Muslims WorldWide

US Security Contractor Warns: Muslims Will Kill Americans & Are Very Good Manipulators

Retired Marine Steve Gern now working as a private security contractor talks about the video he made where he warns the US about the reaction local Iraqis had after President Trump signed his executive order banning travel from countries like Iraq.

The Marine is describing ordinary Muslims with no declared terror ties wanting to kill Americans.

One of the most profoundly truthful statements originating from Gern’s observations of Muslim psychology is, “What I have learned over the years of working with them is that they are very good at manipulation. They can manipulate just about anyone. They will tell you what they want you to hear and they can keep that up for many, many years”. That is EXACTLY the core Muslim quality. And they use it constantly. The protests and problems we see stirring up across the US absolutely has a Muslim hand behind it. The more reason to keep them out and to deport them.

6 thoughts on “US Security Contractor Warns: Muslims Will Kill Americans & Are Very Good Manipulators

  1. Its hard to understand that Islam is all about deception. There is really nothing in the West that can compare with the extreme deviousness, treachery and ruthlessness of Islam ( and hence Muslims). In the Koran, more than once, is the phrase ” And Allah is the best of deceivers.”

    Do you know of ANY other religion that says this about their God?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: US Security Contractor Warns: Muslims Will Kill Americans & Are Very Good Manipulators | The Muslim Issue – MINNESOTANS FOR FREEDOM

  3. Yet another American dares to tell the truth on Fox. The other mainstream media simply won’t touch this sort of report–other than to briefly mention it, supply a quick sound bite and then denigrate it–because it doesn’t fit in with their ‘Narrative’.

    Most people in America and the West have little acquaintance with Islamic core scripture and have been taught pseudo-history instead of actual history. They simply do not understand why we are having so much trouble with Islam and why Muslims are a problem for us. They cannot comprehend the threat. Many ordinary Americans and Europeans–even ‘conservative’ ones still cling to the belief that if Muslims integrate and assimilate that will simply be half the battle. The other half of the ‘problem’ will be solved, they reason, once ‘extreme’ vetting is locked into place. The idea that Islam itself is the problem and that the exclusion of Muslims–and eventual destruction of Islam–is the only permanent solution seems overkill to them. People who tell them this are branded ‘extremists’ even by conservative commentators.

    Islam is in fact an ‘extreme’ ideology. It demands an ‘extreme’ reckoning.

    All bonafide religions that have been created by men and evolved within our civilisations have certain core values in common. Central to these is the notion that as a member of this faith you should treat all men fairly and equally, that there are certain universal modes of behaviour and discourse. You have this ‘selling point’ of a ‘Golden Rule’ where you should feel empathy towards others–regardless of race, ethnicity, national origin or religious dispensation. There is the understanding that there are universal truths and things like lying to others, deceiving them, cheating them–and murdering them–is a transgression against moral and ethical precepts.

    Islam doesn’t do this; it subverts universal morality and weaponises ethics.

    Islam has no universal standards applicable to its faithful and their dealings with one another and non-Muslims; it seeks subjugation by any and all means, methods and opportunities.

    Islam is not a bonafide religion. It poisons the well of human relationships.

    Mohammed orders Muslims to lie, cheat, deceive, rape, enslave and kill. He actually counsels his followers exactly how to do these things. These ‘precepts’–and many examples of how he and his companions applied them–are found in the slim pages of the Koran and the various Hadith. It is laid out like a recipe book or a battle plan, in black and white, for anyone and everyone to read and understand. It is entirely within the public purview. Muslims themselves and Muslim scholars and imams–and their political leaders–even state these things plainly when they appear on talk shows and scrawl them on banners during their ‘protests’.

    Their aim is to subjugate us. Everything is fair game in accomplishing this goal. They can–and do–lie to us. There are even several ‘technical’ terms for the types of lies, the scope of their lies and the ‘scale’ of the deceit they are ‘permitted’ to employ. Taquiyya, Tawriya, Kitman, Muruna ( and three additional words ). Quite obviously, if they have so many ways and means of lying to non-Muslims ( a perfectly acceptable thing for them to do, since it was ‘sanctioned’ by their Prophet ), then it is important to them.

    Here are some examples ( excerpts ). For a fuller treatment of this subject, there are numerous other websites that discuss this, including my specific source here:

    (16:106) – Establishes that there are circumstances that can ‘compel’ a Muslim to tell a lie.

    (03:028) – This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to ‘guard’ themselves against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim should appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not feel that way.

    (09:003) – “Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters…” The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.

    (40:028) – A man is introduced as a believer, but one who had to “hide his faith” among those who are not believers.

    (02:225) – “Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts” The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.

    (03:054) – “And they ( the disbelievers ) schemed, and Allah schemed ( against them ): and ALLAH IS THE BEST OF DECEIVERS.” The Arabic word used here for scheme ( or plot ) is MAKARA, which literally means ‘deceit’. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same.

    Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may feel ‘compelled’ to deceive others for a greater purpose.

    Sahih Bukhari (52:269) – “The Prophet said, ‘War is deceit.'” The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad’s men after he ‘guaranteed’ them safe passage. ( Mohammed routinely dealt falsely with others and even entered into ‘treaties’ he had every intention of breaking whensoever it suited him. )

    Sahih Bukhari (49:857) – “He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar.” ( Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means. )

    Sahih Bukhari (84:64-65) – Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permitted in order to deceive the “enemy.”

    Sahih Muslim (32:6303) – “…he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband ( in a deceit to bring about reconciliation between them ).”

    Sahih Bukhari (50:369) – Recounts the murder of a poet at Muhammad’s insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain his trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his home, whereupon he was murdered.

    Reliance of the Traveler
    “Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible ( i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible ), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory… it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression…

    “One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie.”

    Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat (and subjugate ) them:

    TAQUIYYA – Saying something that isn’t true as it relates to the Muslim identity.

    TAWRIYA – Intentionally creating a false impression.

    KITMAN – Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 05:032 ( that if anyone kills “it shall be as if he had killed all mankind” ) while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse and others mandate murder in undefined cases of “corruption” and “mischief.”

    MURUNA – ‘Blending in’ by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to fool non-Muslims and with the eventual goal of enforcing Sharia and all ‘authorised’ practices and prohibitions.

    Though not called Taqiyya by name, Muhammad clearly used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans that allowed him access to their city while he secretly prepared his own forces for a takeover. The unsuspecting residents were conquered in easy fashion after he broke the treaty two years later. Some of the people in the city who had trusted him at his word were executed.

    Another example of lying is when Muhammad used deception to trick his personal enemies into letting down their guard and exposing themselves to slaughter by pretending to seek peace. Mohammed had absolutely no trouble simply slaughtering prisoners, or murdering completely unarmed and subjugated captives. In the case of the Banu Qurayza, he ordered their genocide. All males and boys were ‘examined’ for pubic hair and then beheaded, while the women and children ‘captives’ were raped and sold into slavery.

    Such was the reputation of Muslims for lying and then killing that even those who ‘accepted’ Islam did not feel entirely safe. Consider the fate of the Jadma tribe. They had already ‘converted’ to Islam to avoid slaughter. Muslim missionaries talked them into converting and laying down their weaponry, but the unarmed men of the tribe were quickly tied up and beheaded anyway.

    Today’s Muslims often rationalize Muhammad’s murder of poets and others who criticized him at Medina by falsely claiming that they broke a treaty with their actions. Yet, these same apologists place little value on treaties broken by Muslims. From Muhammad to Saddam Hussein, promises made to non-Muslim are distinctly non-binding in the Muslim mindset.


    No other religion on earth tells its adherents to lie, to cheat, to deceive, to rape, to enslave and to murder to advance its spread. Islam does. Mohammed was a warlord who weaponised religion into an actual thing of terror. Mohammed actually employed terror as a means of accomplishing his goals, seizing property, treasure, slaves and sexual partners. He told his Muslims that terror was a very effective tool.

    Muslims have been–faithfully–following his precepts for the past 14 centuries without interruption. The terror that now grips our nations is no new thing; it is Muslims being very good Muslims.

    Whenever social people lie or try to deceive others, they have ‘tells’. Trained experts or ordinary folk can pick up on the indications that they are being lied to or deceived. Psychopaths, however, can lie or deceive and give no outward indications. This is because they possess neither true human empathy nor a functioning conscience.

    Muslims can lie or try to deceive others and will, likewise, give no ‘tells’. They can tell lies and not register on lie detectors. This is because they have been ‘reassured’ by Mohammed and their religious leadership that there is no moral penalty for lying to and deceiving non-Muslims. They can in fact rationalise all evil behaviours, so long as they are perpetrating atrocities against non-Muslims–or against their fellow Muslims who are ‘soft’ against the Infidel.

    If more Westerners and Americans understood this, we simply would not have a Muslim ‘problem’ in the world today; we would have a Muslim ‘solution’.

    Liked by 1 person

Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s