Muslims WorldWide

Canadians from Iran and Pakistan rally against the “Islamophobia” law


Look how they use reversed psychology. If you object to religious misogyny, homophobia, racism, pedophilia and attempted genocide, you are an Islamophobe. It’s unreal that anyone buys into this.

.

.

M-103: Liberal Government Will Support Iqra Khalid’s Motion Condemning Islamophobia

The Huffington Post Canada |  By M

Posted: 02/15/2017 2:50 pm EST Updated: 02/15/2017 6:28 pm EST

Federal Liberals will support a backbencher’s motion calling on the government to condemn Islamophobia and study the best ways to quell an “increasing public climate of hate and fear.”

Motion 103, tabled by Liberal MP Iqra Khalid last December and set for debate Wednesday, has sparked divisions among Conservatives and raised the ire of those who argue its adoption could have a chilling effect on free speech.

iqra khalid

Iqra Khalid is welcomed by her colleagues as she arrives to make an announcement about an anti-Islamophobia motion on Parliament Hill on Feb. 15, 2017. (Photo: Patrick Doyle/CP)

The non-binding motion has also been the subject of rumours and innuendo from some right-wing blogs in Canada and the United States suggesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is seeking to somehow criminalize criticism of Islam.

Khalid addressed some of those concerns Wednesday at a press conference with Heritage Minister Mélanie Joly. The pair was surrounded by Liberal MPs in what Joly called a “demonstration of solidarity.”

Joly said that the government was voicing “strong and clear” support for Khalid’s motion. She later said that while all Liberal MPs will be free to vote based on their own beliefs, there will be “very strong support” from caucus.

“M-103 is about ensuring that, in Canada, we stand for free and respectful exchanges of ideas and opinions,” Joly said. “And there is no place for hatred and no tolerance of abuse.”

Khalid noted that the motion came on the heels of an e-petition tabled in the House in Commons, signed by nearly 70,000 Canadians, condemning Islamophobia.

If M-103 passes, the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage will be asked to develop a “whole of government approach” to combat systemic racism and “contextualize hate crime reports so Canadians can understand what is happening on the ground,” Khalid said.

The Mississauga MP said that while the motion makes specific mention of Islamophobia, it is “broad in scope to include all marginalized communities.”

Khalid also noted that she and other colleagues have received hateful comments over the motion in recent weeks that only highlight the work that needs to be done.

“This strengthens my resolve to continue to combat this issue,” she said.

‘This is not legislation’

Khalid denied the motion could in any way restrict the rights of Canadians to express their views on things such as sharia law or face-covering niqab veils.

“This is a motion, this is not legislation,” Khalid said. “And I would be the first person to oppose anything that infringes on our Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This motion is about having a study on how we can tackle important issues like systemic racism and religious discrimination.”

But several Tory leadership hopefuls have already made it clear that they will not support M-103. Kellie Leitch tweeted last month that the motion does not treat “all religions equally” and suggested it grants “special privileges” to Islam.

In recent days, other rivals have joined Leitch in criticizing Khalid’s effort and announcing they too will not support the motion.

Andrew Scheer released a statement saying M-103 is not inclusive.

“It singles out just one faith,” Scheer said in a release. “I believe that all religions deserve the same level of respect and protection.”

Maxime Bernier suggested that while M-103 is not a bill and lacks teeth, it could be a “first step” in restricting the fundamental right of Canadians to express their opinions on a specific religion.

“We should reaffirm everyone’s right to believe in and criticize whatever belief they want, whether it is Islam, Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, atheism, or any other,” Bernier said in his release.

Tory leadership contenders seek specifics

Tory leadership Kevin O’Leary also told The National Post he won’t support the motion. “It is ill-conceived and it is a slap in the face to other religions and to other races,” O’Leary told The Post.

Both Scheer and Bernier took specific umbrage with the fact that the motion does not define Islamophobia. At the press conference Wednesday, Joly said Islamophobia is the “discrimination of Muslim people and people who are of Muslim faith.”

A reporter noted that Tory MPs have said they approached Khalid with ideas for amendments and were shut down. Khalid said the wording of the motion, as it stands, has broad support from MPs, organizations, and Canadians at large.

“Watering down the words of this motion is not in the best interest of all these people,” she said.

Ambrose accuses Liberals of playing games

Interim Conservative Leader Rona Ambrose has also said she won’t vote for the motion. Ambrose took to Facebook to explain that while M-103 won’t bar free speech, she is concerned the term “Islamophobia” could be used to shut down legitimate debate and “to intimidate rather than to inform.”

“I do worry that some of my work trying to empower women and girls in Muslim communities could be branded as ‘Islamophobic’ if I criticize practices that I believe are oppressive,” she wrote.

Ambrose said two Tory critics tried to work with Khalid to change the language to reflect the need to fight discrimination against all religious communities, but were denied.

“This motion is simply being used by the Liberal Party and the Prime Minister to play partisan politics,” Ambrose said.

But at least one Tory leadership hopeful is prepared to support Khalid.

Michael Chong released a lengthy statement saying he will vote in favour of M-103. Chong’s statement said that, in light of the recent deadly attack on a Quebec City mosque, it is “appropriate and important that Canadian Parliamentarians” tackle the issue of anti-Islamic prejudice.

Chong said it was untrue that the motion grants special treatment to Canadian Muslims, noting how the House has passed motions in recent years dealing with Jewish people, Yazidis, and Egyptian Coptic Christians.

michael chong
Conservative leadership candidate Michael Chong will support M-103. (Photo: CP)

“Motion 103 does not set us down the path of sharia law in any way, shape, or form,” Chong said.

MP says she was told to ‘go home’

Khalid, who was born in Pakistan and immigrated to Canada from England, recounted the bigotry she faced as a “young, brown Muslim Canadian woman” when she tabled the motion in December. Khalid said she was told to “go home,” even though Canada was her country.

“I am a proud Canadian among hundreds and thousands of others who will not tolerate hate based on religion or skin colour,” she said at the time. “I rise today with my fellow Canadians to reject and condemn Islamophobia.”

Police-reported hate crimes against Muslim Canadians have more than doubled in the past three years, according to recent numbers from Statistics Canada.

The full text of Khalid’s motion is below:

Systemic racism and religious discrimination

That, in the opinion of the House, the government should: (a) recognize the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear; (b) condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination and take note of House of Commons’ petition e-411 and the issues raised by it; and (c) request that the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage undertake a study on how the government could (i) develop a whole-of-government approach to reducing or eliminating systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia, in Canada, while ensuring a community-centered focus with a holistic response through evidence-based policy-making, (ii) collect data to contextualize hate crime reports and to conduct needs assessments for impacted communities, and that the Committee should present its findings and recommendations to the House no later than 240 calendar days from the adoption of this motion, provided that in its report, the Committee should make recommendations that the government may use to better reflect the enshrined rights and freedoms in the Constitution Acts, including the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 

With a file from Emma Paling

9 thoughts on “Canadians from Iran and Pakistan rally against the “Islamophobia” law

  1. All you cool Scandinavians and your beautiful vowels. One of these days, you will force me to learn Danish or Swedish and start serving rotmos med fläsk or making gravalox in the pantry ( and then I’m done for, lol )

    You do of course realise that when I force my browser to turn everything into English that the translations always come out cock-eyed, right ?

    *****

    The overwhelming majority of Muslims in the world ( and in the West ) do not truly believe in freedom of speech, nor in our open societies. They want to enjoy our economic prosperity and–relative–socio-political stability. Some of them, of course, do want to subjugate us as part of the ‘mission’ of Islam geopolitically.

    They do not want to ‘suffer’ our criticisms of their inbreeding and low IQ, they do not want to assimilate and contribute, they do not want to alter their behaviours and they mostly resent us. Muslims do not want us to look too closely at their scriptures, history, nor at their prophet. And they absolutely do not want us to openly criticise anything about him or their belief-system or behaviours.

    Islam–and Muslims–have always insisted on ‘special’ treatment, and this is actually enshrined in the Koran, the various Hadith, the Sunnah and Siyar. They demand special dispensations even as minorities and we are seeing this unfold in Europe now. It is illegal in Germany or the low countries to make direct criticisms of Islam or Muslims and this is considered ‘hate’ speech.

    In mid-December 2016, free-thinking Finland became the latest addition to the ‘club’ where it is now illegal to criticise Islam. If you dare to breach ‘legal ettiquette’ and direct approbrium towards Mohammed’s Minions, you must be quite careful to distinguish between the ‘benevolent Muslims’ and ‘Radical Islam’. You now cannot critique Islam directly nor openly. As Tyler Durdan ( pseudonym of a contributing editor at ZeroHedge ) reposted ( from Judith Bergman at Gatestone ), “It is troubling that Western governments are so eager to crack down on anything that vaguely resembles what has erroneously been termed “Islamophobia,” which literally means an irrational fear of Islam. Considering the violence we have been witnessing, for those Westerners who have studied Islam and listened to what the most influential Islamic scholars have to say, there are quite a few things in Islam of which one legitimately ought to be fearful.”

    ( http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-12/europe-illegal-criticize-islam )

    This tactic ( of silencing their opponents ) has proven successful. It is their continuing strategy to marginalise those who would criticise Islam, attempts which with time broaden in scope and penalty. We are now subject to government prosecution and this has opened other doors to financial ruination from civil lawsuits, as well. This process has started in the United States, but freedom of speech is still openly possible here. Sure, we can be labelled as ‘Islamophobes’, but there is nothing illegal in publicly arguing the relative merits of a dangerous religious dispensation like Islam yet. The ‘Progressive’ Leftist thugs can riot and prevent someone like Milo Yiannopoulos from giving a lecture and Q&A at Berkeley, but the message still gets out.

    The European Union has been hijacked by its unelected bureaucrats who have a ‘Progressive’ socialist agenda. The Radical Leftists and the Islamists have found a natural–albeit unholy–alliance in their shared contempt of Europeans, European cultures and Western Civilisation in general. Brexit is a sign of health and a rousing of some nationalist preservation sentiment amongst a majority of Britons, at least. The cultural outrage felt by other Europeans at the colonisation of their homelands and assaults on their persons by barbarians is real–and both ineluctable and undeniable. Add to this the utter contempt that European Union bureaucrats ( and their own leaders ) hold for them and the ‘official’ denial of the problems thus engendered, and you have a recipe for a ‘right-wing’ reaction in other nations, as well. The almost indolent acceptance and neutrality of the Swedes is largely an affectation: these are the Vikings, remember ? Sweden is beseiged with the Muslim Ettins and the Mother of Grendel masquerading as Stefan Löfven. Has the world forgotten Beowulf ?

    The European Union was a really, really good idea as a trading platform and a way to forge closer socio-economic ties within Europe. It became a very, very bad thing in the hands of leaders like Angela Merkel and the unsmiling suits in Brussels. All socialist governing bodies inevitably spread out into every area of life and become increasingly totalitarian and repressive. After having but recently thrown off the shackles of the Soviet Union and World Communism, Europe has apparently already started surrendering to the new neighbourhood thugs who would dictate how they must live, what they should believe–and what they should and should not be able to say.

    Western Civilisation is under assault. Do not be so fatuous as to believe otherwise. The people who have organised this assault mostly are quite aware of what they are doing and actually approve of the mayhem. It is a way for them to gain even more power and wealth and…control.

    George Soros, former President Obama and the rest of the ‘Great Socialists’ are in fact Chaos Merchants and many of them are actual sociopaths. Just as we must focus on Islam and the warlord who created it and dare to critique them, we must also focus on the Socialists and the powerful men and women who are forcing this agenda–and their pet barbarians–upon us all.

    -adena.properties-

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hei Ericka, hva tror du om Trumps énstatsløsning? Jeg er for å jage alle jordanerne ut av Israel. Israel er fra Nilen til Eufrat. Mellom de elvene er israels land.

    Like

  3. Absurdistan ( Sveariket) har ca blitt drept av Svetsaren og Ruinfeldt. Jeg vil komme over Svinesund med AG3 og M72 for å forsvare Norge mot stanere

    Like

Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s