Muslims WorldWide

Wikileaks: Media is not ‘controlled by Jews’ but by Saudi Arabia: media loyalties purchased around the world


They’ve sure paid a lot to portray “Palestinian” terror state as a victim, and to portray President Assad as a villain.

.

.

Buying Silence: How the Saudi Foreign Ministry controls Arab media (and beyond)

ref: Wikileaks

On Monday, Saudi Arabia celebrated the beheading of its 100th prisoner this year. The story was nowhere to be seen on Arab media despite the story’s circulation on wire services. Even international media was relatively mute about this milestone compared to what it might have been if it had concerned a different country. How does a story like this go unnoticed?

Today’s release of the WikiLeaks “Saudi Cables” from the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs show how it’s done.

The oil-rich Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and its ruling family take a systematic approach to maintaining the country’s positive image on the international stage. Most world governments engage in PR campaigns to fend off criticism and build relations in influential places. Saudi Arabia controls its image by monitoring media and buying loyalties from Australia to Canada and everywhere in between.

Documents reveal the extensive efforts to monitor and co-opt Arab media, making sure to correct any deviations in regional coverage of Saudi Arabia and Saudi-related matters. Saudi Arabia’s strategy for co-opting Arab media takes two forms, corresponding to the “carrot and stick” approach, referred to in the documents as “neutralisation” and “containment”. The approach is customised depending on the market and the media in question.

“Contain” and “Neutralise”

The initial reaction to any negative coverage in the regional media is to “neutralise” it. The term is used frequently in the cables and it pertains to individual journalists and media institutions whose silence and co-operation has been bought. “Neutralised” journalists and media institutions are not expected to praise and defend the Kingdom, only to refrain from publishing news that reflects negatively on the Kingdom, or any criticism of its policies. The “containment” approach is used when a more active propaganda effort is required. Journalists and media institutions relied upon for “containment” are expected not only to sing the Kingdom’s praises, but to lead attacks on any party that dares to air criticisms of the powerful Gulf state.

One of the ways “neutralisation” and “containment” are ensured is by purchasing hundreds or thousands of subscriptions in targeted publications. These publications are then expected to return the favour by becoming an “asset” in the Kingdom’s propaganda strategy. A document listing the subscriptions that needed renewal by 1 January 2010 details a series of contributory sums meant for two dozen publications in Damascus, Abu Dhabi, Beirut, Kuwait, Amman and Nouakchott. The sums range from $500 to 9,750 Kuwaiti Dinars ($33,000). The Kingdom effectively buys reverse “shares” in the media outlets, where the cash “dividends” flow the opposite way, from the shareholder to the media outlet. In return Saudi Arabia gets political “dividends” – an obliging press.

An example of these co-optive practices in action can be seen in an exchange between the Saudi Foreign Ministry and its Embassy in Cairo. On 24 November 2011 Egypt’s Arabic-language broadcast station ONTV hosted the Saudi opposition figure Saad al-Faqih, which prompted the Foreign Ministry to task the embassy with inquiring into the channel. The Ministry asked the embassy to find out how “to co-opt it or else we must consider it standing in the line opposed to the Kingdom’s policies“.

The document reports that the billionaire owner of the station, Naguib Sawiris, did not want to be “opposed to the Kingdom’s policies” and that he scolded the channel director, asking him “never to host al-Faqih again”. He also asked the Ambassador if he’d like to be “a guest on the show”.

The Saudi Cables are rife with similar examples, some detailing the figures and the methods of payment. These range from small but vital sums of around $2000/year to developing country media outlets – a figure the Guinean News Agency “urgently needs” as “it would solve many problems that the agency is facing” – to millions of dollars, as in the case of Lebanese right-wing television station MTV.

Confrontation

The “neutralisation” and “containment” approaches are not the only techniques the Saudi Ministry is willing to employ. In cases where “containment” fails to produce the desired effect, the Kingdom moves on to confrontation. In one example, the Foreign Minister was following a Royal Decree dated 20 January 2010 to remove Iran’s new Arabic-language news network, Al-Alam, from the main Riyadh-based regional communications satellite operator, Arabsat. After the plan failed, Saud Al Faisal sought to “weaken its broadcast signal“.

The documents show concerns within the Saudi administration over the social upheavals of 2011, which became known in the international media as the “Arab Spring”. The cables note with concern that after the fall of Mubarak, coverage of the upheavals in Egyptian media was “being driven by public opinion instead of driving public opinion”. The Ministry resolved “to give financial support to influential media institutions in Tunisia“, the birthplace of the “Arab Spring”.

The cables reveal that the government employs a different approach for its own domestic media. There, a wave of the Royal hand is all that is required to adjust the output of state-controlled media. A complaint from former Lebanese Prime Minister and Saudi citizen Saad Hariri concerning articles critical of him in the Saudi-owned Al-Hayat and Asharq Al-Awsat newspapers prompted a directive to “stop these type of articles” from the Foreign Ministry.

This is a general overview of the Saudi Foreign Ministry’s strategy in dealing with the media. WikiLeaks’ Saudi Cables contain numerous other examples that form an indictment of both the Kingdom and the state of the media globally.

11 thoughts on “Wikileaks: Media is not ‘controlled by Jews’ but by Saudi Arabia: media loyalties purchased around the world

  1. Ridicilious argument. If Muslims did infact have control over the worlds media they may have stood a chance in controlling the worldwide epidemic of Islamophobia. One of the most asked questions about Muslims is why there are no Muslims condemning radical Islamists. However a quick search online reveals the tons of news stories about Muslims and Islamic leaders who have repeatedly condemned acts of terrorism and yet the majority of those events never made it to the world news. The question is who has most to gain from hiding this information. I think the general knowledge about %96 of the worlds media being owned by Jews remains as the firm argument.You only have to look at the way Islam has been portrayed to figure that out. I doubt that the Saudi Muslim businessman would seek enjoyment in repeatedly shooting themselves in the foot. But I’m sure the Jews have no hesitation pulling the trigger for them.

    Like

    • …worldwide epidemic of Islamophobia.

      Your self-induced cascade of endorphins is making some dealer very happy.

      Of course Judaism is the world’s most successful conspiracy. Why, only six thousand years and they already constitute 0.02% of the human population and control one six hundred fortieth [ 1/640th ] of the land in the Middle East.

      With this lightning pace they may be running a third of the planet by the time the Sun goes Nova. [ Suns going Nova is another Zionist plot just waiting for exposure in the tabloids. Like Der Sturmer. ]

      Or, then again, you simply may be just another Jew-baiting moron.

      Like

  2. Makes one think that idea of being dependent on foreign oil, seems a little senseless . . . how about STUPID! I figure it is time to use our own resources and then blow the hell out of theirs. This is the only negotiating they UNDERSTAND!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. $$audis own not just media but also the alternative media: RT, SGTReport, etc.. No doubt Saudis have invested a lot of money to twist Zionism into something monstrous. A lot of Americans, Canadians and Europeans have taken a lot of Saudi money to cry for the Palestinians while the blood line of the Saudi money-takers, is responsible for the EXTERMINATION of the natives of the Americas

    Liked by 1 person

  4. We need an article on how the Saudis have purchased/influenced the US media too. Containment is an operative word, as well as pimp reporters saying Prophet Mohammad” when the guy proclaimed himself a prophet and the perfect man to emulate. He was a narcissist and a psychopath, but the bought out media won’t be objective about any of the lies about the biggest hoax in human history.

    Liked by 1 person

Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s