than a sick vile muslim.

        islam is not religion it is ANTI-RELIGION.

        Liked by 1 person

  14. My friend if Islam truly was a barbaric religion of hellfire and war, do you honestly think you would be alive today, running this two-bit blog publication? lol. You guys are such a joke. In cahoots with the Arabs but you want the downfall of Islam. Yours is the lot that colonised half the world, killed off cultures and nations in the name of progress but the muslim world is barbaric. I know your argument about how that was yeaaaaaaaaaaars ago and you’re all civilized now. It was 60 short years ago, my friend, and in recorded history, that timespan is but a heartbeat. My name isn’t John, brother, it’s Ahmad and Jihad is indeed an internal struggle to improve one’s self. Just calling something jihad doesn’t make it so. Jihad comes with restrictions and conditions. Instead of spreading hate, educate yourself because you can’t ban us, you cant label us facist, you can’t kill us off, for all purposes, your hands are tied and I know that must make you feel just awful because of the hate coursing through your veins, just know this: the terrorists aren’t muslims. No true muslim will ever do the things these animals are doing. Instead of validating their unholy crusade, reach out to muslims, find out the truth and you will see it for yourself.

    Like

    • The history of Islam is written in blood splatter.

      There is no afterlife. There is but one life, followed by permanent death.

      Every claim of divinity is a lie. Anyone believing such a claim is a fool. There are no exceptions.

      Islam is the most destructive colonizer in history. Islam intends to expand and complete the destruction.

      Islam is a region for pirates and Muhammad bin Abdullah was a pirate.

      —————————————————————————————————

      …you can’t ban us…

      …find out the truth …

      We see the truth and it is sickening. You are loyal onto yourselves only. You are treasonous criminals void of morality who cannot be trusted. And this is why we want you banned from the West.

      —————————————————————————————————

      Being an atheist can be lonely. But it is better than being stupid.

      Have a nice day.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Oh, auto-correct made the word “religion” into the word “region”.

        Islam makes regions for pirates, then fills them with the pirates it’s made.

        Like

      • Gee Pigasux, I did not know you were so knowledgeable about death, perhaps you can tell us all what is the value than of honesty, loyalty, helping your fellowman, oh, wait the muslims do not do any of these things. Perhaps you went to the wrong site. Maybe a good atheist heart warming death chant is more your speed. You know nothing of death and apparently not much of what makes good people better.

        Like

      • I posted this four days before having the aortic section of my heart cut away and replaced with one from a barnyard animal. How did you spend the holiday? Trolling the cyberworld, looking for opportunities for cheap shots you’d be too chicken to mouth in person? Working on your Barbie™ collection?

        Like

    • People engaged in trade, not invasion, occupation by force. What former Western colony was left in worse condition after they left than when they arrived? And what Islamic invaded country has even been returned to their original owners? Not even one. And not one of the countries Islam invaded has ever become prosperous. on the contrary, they have turned into impoverished warring hellholes. And the wealthy, successful countries that managed to force Muslims out have not recovered from the damage done to them.
      Islam is the plague. It’s a curse, not a blessing. And you’re one of the members of that satanic cult with a history of nothing but death and destruction. Not even one country ruled under Islam experienced a golden age of knowledge and success. The Muslims were parasitic hosts on other people’s wealth and learning and nothing else.

      Liked by 2 people

    • ahmad, I did reach out and was repulsed. The story of your prophet was awful reading. If you feel you must be in a cult or a religion try one that is not so ugly and hateful. The koran pretty much tells how to kill, who to kill, when to kill. It is plain and simple, submit or die, true? I will submit to no cult or religion or made up god. It is all bullshit. When you die you are gone. There is no paradise with little boys and virgins. There is no heaven where you sit at a table with god. By the way. we can and will ban you,you are facist, you can be killed off, our hands are not tied. I do not fear you. Freedom is coursing through my veins. The terrorists are moslem. There is no true moslem, moderate moslem, or modern moslem. There are only moslems. Submit or die! islam=death.

      Liked by 3 people

      • No Quarter, you sound just like the terrorists…Have you never heard that two wrongs don’t make a right? “an eye for an eye makes everyone blind…” I am a Christian and Jesus says to love our enemies…I don’t hate Muslems but I do believe that they are not serving the real God of love…The Q’uran does not make love its all abiding theme as the Bible does. Their God is more like our Old Testament God…they are still there and have not progressed to Christ who can lead them to a loving God. We are not mandated to hate the sinner, only the sin.

        Like

    • You moronic Mohammedan!

      ● “Slay the nonbelievers wherever you find them. Drive them out.” (2:190)

      ● “Allah wished to confirm the truth by His words: ‘Wipe the infidels out to the last.’” (8:7)

      ● “. . . kill the disbelievers wherever we find them. . .” (2:191)

      ● “Instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers.” (8:12)

      ● “I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.” (8:12)

      ● “Strike off the heads of the disbelievers” and make a “wide slaughter among them.” (47:4)

      ● ”Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them.” (8:59)

      ● “. . . fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, torture them, and lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.” (9:5)

      ● “A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. . . Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.” (Ishaw:327)

      SO STICK YOUR PATHETIC TAQIYYA IN YOUR DISEASED BUSHY BEARD- YOU ARE FOOLING NO-ONE!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Do you realize how offensive that was? I can’t believe my eyes. YOU SHOULD GET REAL PROOF OF THESE “VERSES”. WHERE DID YOU GET THESE? EVERYONE THESE DAYS HAVE BEEN RUINING THE PEACEFUL IMAGE OF ISLAM. INSULTING ISLAM MAKES YOU LOOK LIKE A TERRORIST. YES, YOU HAVE THE FREEDOM TO SAY WHATEVER YOU WANT, BUT REALLY ALL YOU’RE DOING IS SPREADING HATE. have a nice day 🙂

        Like

    • Again with the threats. You can never read even one intelligent word from an Islamic fool. When their ignorance overcomes them they make threats. Just remember we have used atomic weapons before on people. Do you think Allah made you radiation proof?

      Like

      • You’ve got it ALL wrong, buddy. Where does this come from? The Qur’an? No, from everyone’s hateful opinions of Islam.

        Like

    • Ok I see that you might be somewhat reasonable but then how do you explain the following? http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm. If your religion does not bring you to love (and that is not the theme of the book) then where does it ultimately lead? It seems to me that it leads to exactly what we are experiencing now, which is outward jihad and not the self transforming one you are describing. The reason is that Mohammad himself set the example. Are you going to argue with that? If so lets have it…

      Like

    • You are talking about colonization which the Arab world did as well throughout the Christian the early Christian world and by the sword. You don’t suppose Islam spread by the love of Christ or Mohammad do you? You are following a false prophet and desecrating the name of the God of love…We left Old Testament ways a long time ago but Islam is still stuck in that mindset and needs a reformation as well. Reformation and transformation by God’s only Son. Be saved now in the name of Jesus!

      Like

    • muhammed ahmad, you mountains pile of shit,fuck that cocksucker mohammed, how dare you compare muslims to animals when muslims are not worthy to eat animal shit, animal are wonderful and beautiful, creatures of GOD,!
      SATAN SHIT AND THERE WAS MULIMS

      Like

  15. “Jihad” means, above all else, an internal struggle to improve oneself — that is how this mandate is interpreted by 99% of muslims in the world, esp in the West.

    Like

    • Above all else? Anjem Choudary and all the other spongers of the Jihad Seekers’ Allowance are locked into a struggle to improve themselves?

      And your name is John, not Abdul or Achmed? Are you Protestant then John?

      Like

    • Wrong.
      Jihad means the struggle by muslims to imposes islam onto the entire world. The personal struggle you refer to is just one part of that struggle. It is the struggle of the individual muslim to prepare himself to take part in the war by which muslims will force non-muslims to submit to islam.
      And therefore like all non-muslims, I must do all I can to oppose muslims in their fight to ruin those parts of the world which they haven’t already ruined.

      Like

    • Until you are commanded to kill or be killed. Above all else you will try to kill me. I reject all things islam and moslem, it is ugly and awful and your mandate is world domination. You may not believe that now but you will eventually be given no choice. Submit or die! Did you survey the moslem population of the world to come up with this 99% crap? I think not. So stfu a hole.

      Like

    • Wow, Jihad means internal struggle yet throughout Islamic history we have had violent “jihads” that kill “infidels”. It seems to me that the meaning has always meant to improve yourself by eliminating those that don’t believe in your prophet. From the beginnings of Islam that kind of thing has been going on…Why not be truthful to yourself about that and admit that your prophet himself was off the mark in his own persecution of the early Christians and Jews and set the tone for what we are and have been experiencing since he started this religion? Thank God there is a true God that will be the there at judgement time when the true followers of a loving God will come into heaven and those that persecuted in “Allah’s” name make their way straight to hell…no virgins there but everlasting fire…Turn away from your false God and turn to Christ who shows the way to our Loving Father…

      Like

  16. Unfortunately we need oil, another reliable and efficient energy source to fuel industry, heating and transport is a long way off, therefore I do not agree with this ban. We need the production of oil to be governed and monitored by western allies.

    Like

    • There is oil all over the world. There is no need to acquire it from Muslim countries and get entangled in trade with these savages. And countries like Germany, for example, implement so many solutions already to energy needs that do not requires oil. We now have cars running longer on batteries than oil, so this to is not really necessary but is forced on society by the oil trade.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Never mind about all that dirty oil…in 16 years solar will be the #1 energy source; technology has come a long way and even oil companies are investing in those technologies…Take a tip from me and find a good start up solar company and buy some stock as you will see these soar in the next few years!

        Like

    • Lee, when the oil runs out of the Middle east they will see just how much Allahs words are worth. They will just start killing themselves even more. Like Muhammad did when he stole food, raped children and killed his own people. They were once poor camel riding, dirty faced starving people and to that they will return

      Liked by 1 person

      • There is no need to insult others in this discussion about their religion…As a matter of fact Islam was the center of civilization during the time that Europe was in the dark ages and influenced Europe to the Renaissance but not clued up on that region’s history too well so don’t really know what happened to make the culture slide into decay. I do know that now they need to be more constructive and would in face get the help they need to advance if they could be trusted but trust on both sides has been so badly broken now, I’m not sure how in the world this is going to end…I would imagine with another awful and costly war that will involve the whole world (WWIII) What a shame that human beings have to resort to barbarism to settle differences…we have not evolved very far from the beasts we think are so inferior to us…

        Like

    • NO! Oil is not worth the bloodshed going on with everyone there and that IS a crime that we, as a nation, will also be accountable for…I hate when our government says things like “protecting our interests” as it is blood for oil and it has to stop! In any case solar is now less than oil according to many reports and as you can see for SunEdison, Tesla Motors and many other companies now that have progressed the technology to where it is going. In sixteen years or so there won’t be any more of this barbaric trading of lives for this cursed and polluting fuel…I will be the first one to buy shares in these clean, local, companies that also create jobs right here in the U.S.

      Like

Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s