Muslims WorldWide

Islamic Invasion Of India: The Greatest Genocide In History


Muslim historian Firishta [full name Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah, born in 1560 and died in 1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim, was the first to give an idea to the medieval bloodbath that was India during Muslim rule, when he declared that over 400 million Hindus got slaughtered during Muslim invasion and occupation of India. Survivors got enslaved and castrated. India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500’s the Hindu population was 200 million.

By the time the British arrived to the shores of India and after centuries of Islamic law ruling India, the Hindu population was not behaving like their normal self; they were behaving like Muslims. There are many witness reports from the British archives of horrendous Hindu incidents that were shocking in cruelty to the British – and they therefore sometimes referred to the people as “savages”. Yes, anyone who gets contaminated by the association with Islamic ‘culture’ truly gets tainted and savaged. That is exactly why it is so detrimental and dangerous.

Today, like other cultures with a soul massacred by Islam, India is not truly a Hindu nation. India is a shadow of Islam, a Hindufied version of Islam, where every human atrocity has been emulated and adopted into a culture previously alien to such brutality. And in association with it’s foreign mohamedan pest, these Islamic habits have become adopted and accepted as a “normal” part of Indian culture. But if we look at pre-Islamic Indian culture it was a in general a benevolent culture of knowledge and learning, much more so than it is today.

From the time of the Umayyad Dynasty (711AD) to  the last Mughal, Bahadur Shah Zafar (1858), so widely praised as great leaders by Indian historians themselves, entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. “Hindu slaughter.”

.

.

The_Mughal_Empire

The Mughal Empire’s spread and occupation of India.

The genocide suffered by the Hindus and Sikhs of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.

The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis.

The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Punjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700’s.

We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus.

https://i2.wp.com/lyemium.com/sites/default/files/copy%20of%20Weeks_Edwin_Craftsman_Selling_Cases_By_A_Teak_Wood_Building_Ahmedabad.jpg

Paintings by Edwin Lord Weeks.

These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed – and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the World’s biggest holocaust.

Dr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states:

“There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty.

The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526).”

He also writes in his book “Negation in India”:

“The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. Thus, the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000 was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. Hindu slaughter.”

Will Durant argued in his 1935 book “The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage” (page 459):

“The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period.”

Francois Gautier in his book ‘Rewriting Indian History’ (1996) wrote:

“The massacres perpetuated by Muslims in India are unparalleled in history, bigger than the Holocaust of the Jews by the Nazis; or the massacre of the Armenians by the Turks; more extensive even than the slaughter of the South American native populations by the invading Spanish and Portuguese.”

https://i2.wp.com/lyemium.com/sites/default/files/Man_in_Armour.jpg

Writer Fernand Braudel wrote in A History of Civilisations (1995), that Islamic rule in India as a

“colonial experiment” was “extremely violent”, and “the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm – burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion there were forced conversions. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves.”

Alain Danielou in his book, Histoire de l’ Inde writes:

“From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions. It is, as usual, in the name of ‘a holy war’ of their faith, of their sole God, that the barbarians have destroyed civilizations, wiped out entire races.”

Irfan Husain in his article “Demons from the Past” observes:

“While historical events should be judged in the context of their times, it cannot be denied that even in that bloody period of history, no mercy was shown to the Hindus unfortunate enough to be in the path of either the Arab conquerors of Sindh and south Punjab, or the Central Asians who swept in from Afghanistan…The Muslim heroes who figure larger than life in our history books committed some dreadful crimes. Mahmud of Ghazni, Qutb-ud-Din Aibak, Balban, Mohammed bin Qasim, and Sultan Mohammad Tughlak, all have blood-stained hands that the passage of years has not cleansed..Seen through Hindu eyes, the Muslim invasion of their homeland was an unmitigated disaster.

“Their temples were razed, their idols smashed, their women raped, their men killed or taken slaves. When Mahmud of Ghazni entered Somnath on one of his annual raids, he slaughtered all 50,000 inhabitants. Aibak killed and enslaved hundreds of thousands. The list of horrors is long and painful. These conquerors justified their deeds by claiming it was their religious duty to smite non-believers. Cloaking themselves in the banner of Islam, they claimed they were fighting for their faith when, in reality, they were indulging in straightforward slaughter and pillage…”

A sample of contemporary eyewitness accounts of the invaders and rulers, during the Indian conquests.

Islam in India

The Afghan ruler Mahmud al-Ghazni invaded India no less than seventeen times between 1001 – 1026 AD. The book ‘Tarikh-i-Yamini’ – written by his secretary documents several episodes of his bloody military campaigns :

“The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously [at the Indian city of Thanesar] that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it…the infidels deserted the fort and tried to cross the foaming river…but many of them were slain, taken or drowned… Nearly fifty thousand men were killed.”

In the contemporary record – ‘ Taj-ul-Ma’asir’ by Hassn Nizam-i-Naishapuri, it is stated that when Qutb-ul- Din Aibak (of Turko – Afghan origin and the First Sultan of Delhi 1194-1210 AD) conquered Meerat, he demolished all the Hindu temples of the city and erected mosques on their sites. In the city of Aligarh, he converted Hindu inhabitants to Islam by the sword and beheaded all those who adhered to their own religion.

The Persian historian Wassaf writes in his book ‘Tazjiyat-ul-Amsar wa Tajriyat ul Asar’ that when the Alaul-Din Khilji (An Afghan of Turkish origin and second ruler of the Khilji Dynasty in India 1295-1316 AD) captured the city of Kambayat at the head of the gulf of Cambay, he killed the adult male Hindu inhabitants for the glory of Islam, set flowing rivers of blood, sent the women of the country with all their gold, silver, and jewels, to his own home, and made about twentv thousand Hindu maidens his private slaves.

India has a deep, long cultural history. Hinduism began there around 1,500 BC and Buddhism around the 6th century BC. This culture had evolved impressive intellectual, religious and artistic pursuits. Pre and post the early days of Islam, Indian scholars took their works in science, maths (zero, algebra, geometry, the decimal system, so-called ‘Arabic’ numbers are actually Hindu ones!), medicine, philosophy etc to the courts of others (including Muslims eg Baghdad).

 

Others came to study in India’s established universities. Indian children (boys and girls) were educated in the relatively widespread education system in a wide variety of subjects eg science, medicine and philosophy. India’s art and architecture was magnificent. They were a prosperous people. Then came Islam – slaughter, slavery, rape, violence, pillage; destruction of religious sites, art and architecture; poverty, exploitation, humiliation, famine, forced conversion, decline in intellectual pursuits, social destruction and a worsening of social ills. To Islam, anything that is not Islamic is from a time of ignorance –Jahiliyya- and must be destroyed (or appropriated and called Islam’s!). The onslaught created the Roma (gypsies), destroyed ‘Hindu’ Afghanistan and formed Pakistan (Kashmir) and Bangladesh .

The cost of the Muslim invasions is massive in lives, wealth and culture. Estimates suggest that 60-80 MILLION died at the hands of Muslim invaders and rulers between 1000 and 1525 alone (ie over 500 years-the population FELL). (Lal cited in Khan p 216) Impossible you think? In the war of Independence of Bangladesh, 1971, the Muslim Pakistani army killed 1.5-3 million people (mainly Muslims …) in just 9 MONTHS. (Khan p 216). The world looked the other way—but don’t we always when it’s Muslims committing the violence! [*The actual number of Hindus brutally slaughtered by Muslims were around 400 million, not 60-80 million, according to Firishta [1560-1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim].

Based on the figures that are available, the number of Indians enslaved is enormous!

The Muslim conquest of India was probably the bloodiest in history:

The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with utmost glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave-markets, and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by the sword in this period” (historian Durant cited in Khan p 201)

And Rizwan Salim (1997) writes what the Arab invaders really did:

‘ savages at a very low level of civilisation and no culture worth the name, from Arabia and West Asia, began entering India from the early century onwards. Islamic invaders demolished countless Hindu temples, shattered uncountable sculpture and idols, plundered innumerable forts and palaces of Hindu kings, killed vast numbers of Hindu men and carried off Hindu women. ………but many Indians do not seem to recognize that the alien Muslim marauders destroyed the historical evolution of the earth’s most mentally advanced civilisation, the most richly imaginative culture, and the most vigorously creative society.” (cited in Khan p 179)

Of course Indians pre-Islam, fought, but it was NOT the practice to enslave or ravage, or massacre, or destroy religious sites, or damage crops and farmers. Battles were usually conducted on open soil between military personnel. (Khan p 205-207) There was no concept of ‘booty’ so Indians were unprepared for Islam’s onslaught. Indigenous Indians were forced to flee to jungles and mountains, or face gruelling exploitation and taxes, slaughter or enslavement while their society was demeaned and destroyed. Muslims constantly attacked the indigenous, idolatrous population and also fought against each other in ceaseless revolts by generals, chiefs and princes during the entire time of Islamic rule (Khan p 205).

Slavery: Initially ‘India’ included part of today’s Pakistan (Sindh), Bangladesh/Bengal and Kashmir. Hinduism and Buddhism flourished in Afghanistan pre the Islamic takeover (7th century). In the 16th century Afghanistan was divided between the Muslim Mogul (Mughal) Empire of India and the Safavids of Persia.

Initially the godless Umayyads, allowed Hindus dhimmi status – possibly because of their large numbers, resistance to Islam and their value as a source of tax income. This violates Islamic text and law which demands death or conversion for idolaters and polytheists. When Sultan Iltutmish (d 1236) was asked why Hindus weren’t given the choice between death and Islam, he replied:

“but at the moment in India…the Muslims are so few that they are like salt (in a large dish) …however after a few years when in the capital and the regions and all the small towns, when the Muslims are well established and the troops are larger….it would be possible to give Hindus the choice of death or Islam” (cited in Lal [c] p 538) (Can we learn anything from this)

Despite their supposed ‘dhimmi’ status, mass slaughter, mass forced conversion and mass enslavement with the resulting forced conversion to Islam were practised throughout Islamic rule and into the 20th century as many demanded the idolaters/polytheists convert or die. Hindu fighters and males were slaughtered with women and children enslaved. Eunuch slavery was practised on young boys.

Often actual numbers aren’t given, just comments like ‘countless captives/slaves,’ or ‘all the women and children were taken.’ Where numbers are recorded, they are terrifying. Along with people, the Muslims took everything they could—coins, jewels, cloths, clothes, furniture, idols, animals, grain etc or destroyed it.

Muslim rulers were foreigners. Until the 13th century, most slaves were sent out of India but following the Sultanate of Delhi (1206) they were retained to work for the sultanate, sold in India or sent elsewhere. Slaves from elsewhere were imported and Muslim armies were composed of a wide array of foreign slave groups ‘converted’ to Islam and ‘Hindus’ and Indian ‘converts.’

Slaves were the promised booty from Allah and obtaining them was a strong motivation for jihad.

“slaves were so plentiful that they became very cheap; men…were degraded….but this is the goodness of Allah, who bestows honours on his own religion and degrades infidelity”. (Muslim chronicler Utbi on Sultan Subuktigin of Ghazni’s slave raid [942-997] in Sookdheo p166)

In Sindh (first area attacked successfully) the early ‘Muslim’ community was composed mainly of slaves forced into Islam and a small number of Arab masters (Khan p 299). Initially slaves were forced out of India eg Qasim (Arab), the conquerer of Sindh sent by Hajjaj bin Yusuf Sakifi in the caliphate of Walid I, took 300,000 from a 3 year campaign in 712-715 (Khan p 299, Trifkovic p 109). Muslim fighters came from everywhere to partake in this ‘jihad.’ Qasim was suddenly recalled and executed (possibly by being sown in an animal’s hide) for supposedly violating 2 Sindhi princesses destined for the caliph’s harem!! (Lal [c] p 439)

The Ghaznivids-Turks from Ghazni, Afghanistan (997-1206) who subdued the Punjab.

From 17 raids (997-1030) Sultan Muhmud Ghazni (Turk from Afghanistan, 997-1030) sent hundreds of thousands of slaves to Ghanzi (Afghanistan) resulting in a loss of  about 2 million people via slaughter or enslavement and sale outside India (Khan p 315).  Chroniclers (eg Utbi, the sultan’s secretary) provide some numbers eg -from Thanesar, the Muslim army brought 200,000 captives back to Ghazni (Afghanistan). In 1019, 53,000 were taken.  At one time the caliph’s 1/5th share was 150,000 suggesting 750,000 captives.  500,000 were taken in one campaign (at Waihind)(Lal [c] p 551) Mahmud’s secretary al-Utbi records:

“Swords flashed like lightening amid the blackness of clouds, and fountains of blood flowed like the fall of setting star.   The friends of god defeated their opponents….the Musalmans wreaked their vengeance on the infidel enemies of god killing 15,000 of them…making them food of the beasts and birds of prey….god also bestowed on his friends such an amount of booty as was beyond all bounds and calculations, including 500,000 slaves beautiful men and women” (Khan p 191)

The Ghaznivid’s ruled in the ‘Islamic sultanate of the Punjab’ till 1186.  Attacks in Kashmir, Hansi, and districts of the Punjab resulted in mass slaughter and enslavement eg 100,000 in a 1079 attack in the Punjab (Tarik –i-Alfi in Khan p 276-7,  Lal [d] p 553


Under the Ghaurivid rulers (Turks) eg Muhammad Ghauri (Afghani) and his military commander then ruler, Qutbuddin Aibak (r1206-1210), the Delhi sultanate was set up. Mass beheadings, enslavements, forced conversions, plunder and the destruction of temples continued. Slaves were incredibly plentiful. In 1195, Aibak took 20,000 slaves from Raja Bhim and 50,000 at Kalinjar (1202) (Lal [c] p 536).

“even the poor (Muslim) householder became owner of numerous slaves.’ (Khan 103, Lal [c] p 537).

Through the 13/14th century ruled by the Khilji (Khaljis) and Tughlaq’s, slavery grew as Islam spread. Thousands of slaves were sold at a low price everyday (Khan p 280). Alauddin Khilji’s (r 1296-1316) capture of slaves was stupendous and he shackled, chained and humiliated slaves (Lal [c] p 540). In the sack of Somnath alone he:

“took captive a great number of handsome and elegant maidens, amounting to 20,000 and children of both sexes ..more than the pen can enumerate. The Mohammadan army brought the country to utter ruin, destroyed the lives of inhabitants, and plundered the cities and captured their offspring.” (historian cited in Bostom p 641, Lal [c] p 540)

Many thousands were massacred. Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 slave BOYS in his personal service and 70,000 slaves worked continuously on his buildings.(Lal [c] p 541)

Women practised Jauhar (burning or killing oneself to avoid enslavement and rape) and sati.

The Sufi Amir Khusrau notes “the Turks, whenever they please, can seize, buy or sell any Hindu” (Lal [c] p 541)


Enslaved and Castrated

Eunuchs: All over the Islamic world, the conquered were castrated, including in India. This was done so men could guard harems, provide carnal indulgence for rulers, give devotion to the ruler as they had no hope of a family of their own and of course, this quickly reduced the breeding stock of the conquered. Castration was a common practice throughout Muslim rule possibly contributing to the DECLINE in India’s population from 200 million in 1000 CE to 170 million in 1500 CE (Khan p 314)

Once Sultan Bakhtiyar Khilji conquered Bengal in 1205, it became a leading supplier of castrated slaves. This remained the case into the Mogul period (1526-1857).

Akbar the Great (1556-1605) owned eunuchs. Said Khan Chaghtai owned 1,200 eunuchs (an official of Akbar’s son Jahangir)! In Aurangzeb’s reign, in 1659 at Golkunda (Hyderabad), 22,000 boys were emasculated and given to Muslim rulers and governors or sold. (Khan 313).

Sultan Alauddin Khilji (r 1296-1316) had 50,000 boys in his personal service; Sultan Muhammad Tughlaq (r 1325-51) had 20,000 and Sultan Firoz Tughlaq (r 1351-1388) had 40,000 (Firoz Tulghlaq liked to collect boys in any way and had 180,000 slaves in total (Lal [c] p 542). Several commanders under various sultans were eunuchs. Muslim historians record the ‘infatuation’ of sultans Mahmud Ghazni, Qutbuddin Aibak, and Sikandar Lodi –for handsome young boys! Sultan Mahmud was infatuated by his Hindu commander Tilak (Khan p 314)

Eunuch guard

Conclusion:  The inhuman behaviour applied to the whole Indian population by Muslims was the same whether the Muslims were Sufis, Arabs, Afghanis, Turks, or Mogul as all followed Islam’s laws, text and the fine example of Mohammad.   It should also be noted that the violence and enslavement continued even after they had virtual control over India because the aim was not merely to conquer but to force all into Islam.  Muslims did not come to join Indian society, they came to wipe it out and replace it with Islam—which tells them that they own everything because it’s the booty promised by allah.  The pagans/idolaters, polytheists had to convert or die and only then could there be (Islamic) peace!  Slaves were the just reward for Islam’s fighters–part of the booty promised by allah.
References:

1)  Bostom, A. G.  ‘The Legacy of Jihad:  Islamic holy war and the fate of the non-Muslims.’  Prometheus Books.  New York.   2005.
2)  Khan, M. A.  ‘Islamic Jihad:  A legacy of forced conversion, imperialism and slavery.’ iUniverse, Bloomington, IN.  2009.  (An Indian ex-Muslim) – FULL PDF BOOK HERE
3)  Lal [a], K.S. Muslims invade India p 433-455 in Bostom (1) above.
4)  Lal [b], K.S. Jihad under the Turks and jihad under the Mughals p 456-461 in Bostom (1) above.
5)  Lal [c], K.S. Slave-taking during Muslim rule p535-548 in Bostom (1) above.
6)  Lal [d], K.S. Enslavement of Hindus by Arab and Turkish invaders  p 549-554 in bostom  (1) above.
7)  Lal [e], K.S.  The Origins of Muslim slave system p 529-534 in bostom (1) above.
8)  Reliance of the Traveller:  A classic manual of Islamic sacred law.   In Arabic with facing English Text, commentary and appendices edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller  Al-Misri, Ahmad ibn Naqib;  Amana publications  Maryland USA 1994.
9)  Sookhdeo, P.  ‘Global Jihad:  The future in the face of  Militant Islam.’  Isaac Publishing.  2007.
10)  Trifkovic, S. ‘The sword of the prophet.’   Regina Orthodox Press, Inc.  2002.
11)   Ye’or, Bat.  ‘Islam and Dhimmitude: Where civilisations collide’  translated from the French by Miriam Kochan and David Littman.  Fairleigh Dickinson University Press 2002, reprint 2005.

 

 

240 thoughts on “Islamic Invasion Of India: The Greatest Genocide In History

  1. Please go through this blog intended to impart strength and courage to EX-Muslims. To help Muslims and other believers to free themselves from the tentacles of one’s own religion. These two posts questions the very crux of Islamic beliefs like “concept of the one God”, ” the real kafir” etc.

    http://www.oughttothinkrationally.com/the-authenticity-of-one-god-concept/

    http://www.oughttothinkrationally.com/the-real-kafirs/

    Thanking you.

    Like

  2. All this just to impose their lies on a peaceful Hindu and Buddhist population!

    I challenge Muslim scholars to prove without a doubt;
    1. That mecca existed in the 7th century at the time of this so called Muhammad?
    That it was not till the second fitna when the black stone was relocated from jordon to the hejaz for safekeeping did mecca rise to prominence
    2.That a lot of Islamic practices are not copied from the Jews e.g. Even the prayer ritual
    3. The Quran did not plagiarize from Aramaic Syriac literature and hymns
    4. That there is any complete copy of the Quran available before the time of Abd al Malik? (The Birmingham pages recently found may predate Muhammad )
    4. The Sira and the Hadith literature was not compiled centuries later by the Umayyad and Abbasid rulers to create law and order and control their populace
    5. That majority of the scientists in Abbasid golden age were non Muslims or recent converts?

    Like

    • Till first 200 years of Islam, all mosques pointed to Petra, Jordan including Jerusalem mosque. Only after 200 years, mosques start pointing towards mecca, after Petra got destroyed in a major earth quake and hajar aswad/black stone got transfered to mecca to make a new center in about 900 AD.

      Archeology of the mosques built within first 200 years of islam indicates that they all point to Petra as qibla. These mosques include: 1) Al-Aqsa, Jerusalem 2) Bagdad 3) Wasit 4) Guangzhou, China 5) Madina 6) Fustat, Cairo, Egypt

      It is arguable if mohammad ever existed, or that he was just a small christian reformist, who later got arabised by the Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan (the inventor of islam).

      There is no mecca mentioned in koran, and prophet is mostly called “rasul/messenger” because arabs were themselves confused who was their messenger. Mohammad (the praised one) is similar to what we call Mister in English or monseur in french, a respected personality.

      Like

  3. THE WAR IS IMPOSED BY 12.5% OF ANY POPULATION ON REST OF THE 87.5% PEOPLE.WE SHOULD ENJOY 87.55 PEOPLE.PUTTING ATTENTION ON 12.55 WAR LIKING PEOPLE IS NOT GOOD.

    Like

    • Ashutosh, You are transparent in your Taquyia apologetics for Islam with your foolish and unfounded percentages. Even if we take your stupid percentages we could ask that the 87% that do not want war should take back the power, or in this case RELIGION, back from the, so called, jihadist extremists. That should and could be easy to do if it were not for the true fact that many “MODERATE” Muslims, Sunnis and Shiites, believe that honor killings of their mothers, daughters and homosexuals is a normal and necessary thing. So because YOU sir, value HONOR over the sanctity of life, like Christians and Hindus do, we can not coexist with tolerant people of all faiths and secular beliefs.

      Like

  4. They genuinely tried to remove all traces of Hindus and they succeeded in Afghanistan …. That was the era of darkness. Information was not flowing freely. But, what about now? Why should we tolerate these idiots and their medieval inhuman practices and activities?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Dear Pankaj, That is the ONLY discussion that we should be having. The contemporary jihad and civilization jihad, that we are CURRENTLY experiencing. The people that put up these historical discussions would be the ones that are trying to distract from the current status of Islam. Let’s not be distracted and support Marine Le Pen in France next month and hope that all western countries will SERIOUSLY, POLITICALLY INCORRECTLY AND DIRECTLY address this very serious and complicated problem.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Need to know who is the author of this article?? It is quite misleading historical records and very smart way of accumulating only wrong information about Islam and other religion too. Not all Muslim leaders have been into killing n slaughtering.. Same stand for other religion too.. Request to check on your historical facts before making such bad article which is quite provocative.

    Like

    • Every Hindu knows these facts. All the ill-practices like sati, child-marriage, castism etc. in hindu society were due to this sudden Islamic onslaught…. A lot of exploration is required to unearth all these ugly facts. People have the right to know: what actually happened during Islamic invasion?? No more JNU type idiots should be allowed to hide historical facts ….

      Like

  6. 400 millions of hindus were killed by muslim army. What might be the number of killers ?? Muslims came from another land and native hindus were in authority and power in their own land. Some thousands or lacs or even 1 million muslims killied 400 millions hindus and Hindus failed to defend in their own land. And each muslim killed hundreds or thousands of hindus, And claiming it, they think they are doing a good job in the support of Hindus…….. …. … And this was only recorded by some Anti-Islamists orientalists ONLY. No historical records found on these false claims.

    Like

    • Dear Abdullah, And all other Muslim apologists posting here. In the days of Mohamed many of the neighboring pagan communities and cultures were very peaceful and peace loving and were not very well trained and prepared to defend themselves since they had been living that way for a very long time. The problem why Islam is being put under the microscope for non believers to observe and prepare themselves for what is happening in western Europe today, is because of the Muslim Brotherhood’s plan to “take over our miserable;e house by our own hands” (ie leftists useful idiots-as quoted by Stalin). So we non believers that have been living in peace for 250 years in America, longer than that in Europe, are learning Islamic history from real scholars. Not Muslim Brotherhood clerics with an agenda of what they call ‘civilization jihad’.

      And as for Farhan Usami’s comment of what good does it do to bring up Islamic brutality from the past, it is the same response as above. Because it is happening in 2017 AGAIN! If Christians, Hindus, Muslims, Jews were being burned at the stake by Christians, like they used to do 400 years ago, then we would be revisiting the history of Christian brutality. Christianity has evolved and reformed to be able to exist alongside “non believers” of Christianity PEACEFULLY AND HAVING THEM TRUST US THAT WE ARE NOT LYING TO THEM ABOUT OUR INTENTIONS. So there is no need to rehash or even defend Christian brutality. As you are trying to disguise Muslim historical (AND PRESENT DAY) brutality.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Hindus were pacifist. They were not allowed by their religion to kill life, neither animal nor human. So it was easy for the Muslim barbarians to overtake them by total brutality.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Utter nonsense, the Hindu kingdoms (Pratiharas, Rashtrakutas, Pala and Sena etc etc.) of the post-Gupta period were warring with each other for hundreds of year, even when the Turkish and Ghuri came rumbling… Do not forget this! It is just not that disturbing for you when Hindus kill Hindus.

        Also: “Hindu Kush means “kills the Hindu” or “Hindu killer” and is a reminder of the days when slaves from the Indian subcontinent died in the harsh weather typical of the Afghan mountains while being taken to Central Asia.” in R. W. McColl (2014). Encyclopedia of World Geography. Infobase Publishing. pp. 413–414.

        So do not spread lies.

        Like

    • Are you saying this because you are Muslim & your religion teaches that it is ok & a part of jihad to lie & not tell the truth to non muslims?

      Like

  7. Ridiculous post, Gengis Khan killed millions of people in India in the 1200s and he wasn’t muslim. The coward who wrote this is making hate propaganda.

    Like

      • Islamo-sympathizers are still smarting over their walloping by the Mongolian mounted armies. They approve of putting people to the sword, but only when Muslims are swinging the swords.

        Barbaric throwbacks to the Bronze Age have long memories. That’s why the Iranians are still whining about Alexander the Great.

        Like

    • What an assinine statement…right at the beginning it tells you the source of the historical fact…A MUSLIM Mohammad qasim hindu shah…1560 to 1620 a.d. Wrote and revealed the truth to world…Something that Muslims should be ashamed of..and even today try every opportunity to cover up or gloss over…you must be one of them.

      Like

  8. Sanjay Leela Bhansali should hire historians that could give him the real idea about Musalmans who killed 400 million Hindus over the 700 years of the darkest Indian history. Trump IS RIGHT TO PUT MUSLIM BAN. India should follow, and still p being slaves of Muslims, and Islam.

    Like

      • Did not intervention of the British prevent the complete disarticulation of Hindustan? That’s the complaint of the Muslim psychopaths: they couldn’t murder them all off, like Allah wants.

        Muslims should be rounded up and locked up in hospitals for the criminally insane. The poor dears have had their shot and proven themselves unworthy.

        Like

      • Muslims are Inbred (Multiple Generational Cousin/Close Family Marriage) – FACT – It lowers IQ / Intellect and spacial ability. It Also increases retartedness/aggression/ clannishness and in-group preference and dislike of the outgroup + tribal loyalties etc.

        Islam is also a Theocratic/Political system it is MORE than a religion! This is why so many muslims find it hard to Assimilate in the west or any society. Plus add in the Leftists/Marxists and you have a recipe for a MESS!

        Like

  9. History is a strange amalgam of personal interpretation and the relative nature of reality itself. Historians like Romila Thapar has not found any reference to the Islamic plunder of India. in the contemporary Indian account of those periods in question. Evidently for her the Islamic shenanigans are tantamount to a myth. Why our historians do not confront Romila Thapar over it.That will be the day.

    Mala Shelley.

    Like

    • Dear Shelly Chauduri, What do YOUR “historians” have to say about the fact that for the 13 years that Mohamed lived in Mecca he could only succeed in converting less than 100 to Islam. Most of them were hi immediate family members. But then for the 11 years he lived in Medina, before dying from poison from one of his captured sex slaves, he was able to convert the entire middle east, much of north Africa some of eastern Europe and as far east as India. Do you personally believe that all these people were so impressed with the peaceful nature of Islam? You do not have to be brain surgeon to realize that Islam has never been peaceful and that the carnage is making a comeback in the civilized world thanks to liberals and political correctness

      Like

      • How Islam was not spread by the sword
        BY MDI TEAM ON JANUARY 7, 2015 • ( 8 COMMENTS )
        Lost Islamic History

        It’s a common accusation made against Muslims and Islam in general: “The only reason Islam is a world religion is because it spread by the sword.” It’s a favorite remark of Islamophobes who parade as analysts and historians fear-mongering about the threat Islam supposedly poses to the Western World. With it being such a hot topic that causes so much debate, it is appropriate to analyze and study this topic to better understand whether it is valid or not.

        Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and Persia – The First Conquests

        After the life of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him), Islamic expansion truly began in the early 630s, AD. Campaigns against the Byzantine and Sassanid (Persian) Empires were initiated which pitted this new religion of Islam, with its desert Arabian warriors against the established and ancient empires centered in Constantinople and Ctesiphon.

        Abu Bakr, the first caliph of Islam, gave these armies rules which would seem very constricting by today’s standards of warfare:

        “Stop, O people, that I may give you ten rules for your guidance in the battlefield. Do not commit treachery or deviate from the right path. You must not mutilate dead bodies. Neither kill a child, nor a woman, nor an aged man. Bring no harm to the trees, nor burn them with fire, especially those which are fruitful. Slay not any of the enemy’s flock, save for your food. You are likely to pass by people who have devoted their lives to monastic services; leave them alone.”¹

        These rules were very unique and innovative for the time. Just before this Muslim expansion, the Persians and Byzantines had fought a decades-long war that left lands from Syria to Iraq in ruins. Abu Bakr made it clear that Muslim armies do not operate by the same principles and restrict their fights to the armies and governments of the enemy, not the general populace. Islamic Shari’ah law, based on the example of Abu Bakr, clearly forbids the use of force against anyone except in legitimate cases of war against a clearly defined enemy.*

        The purpose of this article is not to delve into the tactics and individual battles of this conquest of Egypt, Syria and Iraq. It is enough for our purposes here to state that Syria was under Muslim control by 638, Egypt by 642, and Iraq/Persia by 644. The Byzantine Empire, having lost its religious base in Syria, as well as its commercial base in Egypt was greatly weakened. The Sassanid Empire, on the other hand, completely ceased to exist after the Muslim conquest. Politically, it was a disaster for these two giant empires. But, going back to the main idea of this article, how did Islam as a religion spread in the conquered areas?

        Unequivocally, the general populace was not forced or induced to convert to Islam. If anything, they were encouraged to continue living their lives as they had for centuries before. In the example of the conquest of Jerusalem, the caliph at the time, Umar ibn al-Khattab, wrote in the surrender treaty with the patriarchs of city:

        He [Umar] has given them an assurance of safety for themselves, for their property, their churches, their crosses, the sick and healthy of the city…Their churches will not be inhabited by Muslims and will not be destroyed…They will not be forcibly converted.²

        No other empire or state at the time had such ideas about religious tolerance. Umar, being a companion of the Prophet, sets a precedent in this treaty about the treatment of conquered peoples in Islamic law. The rest of the conquered lands, in Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and Persia had similar treaties. Whether the citizens of the conquered lands were Christian, Jew, Sabians, or Zoroastrians, they were allowed to keep their religious traditions. There exists not one example of forced conversion in these early conquests.

        Proof of the lack of forced conversion in these areas is the remaining Christian communities in these countries. For the first few centuries after the Muslim conquest, the majority of the population of these areas remained Christian. Slowly, they began to take on Islam as their religion and Arabic as their language. Today, large percentages of Christians remain in Egypt (9%), Syria (10%), Lebanon (39%), and Iraq (3%). If those early Muslim conquests (or even later Muslim rulers) forced conversion on anyone, there would be no Christian communities in those countries. Their existence is proof of Islam not spreading by the sword in these areas.

        North Africa and Spain

        The soldiers and leaders of these early conquests in Egypt, Syria, Iraq, and Persia were from the first generation of Muslims. Many of them were even companions of the Prophet. What would happen as Muslim expansion continued in later generations, as Muslim armies fought the Byzantines further West, in North Africa and later, in Spain?

        The majority of the population of the North African coast in the 600s were Berbers. While the Byzantine Empire controlled most of the coast from Egypt to Algeria, the people of those areas were generally not loyal to the Byzantines who had great trouble trying to subdue the region. Political and social upheaval in the century before Islam led to a devastated region, which was probably just a shell of its former glory as a Roman province.

        The first Umayyad caliph, Muawiya, appointed a general, Uqba bin Nafi, to conquer the North African coast from the Byzantines in the 660s. Again, without getting into the details of the tactics and battles, within the course of a few decades, Muslim control over North Africa was solidified.

        The same pattern we saw in Southwest Asia continued in North Africa. Conversions were not forced on any of the local populations. No accounts, by either Muslim or non-Muslim sources, mention forced conversion of the Berbers. Indeed, many Berbers did convert to Islam quite quickly. That strengthened the Muslim armies, as huge numbers of newly-converted Berbers would join the armies sweeping across the continent. Had these Berbers been forced to convert, they certainly would not have had the zeal and enthusiasm for Islam that would cause them to join the armies and spread Islamic political control even further against the Byzantines.

        After the Muslim conquest of North Africa, came a proposal that would prove to change world history forever. In the early 700s, the Iberian Peninsula (present-day Spain and Portugal) was under the control of the Visigothic King Roderic. A nobleman from Iberia sent to the Muslim governor of North Africa, complaining about the oppressive and tyranical rule of Roderic. The nobleman promised to support a Muslim invasion against Roderic with his own troops if they intervened.

        After a few preliminary raids to gauge the local populations’ support for such an intervention, the Muslim general Tariq ibn Ziyad (who may possibly have been Berber himself), ferried an army across from Morocco to Iberia in 711. Within months, Tariq’s army had defeated King Roderic and opened up the country to Muslim control. Within 3 years, the entire Iberian Peninsula was under Muslim control. Many cities, hearing of the justice of Muslim rule, voluntarily opened their doors and welcomed Muslim armies, who ended what they saw as the oppressive rule of the Visigoths.

        More documentary evidence survives from this conquest proving that the conquest did not mean forced conversion. In April 713, a Muslim governor in the region negotiated a treaty with a Visigothic noble, which included the provision that the local people “will not be killed or taken prisoner. Nor will they be separated from their women and children. They will not be coerced in matters of religion, their churches will not be burned.”³

        We see again in the example of Muslim Spain (which would later be called al-Andalus) that the locals (mostly Christians, although a sizable Jewish population also existed) were not forced to convert to Islam. In fact, in later centuries, an almost utopian society of religious tolerance existed in al-Andalus, in which Muslims, Jews, and Christians all experienced a golden age of knowledge, culture, and philosophy. This enlightened land of religious tolerance would end centuries later with the Christian Reconquista which effectively ethnically cleansed Muslims and Jews from the entire peninsula.

        The Indian Subcontinent

        Today, two of the most populous Muslim countries in the world, Pakistan (2rd most Muslims), and India (3rd most Muslims), occupy the Indian subcontinent. Islam has had an incredible and lasting impact on the region in all aspects of life. However, even through centuries of Muslim rule by different empires and dynasties, Hinduism and other religions remain as important aspects of the subcontinent.

        The reasons for Muslim invasion into the subcontinent were justified by the time period’s rules of warfare. A ship filled with daughters of Muslim traders who were trading in Sri Lanka was attacked by pirates from Sindh (what is now Pakistan) who captured and enslaved the women. Seeking to liberate the women and punish the pirates, an expedition was sent out in 710, led by Muhammad bin Qasim, an Arab from the city of Ta’if.

        Bin Qasim’s military expedition into this distant and remote land was made successful by very important social issues in India. The caste system, which originated from Hindu belief, divided society up into very strictly controlled social classes. Those on top led wealthy, comfortable lives, while those on the bottom (particularly untouchables) were seen as the scourge of society. Added to this were the Buddhists, who were generally oppressed by the Hindu princes throughout the country. With the entrance of Muslim armies, which carried with them the promise of an equal society, many Buddhists and lower castes welcomed the Muslim armies. In fact, the first Muslims of Indian origin were probably from the lower castes, as Islam offered them an escape from the oppressive social system they were accustomed to.

        With the conquest of Sindh, Muhammad bin Qasim showed that Islamic law’s protection of religious minorities was not just for Christians and Jews. Buddhists and Hindus in the subcontinent were given religious freedom and were not forced to convert. In one case, a Buddhist community complained to bin Qasim of their fear that the Muslim armies would force Islam upon them and they would have to leave the practices of their ancestors. Bin Qasim held a meeting with the Buddhist and Hindu leaders of the town, and promised them religious freedom and asked them to continue leading their lives as they had previously.

        Like

      • Dear Sutan Mahmood, You can write (or copy and paste) pages and pages and pages of historical lies about who was provoked first. But what you can not do is accuse Hindus (Buddhists, Christians, Jews, Zoroasters…etc) for using brutal barbaric force (terrorism in the west and in their own lands) to try to take over the world in the name of THEIR god-Allah TODAY. In the year of our lord 2017. Only ONE religion is still doing that today in 2017. And it is not Hindus.

        Lying about history, and even teaching these lies to our children in grade school here in America is all part of The Muslim Brotherhoods plan of Civilization Jihad. They will take over our country and government, “by our (the infidel’s) own hand”.

        Like

  10. Hindus allowed Gautama Buddha to live happily amongst themselves and develop a new faith. Buddha lived peacefully and died in his eighties in central India. Muslims terrorized hindus by beheading all men and enslaving their women. The boys were castrated and were used as eunuchs to guard their harems. They brought down varanasi temple seven times and it stood up every single time albeit weaker and smaller. They were plundering the temple wealth and decapitating hindu priests and kings to gain subjugation.Muslim rule is not talked about much nowadays because of the political correctness. How else a minority can rule over a majority.

    Do you all know the very rich language of Sanskrit doesn’t have a word for jihad or crusade, for religious war is unheard of among hindus until muslim savagers attacked India. Even recently the ‘tall buddha statues’ were brought down by Taliban in Afghanistan. Given a chance muslims would like to wage a religious war on others even today. Thankfully they dont own a huge country like china or India. The world is saved!!
    Yes religious debates were and are very very common among hindus not wars.Search for ‘charvakas’.

    satee sahagamanam or suttee became more common with widows self immolating during muslim invasions. They were beheading men especially the king class and were converting the royal women their sex slaves.

    Like

    • The reasons for Muslim invasion into the subcontinent were justified by the time period’s rules of warfare. A ship filled with daughters of Muslim traders who were trading in Sri Lanka was attacked by pirates from Sindh (what is now Pakistan) who captured and enslaved the women. Seeking to liberate the women and punish the pirates, an expedition was sent out in 710, led by Muhammad bin Qasim, an Arab from the city of Ta’if.

      Bin Qasim’s military expedition into this distant and remote land was made successful by very important social issues in India. The caste system, which originated from Hindu belief, divided society up into very strictly controlled social classes. Those on top led wealthy, comfortable lives, while those on the bottom (particularly untouchables) were seen as the scourge of society. Added to this were the Buddhists, who were generally oppressed by the Hindu princes throughout the country. With the entrance of Muslim armies, which carried with them the promise of an equal society, many Buddhists and lower castes welcomed the Muslim armies. In fact, the first Muslims of Indian origin were probably from the lower castes, as Islam offered them an escape from the oppressive social system they were accustomed to.

      With the conquest of Sindh, Muhammad bin Qasim showed that Islamic law’s protection of religious minorities was not just for Christians and Jews. Buddhists and Hindus in the subcontinent were given religious freedom and were not forced to convert. In one case, a Buddhist community complained to bin Qasim of their fear that the Muslim armies would force Islam upon them and they would have to leave the practices of their ancestors. Bin Qasim held a meeting with the Buddhist and Hindu leaders of the town, and promised them religious freedom and asked them to continue leading their lives as they had previously.
      https://thedebateinitiative.com/2015/01/07/how-islam-was-not-spread-by-the-sword/

      Like

      • Are you aware ofthe divisions in muslim society….if yes then dont take the backing if divisios in hindu society.if not then get urself updated…..

        Like

  11. “By the time the British arrived to the shores of India and after centuries of Islamic law ruling India, the Hindu population was not behaving like their normal self; they were behaving like Muslims. There are many witness reports from the British archives of horrendous Hindu incidents that were shocking in cruelty to the British – and they therefore sometimes referred to the people as “savages”. Yes, anyone who gets contaminated by the association with Islamic ‘culture’ truly gets tainted and savaged. That is exactly why it is so detrimental and dangerous” so the indians were a great people and because of muslims they are poor and savaged now, the guy who wrote this article is simply ridiculous.

    Like

  12. What goes around comes around, that’s why all Muslim countries fight with each other, bombing and slaughtering each other, look at all Muslim countries full of terrorism, Karma leaves no one

    Like

  13. I am amazed; really what is happening with us. Let us all for a moment accept that whatever this article mentions is all true but going into past and bringing out such horrible events from it, is it going to help. What is this article trying to achieve; nothing is ever achieved by hate it just puts us into misery and we can’t see the bigger picture and fail to understand what is right and what is wrong.
    I mean how many times Muslims will have to clarify that whatever these so called Muslims are doing in the name of Islam is not what the Quran says and whosoever is quoting verses Quran is doing without the complete context. We only understand Islam and Quran from people who themselves know nothing about it. I am a Muslim but whatever I know about Quran and Islam isn’t at all what these so called representatives of Islam say or do.Well still the percentage of Muslims who are peace loving and want peace all around is well above to those terror spreading Muslims so rather than focusing our attention on that small percentage sicks we should think about how the peace can be brought. What do you think; does such kind of atrocities barbarism makes us happy when on every occurrence of act of terrorism we have to prove ourselves that we in now way represent that section of society.
    Just on a lighter note don’t you all think if terrorism/killing/forcing religion on others is really what Islam or Quran encourages then what would have happened if all Muslims start following this version of Quran and Islam. You know this well Islam is the second largest religion in the world so you can very well imagine the outcome. So you should be happy that majority of Muslims even if they are weak in practices they still are sticking to what Quran says.
    So If everyone just become selfish and starts thinking about himself/herself and ones family and their happiness and stay focused for the same believe me there will be lesser hate around you.

    Like

    • If at all entire …musalman..are .eradicated from..world..then there would be …no..crimes…on
      .earth
      .these ..bastards ..responsible..for..terrorism…in..world’s..with..even..800…years..of..rule..and..genocides..you..can’t.convert..India.to..Islamic..state..even…now we are 80%..so..you..bloody..bitches..youc..can’t…makeee

      Even

      1 hair..from..us

      Like

    • FARHAN USMANI,heirs the crux.I, by definition, am Secular. Pardon me saying so, but it’s a bitter truth. And equally bitter is the fact that Muslims play all types of Cards to suit them as per the circumstances, more so in India. Be it the minority card or be it to sound Secular, as you are trying to be one, by advising to forget the wrong doing’s done by a particular community over the years. Facts need not to be distorted. present circumstances demand, that you very conveniently put posers, to the past wrong doing’s of a particular Community. Quran is the sanest holy book among all others, but it has aways been GROSSLY misinterpreted by one and all to suit the circumstantial needs of the people in question.

      Like

    • Quran teaches terrorism.Kill or convert the Kaafirs or infidel And establish the rule of Shariya …marry your own siblings ,4 marriages are allowed ,Divorce by just saying Talaq 3 times ,zihaad is sacrosanct …kill and get killed to get 72 virgins ,Circumcision of even female genita , Butchering innocent animals like cow to please Allah ..Is this religion or Barbarism ..
      Islam is like Cancer to the humanity
      Major operation and Chemotherapy to weed it out is need of the hour

      Liked by 1 person

      • THE ‘ISLAMIC STATE’ is the true MUSLIM….each word in the quran and deeds of muhammed clearly match with IS.!..99% of the world muslims are un avaire what realy quran is..! because they are illiterate..non arabs..! every fool can think that all the atrocities are god said. THE BIBLE AND THE QURAN AND THE COMMUNIST MANIFESTO all are the jewish creation to conquer the world …the basis of all …is THE OLD TESTAMENT !..this is the virus that infected the humanity…nothing to do with the so called ALLA OR YAHWEY OR any thing …pure lust only …! BLOOD THIRSTY BEASTS…KILLINGS FOR GOD ! chosen people.true faith.self proclaimed owners of human wealth

        Like

      • Subramanian i didnt got what you said, are you saying jews made changes in quoran so to rule the world?

        Like

    • “not what the Quran says” — unfortunately it is exactly what the Koran says and repeatedly. You would like to argue that for a thousand years Muslims just could not bring themselves to read the Koran and follow its teachings. For a very lengthy period of time the Islamic teachers and scholars just could not comprehend the Koran. Well, apparently Muhammad had the same difficulty. Sorry but you are mistaken.

      Like

    • Following of a wrong religion must be abolished, abandoned by a Law of the land. Islam followers continue to say what is seen as doing ne by its – so called the followers – is not per Qurran, it is a hoax, deceipt, and false. ISIS is another such Worldwide attempt in the modern Century by the same logic what prevailed in the previous perpetrators. Directors like Sanjay Leela Bhansali should make movies showing the minds of these intruders, and not bother about Padmavati. It is just stupid.

      Like

    • Mr Usmam, Why don’t you accept the reality that it is in their blood to RULE, to slave the weak, torture those that don’t follow their brand, etc. for all that is Muslim. I think it is the UGLIEST brand of religion.

      Like

    • Farhan, This is what Koran says : try reading it in the language you understand and in chronological order. All that is written above will become clear to you – an din case u want to copy of it – mail me at motorint (at) gmail.com

      Like

      • The Quran is NOT in chronological order…nor is it in any order.Even the most revered Islamic scholars who can read Classical Arabic inform us that out of every 5 verses only 4 make any sense.That what is written in one part of it is refuted or disputed in another part of it…It is bipolar…teaching the Muslim to love one another…but to kill non Muslims.The real problem in the entire message from GOD passed down to the Angel Gabriel..then passed down to Mohammad then passed down to several different generations all speaking different dialects and variations of Arabic…finally to reach Uman 200 years after Mohammad to be written down from all the written extracts.Uman destroyed 98% of the written material and condensed two hundred years of this and that to make a book that makes two thirds of the world ..enemies of Allah….offers no salvation or forgiveness to non Muslims.
        That’s pretty selective of GOD…the GOD of the bible lives ALL men and does NOT incite men to kill other men…but to love one another.If ISLAM was really about peace..it would not incite men to kill.

        Like

    • चलिए मैं आपकी बातसे सहमत हो जाता हूँ कि आप अमन पसन्द जने हैं और मैं इस बात के लिए आपकी तारीफ करता हूँ। इतिहास को जानना जरूरी है,नफरत के लिए नहीं,ताकि हम उससे सबक ले सकें। हम सभी को आपके उदार इस्लाम की जरूरत है, पर मुद्दा ये है कि वर्तमान हालात को देखते हुए ये साफ पता पड़ता है,कि आज इस्लाम पर वही कट्टरवाद हावी हो चुका है और इसका प्रभाव लगातार बढ़ रहा है और इसे बढा़वा दिया जा रहा है। और ये एक बहुत कड़वा सच है कि भारत में तभी तक अमन-शांति है,जबतक यहाँ हिन्दु बहुमत है,नहीं तो भारतीयों को फिरसे कत्लो गारत का नया इतिहास झेलना पडे़गा।

      Like

    • well i have never read the quran but i do have common sense and logic, lets assume that the quran does not state any of these and certain factions are manipulating the quran to bring about war. hinduism is the third largest religion after islam, can u name a single hindu terrorist who has manipulated the gita, apart from the thousands of other hindu books and created an organization like al qaeda????

      Like

  14. ” The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis ”

    First of all , they were ” only ” … at the very most … 1.5 million Jews that died in camps , mostly from typhus and starvation ( brought upon by Allied bombings of the infrastructures ) , but moreover , the ” Nazis ” … were the Jews !!!

    Y’all need to do some serious homework , and learn that the hard core of the Nazi apparatus was run by Zionists , who were waging war agaisnt the Traditionalist Jews
    that were assimilating too well in European ” culture ” for Zionik taste …

    The ” Sonderkommandos ” in the camps were Zionists killing Tradionalists …

    The ” zi ” in ” nazi ” actually stood for ” zionist ” , and it was all funded by them !!!

    The Muslim invasion of India was a much more dreadful event …

    Like

    • Your ignorance is stunning! NAZI was an abbreviation for the National Socialist German Workers Party, which in German was Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartel. Hitler put his plan for the Jews in writing: Mein Kampf. I have a degree in history. Go study this some more.

      Like

  15. The Author of tis Article declares “The genocide suffered by the Hindus and Sikhs of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.
    The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis.”
    This is Completely and Factually Untrue! The Genocide in Russia under Stalin killed an estimated 20 million innocent people.The Genocide in China under Chairman Mao was estimated to be between 70 to 90 million innocent people! The fact that the Author would choose to slant his article especially to politicize and propagandize (and very inaccurately) especially for the Jews and Israel makes the content and direction of his article extremely suspect!

    Liked by 2 people

    • It is all deep state politics. Do a little research and you will find that the Vatican (Catholic Church) had much to do with the creation of Islam. So let’s be sure and give credit where credit is due. Just sayin!

      Like

      • Vatican has nothing to do with the creation of Islam. Catholic church didn’t even exist when Islam was created. Read any text on Christianity before writing such a nonsense.

        Like

      • Just do a quick check of Wikipedia history of islam and history of Roman Catholic Church. Roman Catholic Church predates Islam and officially became state religion in 380. The church itself more or less evolved from a combination of early Christianity and adopted pagan practices.

        Like

    • If this author thinks that the only comparable genocide was the genocide of Jews by Nazis (many top Nazis were Jewish), I don’t give this any credibility at all. The Moslem invaders treated the population well in other countries they invaded, so why would they be so much more horrible in India? The Moslem invaders brought the enlightenment to Europe, and most of the knowledge was from India!

      Like

  16. ” We control Islam ,we will use it to destroy all the western nations. When the better part of Islam and Christianity is destroyed ,we will unleash the full measure of the doctrine of Satan ” Albert Pike Grand Master Mason, Grand Dragon of the KKK, Satanist .
    We are in a lot of trouble they have been scheming for a very longtime .

    Liked by 1 person

    • True. Pike knew that Masons were connected to the Kabbalah. That goes back to Egypt. Re India. I read while in India, how the Western Persians and Brahmans invaded North India, millennia ago. Archaeologists had rather recently discovered they went to village after village, killing all or most of the people. There is also a rediscovered historical version of a King in South India (not Muslim) who performed so many atrocities and murders of his own multitude, that at the end of his life he repented and went on some kind of a pilgrimage, leaving them to their own lot. We need to read very much history it seems.

      Like

      • Sheer nonsense. You are totally unaware of the history of India and I don’t think you are qualified enough to speak about South India.

        Like

      • Hindus allowed Gautama Buddha to live happily amongst themselves and develop a new faith. Buddha lived peacefully and died in his eighties in central India. Muslims terrorized hindus by beheading all men and enslaving their women. The boys were castrated and were used as eunuchs to guard their harems. They brought down varanasi temple seven times and it stood up every single time albeit weaker and smaller. They were plundering the temple wealth and decapitating hindu priests and kings to gain subjugation.Muslim rule is not talked about much nowadays because of the political correctness. How else a minority can rule over a majority.

        King Ashoka turned buddhist after a bloody war in Kalinga, You may be referring to that. Do you know the very rich language of Sanskrit doesn’t have a word for jihad or crusade, for religious war is unheard of among hindus until muslim savagers attacked India. Even recently the ‘tall buddha statues’ were brought down by Taliban in Afghanistan. Given a chance muslims would like to wage a religious war on others. Thankfully they dont own a huge country like china or India. The world is saved!!
        Yes religious debates were and are very very common among hindus not wars.Search for ‘charvakas’.

        Like

    • you are an ignorant person and better do not comment . Little knowledge is a dangerous thing . Brahmins (Hindus ) have always been people of peace . We have sought welfare of all humanity regardless of their place of origin or religion.

      Like

  17. I think Hindus are bad at documenting history correctly. I would like to first thank Admin & all contributors for taking time to gather data. Although in case of India, i think it is lost cause since leftist have distorted history and very few Hindus will believe these numbers. I hope western society will argue and come up grasp on how islam has worked for centuries.

    My good wishes to you.

    Like

  18. Muslims are cruel barbaric having a deep hatred for Hindus. They are Hindus before Mohammad started his religion ISLAM after he was humiliated by Hindu Kings.He then vowed to wipe out Hinds from earth and made his disciple cruel barbaric by teaching them cruelty from birth by cutting penis. Hindus are cowards peace loving people who were never strong united and aggressive. Congress made them more divided by sowing hatred among themselves by caste creed race and ideology.Before British and Congress came there was no casteism. In Muslim period they were either Hindus or Muslims.But Christians came and started divide and rule policy.Now Communists seculrista spraed hatred among all for Hindus.We hoped that Narendra Modi will stop bigotry but he is also proved to be a Vajpayee.Now Hindus have no future except to convert to Islam else they are destined to die by swords of Muslims

    Like

  19. Islam has to be exposed world wide for what it is; A truly evil supremacist ideology, a lot worse than even Nazism. Thank God finally those in the west are realising this and hopefully in the near future Islam can be erradicated and confined to a very sad part of our history, and humanity can finally move on. Otherwise society be aware as this poison eventually destroys anything good in any culture and society.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. “India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion. By the mid 1500’s the Hindu population was 200 million.”- This might have to do something about misogyny also. Yet, the population of the subcontinent is about 150 crores in 2016. We need to cull the misogynist population now.

    Like

  21. Muslims rulers were great muthafuckers
    They used to fuck their own mother & sisters as todays muslims do. In reality muslims are cowards and so their dooms day have come. Soon they will be vanished from world map.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Really they fuck their mother & sisters. I knew Muslims liked “keeping it in the family” – AKA 1st and 2nd Cousin Marriage, however I was not aware of mother & sisters marriage/fucking.

      Please can you post me some links, I tried googling and got nothing…

      Like

    • Yes, the slaughter was greater than Mao.

      I would point out that half of the Nazi slaughter were Christian. 6 million Christians in addition to the 6 million Jews.

      Ironically, today’s Liberals and Muslims want to deny both the Nazi holocaust and the Muslim holocausts …

      Wayne, Luvsiesous

      Liked by 2 people

      • When I was growing up the Holocaust death toll of the camps was 3 million and included Jews, gypsies, Christians, and Polish. These were not ‘death camps’ origionally but became such with desease and starvation…with the German population running low on food and supplies so did the camps. These were not ‘pleasure palaces’ either… while some have claimed that there were hospitials, gyms, etc there for the workers to use, in reality the facilities were essentially broken, toilets didn’t work…there was only one commode for each cabin and again, short on supplies. Any prisoner that was deemed a potential threat of any type was hanged or short (not gassed). To get an accurate idea of the situation, read Cori ten Booms ‘A prisoner and Yet ” and/or “A thousand Shall Fall”.
        There was a special unit that truly did exterminate any Jew they could get their hands on, and it was not in the camps, but a unit that followed after the German army as it gained ground in the neighboring countrysides, rounding up and shooting all the Hebrews that lived in the captured villages.

        Like

      • The true lesson of history and the Holocaust is that no government should have complete and total control over a population. Hitler was the entity the Bible said would worship a strange god…the God of Fortresses (strength). The NWO is the forth Reich.

        Like

      • The holocaust is in recent history and still fresh in people’s minds who are direct descendants of those who suffered at the hands of the nazis….yet education systems are trying to keep a lid on these events and young people today do not have a clue about World War Two…..so it doesn’t take an einstein mind to figure out why Indians and Pakistanis have forgotten these atrocities against their forefathers.History was wiped out almond with the Hindu Those descendants of Hindu are only alive today BECAUSE they converted to Islam…and Islam does a very good job at sweeping truth and history under their magic carpet.

        Like

  22. they are trying to cover what they have done in the Philippines (except south) and Spain.

    Muslims vanished in those countries.

    while in India the biggest numbers are Hindus.

    Truth will always rise and false will always be discovered

    don’t waste time

    everyone knows that Israel, US and thier alayze are killing people in heaps.

    you just needs eyes and some brain to realise that but unfortunately you are a loss.

    Like

    • A quarter plus BILLION killed. On a planet where the total population didn’t pass one billion till the nineteenth century.

      Like

      • regard. 90% of the worlds conflicts were solved by muslims. dont believe me. Just read what Gandhi has said about Caliph Omar. Dumb retarded dot head like you will just be burning in envy while he is alive and definitely on funeral pyre after death. disguisting blog created by literally aping islamophobic sites created by stop islamization forces. Hope you make good money sucking off other abrahamics.

        Like

    • Hm, did you take your Mohammedan pills today that feed you the conspiracy theories? If there was no Muslims in the world, 90% of all conflicts would end. Why do Muslims end up in non-Muslim countries where you are not suppose to be? With intent to occupy and take over.

      Liked by 3 people

      • There is hardly a pure blooded Hindu who doesn’t hate Muslims..Few Hindus who have some admixture of blood through their ancestors only support Muslims only for votes. But when time comed,they’ll realise their fault.

        Like

    • Let me dissect what you said bit by bit:
      1)- Spain was NOT a Muslim country initially though your ancestors did attack and rule Spain for quite some period of time and about “what they have done in Spain” is taking control of their motherland-https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umayyad_conquest_of_Hispania
      (read the aftermath part)
      and yes Muslim vanished in those countries cause they were INVADERS and they ought to be vanished. They were your Moorish brethren from North Africa.

      2)-
      And yes, in India the biggest numbers are Hindus, so you got a problem with that? India = Hindustan= “The Land of Hindus” though we do tolerate your religion people as our brothers because that’s what we are taught to do.

      3)-
      Yep, the americans and Israelites are banging your brethren there because they are terrorists and that’s how they ought to be treated.

      4)-
      I totally agree with your point that “truth will always rise and false be discovered” so yes, all people (except of course your-minded) know the dirty truth about ISLAM-conquests, rape, slavery -permitted by your so called Holy Quran!

      5)-And yes, you are right you must stop wasting time and learn to live peacefully among us or else as you said-“truth will rise”!!!

      Like

      • Rightly said, just want to add something to what you said,

        We r tought to treat muslim indians to be our country men n brothers but they will not understand this coz they are taught to hate hindus and anyone who is not muslim

        Like

    • Anyone who cares to read history including accessing source documents such as contemporary accounts of what was happening during the period 650 A.D. through around 1600 A.D. can rapidly discern for themselves that Islam is not a religion of peace, but rather a cynical tool of unification of 7th century barbarian desert tribes into a expansionist horde intent upon conquering and enslaving the entire world in the name of Allah and his prophet Mohammed.
      The deaths, misery and atrocities carried out by these savages continued until Western civilization gained sufficient organization and technical ability to first recover the territories seized by the Muslims, then conquer their homelands and attempt to subject them to some civilizing influences. During this period (approximately 250 years) the Muslims were rendered mostly incapable of massive mischief.
      Due to the fact that the Muslim peoples are in the main locked in a 7th century tribal culture, as well as a static barracks religion of conquest and pillage very little real progress in civilizing these barbarians actually occurred. The decline of the Western European powers following the 2 world wars fought in the 20th century, and the presence of huge amounts of oil in some of the Muslim lands resulted in a resurgence of Muslim expansionism in the latter half of the 20th century.. Almost invariably the Muslim countries emerging from colonial rule became autocratic theocracies essentially ruled by religious leaders who through a variety of methods reinstated social conditions and practices going back to their origins in the 7th century. Oppression of other religions in areas controlled by Muslims was reinstituted, Oppression and killing of other peoples in areas controlled by Muslim theocrats became common. Efforts to expand their religion and influence again became the norm.
      India, recognizing the problem with coexistence with the Muslims came to the correct conclusion that containment of the Muslims was the only solution, that Muslims could never peacefully coexist in a multi-religious, and multi-cultural society; hence the partition into India and East/West Pakistan. Even this solution was flawed, and East Pakistan became Bangladesh. The West complacent after around 250 years of relative freedom from Muslim savagery deluded itself and by rewriting or ignoring the history of this benighted religion tried assimilation. France especially was a leader in this folly, and the results may clearly be seen in that unfortunate country. The EU nevertheless continues the experiment, a course of action that is destroying the social fabric of the participating countries.
      The United States, unfortunately, in the grip of deluded liberalism and under Democratic presidencies compounded the problem by a botched invasion of Iraq leading to the rise of ISIS. ISIS gives the world a view of what attempted toleration and coexistence with the Muslim religion results in. Nevertheless, liberals and leftists in Europe and the US refuse to recognize the reality of what unfettered Muslim power means.
      The ultimate solution to the problem posed by this pernicious religion and its followers is fairly apparent: The Muslim countries must be quarantined and contained much as India has done with Pakistan. Trade and technology transfer to the Muslim countries should be held to an absolute minimum. Countries which attempt to sell or transfer technology to them must be prohibited from doing so. Travel and emigration from these countries into other countries should be prohibited, with the exception of people of non-=Muslim religions who wish to leave due to persecution or oppression. And finally, any attempt to obtain weapons of mass destruction by any Muslim country should be ruthlessly crushed. Pakistan illustrates the problems inherent in a Muslim country in possession of nuclear weapons. Iran would be an even larger problem, and the deal cut between the Obama administration and Iran should be undone, and that country prevented from attaining nuclear capability.
      Failure to take these steps will inevitably result in a war within the next 20 years in which at least 200 million people will die. Among them will be most of the 8 million Jews in Israel, hundreds of millions of Muslims, and at least hundreds of thousands of Americans, Europeans and Indians.
      This is not Islamophobia. It is simply a realization of the fact that people locked into a 7th century barbarian mindset due to the tenets of their religion cannot and will not peacefully coexist with democratic and free thinking societies.

      Liked by 1 person

      • “Anyone who cares to read history including accessing source documents such as contemporary accounts of what was happening during the period 650 A.D. through around 1600 A.D. can rapidly discern for themselves that Islam is not a religion of peace”, i think you need to read a series books and documents before say “islam is not religión of peace”, “Muslims barbarics” bla bla bla, stop repeating what Daniel Pipes says.

        Like

    • Dear Salim,

      The “occupied territories” in Gaza are actually “buffer zones” to protect the inner cities from Muslims from blowing up their little girls and boys to kill infidels in Israel. You are the one that needs eyes and a brain.

      Liked by 1 person

  23. The figures mentioned are wild exaggerations. The coward who would not attach his/her name to this article is an anti-Muslim fanatic. Anyone wanting to know the truth should ignore this article altogether.

    Liked by 1 person

    • And anyone who believes you are “professor Donald Graham” is mentally feeble. The truth about Muslim brutality around the world is hard to hear, isn’t it, when you have lived an entire life pretending to be a victim?

      Liked by 2 people

    • Professor Donald Graham, I know you would not believe me.Hence, I recommend you to please read books left by Muslim Chroniclers and Western Historian, archeologist and translators. You will find full detail there what has just been mentioned here.

      P.S. Do not over react on some unbelievable things, it might be possible you have never been told such truth but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. You gave got whole world in front of you, You may search online too.

      Lets face a fact now, We have found a whopping number of Buddha Idols in and around Afganistan Pakistan area. Some say number of Idol is more than 25000 but surprisingly there is not a single Buddhist temple in the area and a very small number of ruins.

      Can you speculate what happened there from 6th to 16th Century? before making any guess on such questions Remember fate of Bamiyan.
      For your information, the Persian word “BUT (Idol) is quite similar to “Budda”.

      Liked by 1 person

      • These all are stories based made by enemies of Islam nothing like such never heard ….all self made by enemies of Islam ..Muslim rule 800 yr still in India 85 % non Muslims ..hahaha anyone can put anyone name ..to know truth better visit superlogic.chatovod.com

        Like

      • And how do you prove that the Muslim population remain at 15% for 50 years in a country where people don’t even hold identification cards?
        You claim the stories are fabricated. Then how do you justify the bragging by Muslim historians that claim Muslims murdered over 400 million people in India and cut so many heads that ‘even seated on a horse’ they could not see above the pile?

        Like

      • Imran babu..its not 15%..India included pakistan and bangladesh also..Add them and see the results..Dont confuse people.Accept the truth.

        Like

    • This has got to be the stupidest most ridiculous article of hate I have read. These a clearly lies and you have no proof of such atrocities. Show your mass graves of killed Indians.

      Like

      • Well Yousef do you really expect to find mass graves from hundreds of years ago, especially of those who were burned to death, thrown in rivers that went to the sea. I don’t think so, many were probably NEVER buried at all, natural forces disintegrated the bones.

        Like

      • Read Zaharnama, Baburnama, Futuh Al buldan . all written by Muslims. You will find full reference to Hindu Massacre

        Like

      • When the dead are left to rot on top of the earth, there are no mass graves. And after 500 -1000 years what graves there are would be difficult to find, and the remnants mostly gone through decay and natural processes. However, when you read the accounts of the conquerors (who frequently love to brag about their atrocities) it becomes quite believable. This is true of the Muslims, the Assyrians, the Babylonians, the Hittites etc.

        Why don’t you accept the possibility, and check the source documents cited in the article? The answer is because you do not wish to know the enormity of what Islam has perpetrated in the world. Remain in ignorance child of misbelief.

        Inshallah. .

        Like

      • Only an illiterate Muslim like you will say that. In stead of apologizing for what your ancestors did,you have the temerity to ask proof?Go and read Islamic gtreatise of that period.You’ll hate yourself.

        Like

      • And here Mr. BRIAN STEWARD says Hindus burnt alive thier widows. Mr. Steward that’s true that some Hindus did so out of complete ignorance but we, as citizens in the 21st century condemn those acts and do lament that part of our history, when the Hindus were immersed in pitch darkness of ignorance and lack of knowledge, just like Europe was before the Renaissance period. But today we know that Europeans are the most knowledgable people around and they too lament their middle age history, so what we do not blame them about what their ancestors did, do we?

        The problem here is that Muslim historians even today do not apologize, rather they boast of the Hindus (and other so-called infidels=non-Muslims!) they have killed and raped.

        Like

    • You are right things done in the name of religion does not make a religion bad, but when things done in the name of religion- conquest (to make all non-believers follow Islam), rape (as the Quran says: “on whom your rightful hand posseses…”), are supported by religion it does indeed make the religion bad. And wait, religion? I won’t even call it a religion, its rather, an IDEOLOGY OF CONQUEST that your people follow.

      Like

      • Disagree: ” bad things done in the name of religion” do define the religion as bad. When the doctrine incites bad behavior, is it not the doctrine that is bad?

        Like

  24. Can I ask this great historian, the author of this article when did the first census started in India. When you find and answer to that question then I have got the second question for you what was the population of Britain before they invaded India. Find an answer you sick twisted twat then write an ariticale.

    Like

    • Hahahaha butt hurt. The reason for this article is a response to all you cry baby muslims, who thinks the only people in the world who have a clean squeaky history is your lot. Think again goat boy.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Guys you should count all the Muslims from Afghanistan to Bangladesh if its 1500 years history. Before that, at the time of Vikramadithaya and Ashoka even middle east was under Hindhus rule. Muslims that are commenting here on this forum are dissendents (great grand children) of Hindhus. Their Ancestors converted with the first sign of blades. All Afghanistan, Pakistan, India & Bangladesh Muslims are converted from Hindhus.

      Like

    • The British conquest and colonization of India was far from compassionate or humane. It resulted in millions of deaths of Hindus due to wars and famines.

      However it had two notable good consequences. First it freed India of the Muslim rulers generally. Second, it left in India a framework which the Hindu people took and used to emerge as the world’ largest democracy. India is on the way to becoming a world super power as a result. Truly, the pupil will excel the teacher.

      What Muslim country is on its way to becoming a world super power? The answer is none. And please DON’T try to cite Iran. Iran is a theocratic nightmare of repression and butality. s

      Like

      • Thanks for keeping us on our toes.

        http://www.islam-watch.org/books/islamic-jihad-legacy-of-forced-conversion-imperialism-slavery.pdf

        References:

        1) Bostom, A. G. ‘The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic holy war and the fate of the non-Muslims.’ Prometheus Books. New York. 2005.
        2) Khan, M. A. ‘Islamic Jihad: A legacy of forced conversion, imperialism and slavery.’ iUniverse, Bloomington, IN. 2009. (An Indian ex-Muslim)
        3) Lal [a], K.S. Muslims invade India p 433-455 in Bostom (1) above.
        4) Lal [b], K.S. Jihad under the Turks and jihad under the Mughals p 456-461 in Bostom (1) above.
        5) Lal [c], K.S. Slave-taking during Muslim rule p535-548 in Bostom (1) above.
        6) Lal [d], K.S. Enslavement of Hindus by Arab and Turkish invaders p 549-554 in bostom (1) above.
        7) Lal [e], K.S. The Origins of Muslim slave system p 529-534 in bostom (1) above.
        8) Reliance of the Traveller: A classic manual of Islamic sacred law. In Arabic with facing English Text, commentary and appendices edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller Al-Misri, Ahmad ibn Naqib; Amana publications Maryland USA 1994.
        9) Sookhdeo, P. ‘Global Jihad: The future in the face of Militant Islam.’ Isaac Publishing. 2007.
        10) Trifkovic, S. ‘The sword of the prophet.’ Regina Orthodox Press, Inc. 2002.
        11) Ye’or, Bat. ‘Islam and Dhimmitude: Where civilisations collide’ translated from the French by Miriam Kochan and David Littman. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press 2002, reprint 2005.

        Like

  25. Indians (Hindus) were slaughtered during the muslim rule ,11th Century to !8th Century ,their property looted,women raped and enslaved .Of that there is no doubt.We even today see the sights of demolished temples.How many men were killed and how many women were raped will never be known.This only stopped after the British appeared on the scene.The British also spread a reign of terror after Indian Mutiny of 1857.However they were less savage and cruel than muslim rulers earlier..The Hindus have not learnt any lesson from the History.The Hindus must be united , proud of their heritage and militarily strong if they want to exist in this world.Otherwise they will be wiped out.Only a matter of time,may be few more centuries.

    Liked by 2 people

    • “History makes it clear however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of the sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated.”

      De Lacy O’Leary, Islam at the Crossroads, London, 1923 p 8.

      ” But Islam has a still further service to render to the cause of humanity. It stands after all nearer to the real East than Europe does, and it possesses a magnificent tradition of inter-racial understanding and cooperation. No other society has such a record of success in uniting in an equality of status, of opportunity, and of endeavors so many and so various races of mankind… Islam has still the power to reconcile apparently irreconcilable elements of race and tradition. If ever the opposition of the great societies of East and West is to be replaced by cooperation, the mediation of Islam is an indispensable condition. In its hands lies very largely the solution of the problem with which Europe is faced in its relation with East. If they unite, the hope of a peaceful issue is immeasurably enhanced. But if Europe, by rejecting the cooperation of Islam, throws it into the arms of its rivals, the issue can only be disastrous for both.”

      H.A.R. Gibb, Whither Islam, London, 1932, p 379.

      “I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal, to every age. I have studied him the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an Antichrist, he must be called the Saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad tliat it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today.”

      G.B. .Shaw, The Genuine Islam, Vol.1, No. 81936.

      Like

      • Those were old times and society was of different nature. What people thought in 1930’s is of no relevance to us today. We do not need to know what G.B. Shaw thought about Islam or muhammad. He is not an authority on everything just because he was well known in literature and wrote wonderful plays. You do not go and ask Shaw for hi opinions on running the economic framework of a country or asking him how to run a lab. His opinions are personal and confined within his frame of knowledge and thinking. They do not reflect any objective compulsion to make Islam the best and truest of all. The problem with muslims is that they lack independent and critical thinking and courage to step out and say about things that are anachronistic in their system. Today, islam is the most dumbing religion on the planet.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Thank you for your obvious propaganda. Unfortunately it did not sway me, and I still don’t want to rush out and kiss a muslim…

        Like

    • As many, I have a bit interest in History—also become so upset to learn the mispresentation, espacially the facts and figures prented there. You will see that Piggot, Wheeler etc have mentioned Massacare by the Aryans in Sind Civilization. Epic Ramayana presents that Rama’s younger brother Varata killed some 30 million people in Kekoya to save his maternal uncles throne. Anyway,world history population reprents the figure ( http://www.worldhistorysite.com/population.html) that India belonged 24% of Population in 400 BC ; reduced to 21% of the total population in 200 AD and again sharp rise was in 800 AD( 29%). The pick was in 1000 AD with 30% . The Muslims ended rulling India leaving 27% of the entire world population here in this land. Despite the removal of widow burning, Narabali , about what Shripantha, writer of book Thagi mentioned that India lost 40,000 human beeing every year in the name of sacrifice to daity Bhawani, india’s population have been deminishing. Now its 21%. India never have touched the population what it had during the Muslim rule. So all the statistics represented their need acid test- Either the statics of massacares, or the world history of population. As a human being I do belive in Humanity more than the issues of religion and religious feudal issues. Awlad Dhaka.

      Like

      • Aryan invasion is a doubtful theory, my friend. Also, its not about religion …its about political aspirations hidden behind the garb of religion that leads to massacres. If all us own up our misdeed and do follow the idea of live and let live, this planet would be a better place. Even with islam being the absolute religion on this planet will not lead us away from conflicts, but only serve as a tool to manipulate people.

        Like

      • And do that population include the no. of muslims and converted muslims(forcely)..u yourself have given the answer..how many crores of muslims were there ..that led to sharp increase ..Your census talks about India not Hindus!!!we all know though muslims breed like P…!!!See the present census chart of last 100 years in India..!!You can neglect the facts though most of the listings provided above are from muslim writers and historians!!And still if u don’t get the point..watch around and plug in to any news channel or type terrorists in google…!!!!!!!!!!!!Islam Vs. Humanity

        Like

      • Stop trying to justify Islam’s murderous intentions with another culture’s acts of butchery. All forms of wholesale slaughter are evil, but Islam is the only religion that murders in the name of its god. No one, not even the much-maligned Crusader knights, the notorious Spanish Inquisition and the Mongol Hordes, comes even close to Islam when it comes to genocide, from the 7th Century AD to the present day……The Religion of Peace!!!

        Like

      • So, you mean to say that there was no Hindu massacre by Muslims in India.
        I see, no Muslim wants to accept the fact, completely ignoring the chronicles left by their own ancestors. You too, like other Muslims are in complete denial mode. This is really pathetic. Anyways, I am not here to prove my point to you. I am to make other Hindus aware of Islamic holocaust of Hindus for 800 years.

        Like

    • I am really sorry for our ancestors who fought and died for their honor, Some Ran to remote place and some accepted their domination and paid jijya.
      But Hinduism prevailed from all sort of problem, The only complaint I have from our literate ones that they didn’t not leave any source to know this massacre. All we see is Muslim chronicles or dilapidated temple site, smeared idols.

      Like

      • Well, for all we know, those records may have been destroyed. Also, history is told by the victors and the references used in this article show how gleefully the victors recorded it.
        Honestly, I couldn’t finish the entire article. It’s too triggering. Why are we humans like this?

        Like

  26. India…genocide…
    For all people who say British did religious massacre
    Know the correct history
    Arabs came for trade ,
    expanded their territory,
    spreaded Islam ,
    Massacred the indigenous people for a great scale,
    Looted, exploited and made their slaves
    greatest genocide of India

    Meanwhile…….

    British came for trade,
    Expanded their territory,
    Didn’t force any religious massacre,
    They ruled India ,
    They looted ,exploited the wealth but didn’t make slaves,
    They didn’t do any genocide

    Liked by 1 person

    • Mr. Mahatma Gandhi:

      “Someone has said that Europeans in South Africa dread the advent Islam — Islam that civilized Spain, Islam that took the torch light to Morocco and preached to the world the Gospel of brotherhood. The Europeans of South Africa dread the Advent of Islam. They may claim equality with the white races. They may well dread it, if brotherhood is a sin. If it is equality of colored races then their dread is well founded.”

      And in “Young India”, he wrote:

      “I wanted to know the best of one who holds today’s undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind….I became more than convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet, the scrupulous regard for his pledges, his intense devotion to this friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the 2nd volume (of the Prophet’s biography), I was sorry there was not more for me to read of the great life.”

      Like

      • As like many, I have a bit interest in History—also become so upset to learn the mispresentation, espacially the facts and figures prented there. You will see that Piggot, Wheeler etc have mentioned Massacare by the Aryans in Sind Civilization. Epic Ramayana presents that Rama’s younger brother Varata killed some 30 million people in Kekoya to save his maternal uncles throne. Anyway,world history population reprents the figure ( http://www.worldhistorysite.com/population.html) that India belonged 24% of Population in 400 BC ; reduced to 21% of the total population in 200 AD and again sharp rise was in 800 AD( 29%). The pick was in 1000 AD with 30% . The Muslims ended rulling India leaving 27% of the entire world population here in this land. Despite the removal of widow burning, Narabali , about what Shripantha, writer of book Thagi mentioned that India lost 40,000 human beeing every year in the name of sacrifice to daity Bhawani, india’s population have been deminishing. Now its 21%. India never have touched the population what it had during the Muslim rule. So all the statistics represented their need acid test- Either the statics of massacares, or the world history of population. As a human being I do belive in Humanity more than the issues of religion and religious feudal issues. Awlad Dhaka.

        Like

      • Taught brotherhood by killing people ? what a religion and religious followers? Would persons justifying such action would like to be treated in the same way?

        Like

      • Oh, I remember Gandhi, He dedicated his whole life in appeasing Muslims but even them could not prevent division of India. His goat was cooked and eaten by Muslims in Bengal. It was a threat that you leave Bengal. He got the message and within 6 days he ran from Bengal and never came back.
        This guy support Khilafat, while in India he was fighting for democracy. What a double standard he had.

        Like

    • MK Gandhi was the first of politician in the Indian Subcontinent to use religion as a tool for achieving political gains. In pre-independence India, Muslims in India viewed Congress Party as a party of Hindus and were generally not attracted to it. To woo Muslims Gandhi in 1923 participated / launched the Khilafat Movement in protest against British occupation in Turkey, supporting Caliphate. Thus started muslim appeasement in India which led to Partition and unending sufferings in the Subcontinent for both Hindus as well as Muslims, also leading to the dangerous spread of terrorism throughout the world.
      Those words of Gandhi should be taken with a pinch of salt…

      Like

    • Jas ,it was Sikhs yes but Never forget Great Marathas led by Shivaji and later Peshwas that were responsible for fighting aginst Muslims and demolishing Muslim rule from India for good!

      Like

    • As like many, I have a bit interest in History—also become so upset to learn the mispresentation, espacially the facts and figures prented there. You will see that Piggot, Wheeler etc have mentioned Massacare by the Aryans in Sind Civilization. Epic Ramayana presents that Rama’s younger brother Varata killed some 30 million people in Kekoya to save his maternal uncles throne. Anyway,world history population reprents the figure ( http://www.worldhistorysite.com/population.html) that India belonged 24% of Population in 400 BC ; reduced to 21% of the total population in 200 AD and again sharp rise was in 800 AD( 29%). The pick was in 1000 AD with 30% . The Muslims ended rulling India leaving 27% of the entire world population here in this land. Despite the removal of widow burning, Narabali , about what Shripantha, writer of book Thagi mentioned that India lost 40,000 human beeing every year in the name of sacrifice to daity Bhawani, india’s population have been deminishing. Now its 21%. India never have touched the population what it had during the Muslim rule. So all the statistics represented their need acid test- Either the statics of massacares, or the world history of population. As a human being I do belive in Humanity more than the issues of religion and religious feudal issues. Awlad Dhaka.

      Like

      • And Awlad Hassain, copy pasting the same comment over and over again does not make your argument stronger. Just makes you sound like a parrot.

        Like

    • Please don’t ever say that to a Marathi person. Maharashtra and much of southern India would have been completely different had it not been for Shivaji Maharaj.

      Like

  27. The I SLAM sycophants at wikipedia will not classify the mussel men attacks upon hindus or buddhists as genocide because they want primary and or secondary sources that apply the term genocide and classify the actions as genocide .

    The term may be a modern term ; however , does anyone have verified , published , sources that specify these attacks as genocide ?

    The moderators at wikipedia are making a distinction between “genocide” and “genocidal” (whatever that means in their facilitating heads) .

    The moderators at wikipedia also remove the quotes from surah 9 of the qurayn that have directed these genocides .

    ——-

    ——-

    9:1 [This is a declaration of] disassociation, from Allah and His Messenger, to those with whom you had made a treaty among the polytheists.
    ..
    9:5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.

    9:28 O you who have believed, indeed the polytheists are unclean, so let them not approach al-Masjid al-Haram after this, their [final] year. And if you fear privation, Allah will enrich you from His bounty if He wills. Indeed, Allah is Knowing and Wise.

    9:29 Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

    9:33 It is He who has sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion, although they who associate others with Allah dislike it.

    9:73 O Prophet, fight against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be harsh upon them. And their refuge is Hell, and wretched is the destination.

    9:111 Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah, so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.

    9:123 O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous.

    ——-

    ——-

    Note that zakah is a tithing for believers ( converts ) , while a jizyah is a subjugation tax – either way , it is directed by the sword .

    Like

    • As like many, I have a bit interest in History—also become so upset to learn the mispresentation, espacially the facts and figures prented there. You will see that Piggot, Wheeler etc have mentioned Massacare by the Aryans in Sind Civilization. Epic Ramayana presents that Rama’s younger brother Varata killed some 30 million people in Kekoya to save his maternal uncles throne. Anyway,world history population reprents the figure ( http://www.worldhistorysite.com/population.html) that India belonged 24% of Population in 400 BC ; reduced to 21% of the total population in 200 AD and again sharp rise was in 800 AD( 29%). The pick was in 1000 AD with 30% . The Muslims ended rulling India leaving 27% of the entire world population here in this land. Despite the removal of widow burning, Narabali , about what Shripantha, writer of book Thagi mentioned that India lost 40,000 human beeing every year in the name of sacrifice to daity Bhawani, india’s population have been deminishing. Now its 21%. India never have touched the population what it had during the Muslim rule. So all the statistics represented their need acid test- Either the statics of massacares, or the world history of population. As a human being I do belive in Humanity more than the issues of religion and religious feudal issues. Awlad Dhaka.

      Like

      • AWLAD HASSAIN have u got anything new to say, just going on posting the same comments “I have a bit of interest…” “I have a bit of interest…” “I have a bit of interest” “I have a bit of interest…” x 10 . No one cares about your interest. Your facts have already been proven wrong by fellow bloggers.

        Like

    • In the 1500’s there were only 500 million people on the entire earth. This article is an apparent exaggeration. Real historians know that the study of history is really the ‘study of the study of history.’ This means that one must first study the history writer, their times, their politics etc. and then do the same for numerous other writers and then study the documents and then consider your own prejudices and experiences and then maybe one might come to a very tiny kernel of truth after many years of study. Very few today have that discipline. We learn most of our history from the Washington Post, New York Times or from CNN.

      Unfortunately many people are dimwitted, lazy and hateful today and cannot see past their own fear and narcissism.

      Like

      • Your numbers don’t add up. In India alone there was more than 500 million people at any time for the past 1000 years or more. So how can the whole world only contain 500 mil? And in Europe over 350 million people died from the plague.

        Like

  28. The Muslims then are different from the ones know only a tiny proton of Muslims are terrorists anyone who wants to kill a race is no better than Hitler. The crusade was this exact same thing. Also the data shows the Hindus wherent even the right DNA type you idiots stop being messed up and realize the world is int all white Catholics

    Like

    • Edward Schwartz , unlike the hindus of india who would commit suicide rather than fight , the europeans eventually defended themselves but it was nearly 300 years after the initial invasion of fictional ishmaelism . The crusades were intended to purge the malevolence of the invaders .

      Liked by 1 person

    • As like many, I have a bit interest in History—also become so upset to learn the mispresentation, espacially the facts and figures prented there. You will see that Piggot, Wheeler etc have mentioned Massacare by the Aryans in Sind Civilization. Epic Ramayana presents that Rama’s younger brother Varata killed some 30 million people in Kekoya to save his maternal uncles throne. Anyway,world history population reprents the figure ( http://www.worldhistorysite.com/population.html) that India belonged 24% of Population in 400 BC ; reduced to 21% of the total population in 200 AD and again sharp rise was in 800 AD( 29%). The pick was in 1000 AD with 30% . The Muslims ended rulling India leaving 27% of the entire world population here in this land. Despite the removal of widow burning, Narabali , about what Shripantha, writer of book Thagi mentioned that India lost 40,000 human beeing every year in the name of sacrifice to daity Bhawani, india’s population have been deminishing. Now its 21%. India never have touched the population what it had during the Muslim rule. So all the statistics represented their need acid test- Either the statics of massacares, or the world history of population. As a human being I do belive in Humanity more than the issues of religion and religious feudal issues. Awlad Dhaka.

      Like

    • Why do you mention the Crusades? The Crusades were NOT the same thing! They were a reaction, albeit a violent one, against the bloody Islamic fanatics sweeping East and West, who seized by force, Christianity’s holiest city. Also, “a tiny proton of Muslims are terrorists”…..complete rubbish! The silent majority are just as guilty by looking the other way, letting them go about their murderous business. The silent majority of Germans were just as guilty as the Nazis in the 1930’s, by looking the other way!

      Like

  29. It looks like India is a good case study for Europe, this is the exact samething which is happening over there.Now EU/german government is banning almost anything anti-islam due to backlash from these savages.
    I say the next stage would be building mosques more pre-dominantly, more sufi type taqqiyya garbage claiming how islam is a religion of peace until they are around 15% of the population.Later intimidation of the good people, looks like this medieval cult needs to be purged.

    Liked by 2 people

    • YES…AGREED HENCE THESE PEOPLE SHOULD BE STOPPED RIGHT NOW
      . WHEN THEY MULITPLY ( AS EACH IS LAMIC WOMAN HAS 10 KIDS) THEY WILL KILL ALL NON-MUSLIMS..THEY WANT TO MAKE EARTH HELL

      Liked by 1 person

    • As like many, I have a bit interest in History—also become so upset to learn the mispresentation, espacially the facts and figures prented there. You will see that Piggot, Wheeler etc have mentioned Massacare by the Aryans in Sind Civilization. Epic Ramayana presents that Rama’s younger brother Varata killed some 30 million people in Kekoya to save his maternal uncles throne. Anyway,world history population reprents the figure ( http://www.worldhistorysite.com/population.html) that India belonged 24% of Population in 400 BC ; reduced to 21% of the total population in 200 AD and again sharp rise was in 800 AD( 29%). The pick was in 1000 AD with 30% . The Muslims ended rulling India leaving 27% of the entire world population here in this land. Despite the removal of widow burning, Narabali , about what Shripantha, writer of book Thagi mentioned that India lost 40,000 human beeing every year in the name of sacrifice to daity Bhawani, india’s population have been deminishing. Now its 21%. India never have touched the population what it had during the Muslim rule. So all the statistics represented their need acid test- Either the statics of massacares, or the world history of population. As a human being I do belive in Humanity more than the issues of religion and religious feudal issues. Awlad Dhaka.

      Like

      • AWLAD HASSIN you do not seem to know anything else. Will you please stop iterating the same set of wrong skewed comments again and again. Your facts have been contradicted. Just take a look at the replies!

        Like

  30. Funny to see people trying to say the article is not valid…..Look at modern ISIS you will get the picture….
    If you want to still doubt the article…..l
    The 1971 Invasion on modern day Bangladesh also say 3 Million Muslims got killed by Muslims from modern day Pakistan army and the MASACARE only stop with the Help of India and renamed it to Bangladesh…..

    Like

    • It’s Muslims (Pakistan) who killed anywhere from 300,000 to 3 mil other Muslims. Got nothing to do with India.
      What are Muslims doing in India in the first place, which was a Hindu country? India never invaded any Islamic country. So why were Muslims there terrorizing the people and demanding land to themselves out of someone else’s country?

      Liked by 2 people

  31. THANK YOU, ADMIN FOR TELLING THE TRUTH WHEN WIKIPEDIA DARES NOT
    The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with utmost glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave-markets, and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by the sword in this period” (historian Durant cited in Khan p 201)
    AND YOU KNOW WHAT:
    EVEN NOW IN 2016 MUSLIM LUST FOR BLOOD CONTINUES SO YOU CAN IMAGINE HOW EVIL THEIR ACTIONS WERE WHEN THERE WERE NO SLICK MODERN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS.
    IT IS TIME FOR THE WORLD TO RECLASSIFY SAUDI ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISM ….. NOT A RELIGION BUT A VILE AND EVIL CULT WHICH SHOULD BE OUTLAWED.

    Liked by 2 people

  32. I don’t want to comment on the accuracy of this article, whether its correct or incorrect. But want to ask a single question – when Hindus were & are in such large numbers, then why they were enslaved? Might be due to the caste system which never allowed Hindus to unite together. This evil continues to this day, with people voting on the basis of their caste only. Ancient Indian Kings are also to be blamed – Agreed India made impressive progress in all fields but neglected military progress which could ensure security to its inhabitants…

    Like

    • Funny to see people trying to say the article is not valid…..Look at modern ISIS you will get the picture….enough said

      Like

    • The article briefly commented on that. It stated something like, they fought but never for killing others, booty, or destroying others temples,farms, and everything of others. Basically this means they only fought for self defense , and the concept of others coming to destroy their existence was never thought of unfortunately. Keep in mind, the Hindus were advanced societies, and very civilized. In such a society, no one could expect such savages to come invade.

      The world needs to see history as its starting to repeat.

      Like

    • After the Kalinga war led by Emperor Ashoka, the Emperor was devastated seeing the enormous bloodshed and sufferings of the people due to the war. He gave up his sword, embraced Buddhism and nonviolence. Buddhism started spreading fast and it covered almost the entire subcontinent and beyond. Though spiritualism, philosophy and other learnings greatly flourished, the rulers and people of the Indian Subcontinent became militarily weak over the centuries. This allowed the Muslim invaders, who were militarily superior, conquer India easily and carry out mass killing/rape/enslavement/loot/plunder/castration/conversion without any resistance.

      Like

  33. if Muslim invader killed 400 local people then why they left remaining they can killed every one and made India Muslim country whereas still at the time of last Muslim ruler Muslim were less under Muslim control area and more other area which were not under Muslim control even Deli Muslim capital city Muslim never exceed over 25% of total population of the city

    Like

    • Since military and other technology was still primitive, the Muslim invaders could not plunder 100% as is being done by ISIS in their territory. Note that after the British ended Muslim rule, the rate of conversion drastically fell. Why large scale conversion happened during Muslim rule, but latter it stopped?

      Like

    • As soon as someone begins to qualify themselves as an authority, I am immediately suspicious.
      Your bigoted anti-west rants gives further grounds.
      Your quoting of a half baked, so-called, refutation which ignores any reasoning behind the case it claims to refute – strawmen rampant – adds confirmation.
      Your attempt to refute this article based on claimed failings of other arguments, provides more confirmation, if needed.
      No attempt to refute any of the details of this article.

      All leads to only one conclusion.
      Your opinions are of absolutely no value.
      They only distract from one truth.
      islam is the most evil doctrine ever to have come out of the mind of man.

      Like

  34. There are unsupported specific claims here which make me doubtful of the wider claims made. For instance:

    1. ” India’s population is said to have been around 600 million at the time of Muslim invasion.”

    Said by who?

    2. “By the mid 1500’s the Hindu population was 200 million.”

    Really? Was there a census or something like it?

    3. “From the time Muslims started arriving, around 632 AD, the history of India becomes a long, monotonous series of murders, massacres, spoliations, and destructions.”

    632 AD is the year Mohammed died. His armies were not out of Arabia by that time. It was another 90 years before they reached India. Why did Alain Danielou make such an obvious mistake and why did themuslimissue not spot it?

    Liked by 1 person

      • I am not denying that there was trade between Mohammed’s Muslims in Medina and India in his lifetime. I believe they were particularly keen on Indian swords (India being pioneers in steel-making) just as today ISIS use weapons from more advanced societies which they cannot make themselves. But unless the traders also carried out murders and massacres then the statement is wrong.

        Like

    • Actually India was geographically all of the current India,Bangladesh,Pakistan,Afghanistan and even more to the west. If you recall, they recently destroyed ancient artifacts, and Hindu temples in Afghanistan. So when you say until another 90 years are you referring to the current India, or the India then? I will tell you one thing for sure, westerners have a habit of negating facts when they have agendas of their own. This article written by a non India actually reveals alot of facts when the so called western experts put a spin on things for their own agendas.

      Truth…

      Like

      • For a moment, Just forget about Islam invade India. There was a buffer state between India and Arabia. It was known as Persia.
        Persia was one of the largest Kingdom in those times. What happened to that ?
        Moreover, suppose if Persian Kingdom fell, what happened to those Parsic People (Fire Worshipers)? Do you find them in Present day Persia?
        Why do they have biggest concentration in India today?
        Doesn’t this indicate that Hindus were a tolerant society and Islam was not…!! Please share your thoughts.

        Like

  35. This history is full of inaccuracies. and some sentences were used here to make the Muslim a wicked as we are seeing today from the main stream media of hate against Muslims. Totally forgetting Muslims contributions towards the development of India

    Liked by 1 person

    • ABU :- What, the hell, are you talking about? Muslim’s contribution towards the development of India?……Utter rubbish! Any developments were the result of Hindus, Sikhs, Parsees, Jains and, yes, even the heavy-handed British. There was and is no Muslim involvement, only killing and terrorism…as it always has been. As for the rest of your post, a tissue of lies, I have to say, along with vast numbers of people, about the “mainstream media of hate against Muslims”, you brought this down on your own heads. How stupid are you to think we non-Muslims should like you? I find that damned insulting that we should accept what happened in New York, Paris, Nice and now Munich. These massacres were committed IN THE NAME OF ISLAM, the “Religion of Peace”!!!

      Like

  36. excellent rendition of History covering the Muslim Invasion and subsequent genocide and complete subjugation of the Hindu population of India. Now, e have a strong govt which believes in the truth to say and spread with solid facts to support. The experience of Hindus in South India was not that horrible compared to North. South India never had a dictatorial Muslim king with jihadi Ideas even though kings like Tippu sultan and Hyderabad Nizam did commit these crimes in other states beyond their borders. let us publicize the ancient Indian history and encourage students to take this for a PhD or attach this some other subject for a masters. let us get rid of nostalgic monuments from areas which are completely under the control of Hindus. We need to build huge massive temples in Ayodhya, Mathura, and Varanasi to make the symbols of Mughal atroctites a onnoxious structure. From these places, We can distribute massive number of book lets, propaganda materials, educational materials so that whole of India is geared up to form a rejuvenated India. Fundtions mimicking Kumb Mela with the participation of all Buddist monks from Asia, Jains, And Sikhs from all over the world can also be made to show that We are the original and we do not subscribe to the dictates of the old testament, new teastament or a last testament. We need to be pro active and do the work quetly

    Like

  37. if Muslim invader killed 400 local people then why they left remaining they can killed every one and made India Muslim country whereas still at the time of last Muslim ruler Muslim were less under Muslim control area and more other area which were not under Muslim control even Deli Muslim capital city Muslim never exceed over 25% of total population of the city

    Like

    • Outof 5000 years histoory of India this 800 years were the worst….its time for us to kill those invader muslims en-mass the Maratha had done…..

      Like

    • n other parts of Asia and Europe, the conquered nations quickly opted for conversion to Islam rather than death. But in India, because of the staunch resistance of the 4000 year old Hindu faith, the Muslim conquests were for the Hindus a pure struggle between life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and their populations massacred. Each successive campaign brought hundreds of thousands of victims and similar numbers were deported as slaves. Every new invader made often literally his hill of Hindu skulls. Thus the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000, was followed by the annihilation of the entire Hindu population there; indeed, the region is still called Hindu Kush, ‘Hindu slaughter’. The Bahmani sultans in central India, made it a rule to kill 100.000 Hindus a year. In 1399, Teimur killed 100.000 Hindus IN A SINGLE DAY, and many more on other occasions. Koenraad Elst quotes Professor K.S. Lal’s “Growth of Muslim population in India”, who writes that according to his calculations, the Hindu population decreased by 😯 MILLION between the year 1000 and 1525. INDEED PROBABLY THE BIGGEST HOLOCAUST IN THE WHOLE WORLD HISTORY. (Negat.34)

      But the “pagans” were far too numerous to kill them all; and Hinduism too well entrenched in her people’s soul, never really gave up, but quietly retreated in the hearts of the pious and was preserved by the Brahmins’ amazing oral powers. Thus, realising that they would never be able to annihilate the entire Indian population and that they could not convert all the people, the Muslims rulers, particularly under the Hanifite law, allowed the pagans to become “zimmis” (protected ones) under 20 humiliating conditions, with the heavy “jizya”, the toleration tax, collected from them.

      Like

    • mohammad areef, now it is your turn to massacre remaining hindus, why lament;
      you will find several potical parties with an agenda to finish whatever hindus remain

      alive the only thing you have todo is to support them by your vote

      Like

    • But people still call Islam the ‘Religion of Faith’.. Islam can never co exist with other religions and is a curse to mankind..

      Like

  38. This article is dumb and lying, Turkish and Mughals are the same people, Afghans never went passed current Pakistan, Arabs lost in Sindh against the Rajputs, and what is a Hindu in genetic terms? He says Hindus vs Turks, 99% of Indians in India are genetically ANI and ASI, the ANI are Central Asians, the ASI are Australoids who are not related to anybody else, the Central Asians are Indo Aryans, Indo Scythians, and Indo Kushans.

    Liked by 1 person

  39. Were too stupid im sure to look not only at the history of this evil ideology, but to islams agenda in the present…if there is a hell, that lying murderous swine mohamed surely resides in it!!

    Liked by 1 person

  40. Reading this obviously gave me a perspective of how Hindus despite being so humongous in population lacked unity, brotherhood, solidarity. Certainly, the current day psuedo-seculars are the eunuchs and not the eunuchs castrated by the Islamists.

    I find Islam is peace to be absurd– it is oxymoron to say so. They are incompatible to each other. The self-proclaimed secular muslims don’t speak up against the historical genocidal practices and nor the contemporary killings. At most they try to do is to attempt to assure us that they are the real muslims and the terrorists don’t have a religion. At least, I can say these people are shamming fearing the out-lash. They are meek as they are not strong in numbers in India. Once they reach a point to contest the democracy to establish Sharia these eunuchs inshallah are the only expendables. Sorry, I was a bit harsh on these psuedo-seculars as I’m upset with the growing sense of bigotry in India media and those who subscribe to their ill ideas. Hinduism failed in one aspect — to check corruption. Also Hinduism has its share of fallacies. Hell, it is not a religion as such and hence no guildelines to follow.

    Although, Hinduism advocates the peace-loving, ethical approach to doing stuff. The corrupted people find no where in scriptures speaking against mal-practices. May be it did but someone being a staunch Hindu doesn’t shun corruption unless it conflicts with his personal notions of leading a moral, better life.

    We have two concerns: global warming and Islam spread. Unfortunately, people downplay the visible effects of the both and live in the state of denial.

    Like

    • This article is lying like crazy, genetic studies has shown that the majority of Indians are ANI(Central Asian Aryan, Scythians, Kushans) and ASI (Australoid mixed, they have no Turkish DNA at all, also Arabs lost like crazy in Sindh against Rajputs and never went pass that.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Lying!!.. Just as your father was fucking your momma while there was actually a gang-rape going on. and you are the stain of it.

        Like

      • In pre islamic era, aryans(who originated in india) spread across middle east with the peaceful sanatana dharma philosophy and became inhabitants over there thats why we have same dna, but after islam they were started considering as pagans or infidels and started converting them, even your afghanistan was predominantly buddhist(branch of hinduism).

        Like

      • Your time has come and gone. No one wants anything to do with the Sunni Buccaneers of His Majesty the Pirate Muhammad. Or whatever title you delusional cutthroats have awarded yourselves.

        Like

    • The real philosophy of the caste system was as follows , and not the current spin westerners like yourself put it.

      Say a child grows up in a carpenter family business. He will be exposed to carpentry and develop skills far greater than someone who takes it up at an adult age. Agree? His caste therefore is carpentry. Likewise a for child of a preist,doctor,iron worker,farmer etc. Got it now?

      Can you feel Hindusm now, and is it starting to make sense why the people were advancing?

      Like

  41. Mediavel times #Hindu massacers and #genocides penned by Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah (born 1560 and died 1620), the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim

    Like

  42. this can partly be blamed on a caste system where only 1/4 of the population and mostly only the males so 1/8th of the population can fight or is encouraged to have the will to fight.

    in general, basic combat training for both sexes and all ages should be a feature of public education.

    Like

    • No.It is not caste system to be blamed.It is due to non violence ideology under influence of Buddha/jain religion.The kings felt combat skills/military not required & made subjects vulnerable to invaders.Hindus are still naive to believe all religions show path of love compassion.History is repeating & wud repeat..Sigh….Modi has betrayed hindus.

      Liked by 1 person

    • You’re partially right but I think the main problem with India was that they were not united. They were split into feuding kingdoms. They would separate each other according to caste and not assimilate, which meant they would not fight together either. So it was easy to attack them with utter brutality. The Hindu religion as well is pacifist and do not encourage violence and barbarity, so the idea was to surrender to your destiny rather than to fight back. It’s the Sikhs who began efforts to try and protect the country. It’s actually Britain that brought all these kingdoms together as one, as India. When the British build the railroad they didn’t create any compartments that separated castes and they had to travel together. The British society did also not encourage any structure that entertained the caste system, sati and other practices that were discriminatory, so they began to learn to function more as one people.

      Liked by 1 person

      • This article is lying mostly, what is a Hindu in genetic terms? They compared Turks to Hindus in this article, this is obviously propaganda against Islam, 99% of Indians in India are genetically ANI and ASI mixed, the ANI are Central Asians like Scythians, Kushans, and Parthians, with the ASI who are Australoids, the majority of Indians have no Turkish genes and Arabs lost against the Rajputs in Sindh.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ” When the British build the railroad they didn’t create any compartments that separated castes and they had to travel together”

        Good for them but, by contrast, British railways have 1st and 2nd class carriages, and I believe there was a time when they had 3rd class as well. When I was young I heard it said that when a train broke down the 1st class passengers stayed where they were, the 2nd class passengers got out and walked and the 3rd class passengers got out and pushed.

        Like

      • I dont mind whatever british did to India…AT LEAST this country isn’t an ISLAMIC STATE ..because of British intervention

        otherwise Islamic devils( rakshakas- who are quiet these days just becuase they are in minority ) would have eaten this country …raped and made this country heaven for the diseases …dirt…poverty…

        tin my whoLE lfife of 50 years..never HEARD A MUSLIM DOCTOR OR ENGINEER IN INDIA..THESE MEN DOTN STUDY AT ALL

        THEY STUDY IN MADRASAS////
        THESE MADRASAS JUST REACH TO HATE AND ENSLAVES NON- MUSLIMS

        WHERE IS ALLAH??
        LETS BAN ALL MUSLIMS AND LETS SEE IF ALLAH COMES FOR THEIR RESCUE….NOTHING WILL HAPPEN AS THERE IS NO ALLAH… NO WHERE
        IN THIS UNIVERSE

        AKBAR THE RAPIST MOHAMMAD THE RAPIST

        GUYS DO U KNOW AK BARS HAREM HAD LESBIANS… ?? AKBAR USED TO NOT LET MUSLIM WOMEN MARRY BTU HAVE KIDS WITHOUT MARRIAGE ..
        HE MARRIED ONLY HINDU WOMEN

        Like

      • If we have one common problem i.e. Islam, than can’t all united together to defeat this evil faith once for all.

        Like

Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s