Muslims WorldWide

Death-sex: The Legitimate Law of Necrophilia in Islam

Obama’s favorite religion gives him the legal right to commit necrophilia should he want to.

Any form of perversion is justified in Islam. As long as it is committed by a male. The duty of a woman is to always be available for all sorts of perversions, whether they want to or not.

Now, what stand would the International Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights take on this ‘freedom of religion’ for Muslims in the West? It’s a complete joke to have these “rights” to a totalitarian political system that breaks and violates every single principle of human rights or humanity.

In April 2012 the Egyptian Parliament tried to pass a Fatwa (legal judgment) that allowed Muslim husbands in Egypt to have  “farewell intercourse” with their wives six hours after they had died.

Islamic necrophilia is traced to the fount of Islam, its prophet Muhammad, as found in a hadith (or tradition) that exists in no less than six of Islam’s classical reference texts (including Kanz al-’Umal by Mutaqi al-Hindi and Al-Hujja fi Biyan al-Mahujja, an authoritative text on Sunni Doctrine, by Abu Qassim al-Asbahani).

According to this hadith, Muhammad took off his shirt and placed it on a dead woman and “lay with her” in her grave. The gravediggers proceeded to hurl dirt atop the corpse and the prophet, exclaiming, “O Prophet, we see you doing a thing you never did with anyone else,” to which Muhammad responded: “I have dressed her in my shirt so that she may be dressed in heavenly robes, and I have laid with her in her grave so that the pressures of the grave [also known as Islam’s “torments of the grave“] may be alleviated from her.”

The hadith that describe and legalize Necrophilia [or see the link to the original source here].

Incidentally, this issue of “death-sex” far precedes Egyptian parliamentarians in 2012. Father Zakaria Botros, explored the perverse sexual habits of Islam’s prophet Muhammad (see here). Interestingly, when that episode first aired, many Muslims were livid, denying the existence of the hadith, and renewing calls to assassinate the priest for trying to “defame” Islam: yet here it is, once again—only this time, the hadith is being passed into a “law,” further documenting the existence, if not legitimacy, of necrophilia in Islam.





Moroccan Cleric Abd Al-Bari Al-Zamzami: Husbands May Have Sex with Dead Wife’s Corpse; Women May Use Carrots as Vibrators

Following are excerpts from an interview with Moroccan cleric Abd Al-Bari Al-Zamzami, a member of the International Union of Muslim Scholars, and from an address delivered by Al-Zamzami. The interview was posted on the Internet on May 11, 2011 and the address on March 24, 2012.

March 24, 2012

Abd Al-Bari Al-Zamzami : A few days ago, I was asked by the Al-Sabbah newspaper about men who have sex with their dead wives. The truth is that this question took me by surprise, and I asked the journalist whether there really are people who do this deplorable and disgraceful act, which is not to be expected from a normal, balanced person. Only a mentally or psychologically unbalanced man would do such a thing.

In any case, I do not have the right to prohibit things. Fatwas are not shaped according to one’s will or whim. Rather, they reflect the law of Allah.


Therefore, I do not have the right to prohibit that act merely because I consider it deplorable.


The evidence I relied upon in this case was that a wife’s death does not sever her relations with her husband. A wife’s death does not sever her marital relations with her husband. She remains his wife post mortem, in the Hereafter, just as she was his wife in her lifetime.


It is perfectly clear that marital relations are not severed by a wife’s death. She remains her husband’s wife. This being the case, the husband has the right to do whatever he wants with her. For instance, he may kiss her. It is common for a husband to kiss his wife after her death, out of love and sorrow. This is something that is done, and there is nothing wrong with it.


The fact that such an act is permissible does not make it commendable or even acceptable. Having sex with your wife’s corpse is permitted but not commendable.


38 thoughts on “Death-sex: The Legitimate Law of Necrophilia in Islam

  1. Pingback: Paper Two – The Truth, Not Denial

  2. Pingback: The Pagan Origins Of Islam - Unveiling The Truth

  3. Pingback: The Pagan Origins Of Islam – UnveilingTheTruth

  4. Pingback: HazMat Team Gives All Clear At Clinton Campaign HQ – Mysterious Powder ID’d As Non-Hazardous |

  5. Brother …you have no idea what is islam…your enmity is not going to harm neither allha nor his messenger…instead of it it is going to show you what is hell.

    Remember in islam go and see the death of a girl or boy who is not in blood relation is prohibited. So is islam…if you create a lie that will b against your own self…Who is your god who will save you from hell??? Satan?

    He is your enemy he has confirmed his place there so calling you…beware of him


  6. The people in Paris draw cartoons of Prophet Muhammad with a head of a dog or a pig, raping his nine year old wife Aisha. Below they write, “This is Prophet Muhammad raping his nine year old wife Aisha as stated in the SahihBukhari hadiths. Any man who rapes a nine year old girl is worse than a dog or a pig. He is an absolute swine.
    This is what we non-Muslims think of your Prophet Muhammad!”.
    The onus now is on the whole Muslim world, especially those Islamic scholars, to tell everyone that they will only follow the good examples of their Prophet Muhammad and absolutely reject and denounce his bad, evil and violent conduct. It’s perfectly acceptable to pray five times daily, do their rituals and to do charity work. However, they must say an absolute NO to religious violence (jihad), child marriage, molesting their child wives, wife beating, polygamy, slavery and to Sharia (Islamic laws). The whole of Sharia is very biazed against women, non-Muslims and non-Islamic religions. It’s totally opposed to our US Constitution and the UN Declaration of Human Rights. Sharia is against freedom of religion, freedom of speech and expression and gender equality.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. We need to look closely at the Founder of a religion to determine on whether its inherently violent or not. We have to look at the Founder’s teachings, morality, his lifestyle and his conduct. We should not look at his followers. We need to carefully examine the religion’s canonical texts.
    Mohammad’s character is the exact opposite of Jesus or the Buddha.

    Jesus and the Buddha did not wage any religious wars. They did not lead armies to murder others.
    They did not have 11 wives, sex slaves and concubines like Prophet Muhammad.
    They did not marry a six year old girl like Prophet Muhammad.
    They did not rape a nine year old girl like Prophet Muhammad (his youngest wife Aisha).
    They did not instruct their followers to murder anyone who criticised them like Muhammad.
    Jesus and Buddha did not instruct their followers to murder anyone who left his religion.
    They did not instruct husbands to beat their wives.
    They did not murder or torture anyone like Muhammad.
    They did not refer to women as camels and donkeys like Prophet Muhammad.
    They did not spread their religion through war/terrorism like Muhammad.
    Jesus and Buddha spread their message through peaceful preaching.
    We judge a religion by its Founder – his life, his teachings, his conduct, his ethics and his morality. We don’t judge a religion by its followers.
    Islamic jihad (holy war or terrorism) derives directly from Prophet Muhammad, its Founder.
    Violence in Christianity e.g. the Crusades and the burning of witches in medieval Europe or the violence in Buddhism like in Sri Lanka and Myanmar recently, come from the followers (Christians and Buddhists). These religious violence do NOT come from Jesus or the Buddha!
    Just where in the Gospels or in the Buddhist sutras do Jesus or Buddha encourage/instruct their followers to kill or harm anyone?
    This is the huge moral and ethical difference between Islam and these other religions.
    Hence, Islam is inherently violent and dangerous. A core tenet of Islam is that Prophet Muhammad is the role model for all Muslims. He is their perfect man.
    Christians and Buddhists do not have to tell everyone that their religions are the religions of peace! Whereas, Muslims always have to tell everyone that Islam is the religion of peace. Islam is based on deception and lies. Muhammad called this taqiyaa.
    The evil self-proclaimed prophet, Muhammad, LIVED and DIED with the medical condition known today as PRIAPISM.

    Simply put, because his penis was erect all the time, it caused him pain, and in order to remove the pain, he had to copulate, and copulate he did, with anyone and with anything, mostly animals.

    Proof of his priapism is the scene on his death bed.

    “Muhammad’s Death Erection

    Abu al-Fida (1273 – 1331 AD) was a Muslim geographer and historian. He relates that Prophet Muhammad suffered from a death erection. Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib, the fourth Rightly-guided Caliph of Islam (and also Muhammad’s son-in-law and cousin) washed his body after his death, and had exclaimed, “O prophet, thy penis is erect unto the sky!”

    Do we know of any other prophet or important man, who started a following, who penis was still living when the rest of him died? He was a sexual pervert with a voracious sexual appetite!

    Muhammad was unique, because his Allah, the same Allah in the Koran, was his nothing more than his own Penis.
    According to the Quran, the Sirarasulah and the Hadiths, Prophet Muhammad was a mass murderer, a rapist, a pedophile, a robber, a liar and a deceiver. He was a terrorist, a warlord and a barbarian.
    Yet, all the various sects of Islam insist that Muhammad is the role model for all Muslims. He’s their Perfect Man and the Perfect Muslim.
    Hence, terrorism comes directly from Prophet Muhammad.


    • In the book of St.Luke. Jesus said.” Bring forth my enemies that do not accept me and I will slay them.” Jesus is the name given to him by the Greeks because they could not pronounce his Aramiac name and he was not the founder of Christianity, it was Paul, Jesus just modified it.


      • to put everything in context, that line comes at the end of a parable and it is not a commandment to kill.

        11 As they heard these things, he proceeded to tell a parable, because he was near to Jerusalem, and because they supposed that the kingdom of God was to appear immediately. 12 He said therefore, “A nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom and then return. 13 Calling ten of his servants, he gave them ten minas, and said to them, ‘Engage in business until I come.’ 14 But his citizens hated him and sent a delegation after him, saying, ‘We do not want this man to reign over us.’

        15 When he returned, having received the kingdom, he ordered these servants to whom he had given the money to be called to him, that he might know what they had gained by doing business. 16 The first came before him, saying, ‘Lord, your mina has made ten minas more.’ 17 And he said to him, ‘Well done, good servant![c] Because you have been faithful in a very little, you shall have authority over ten cities.’ 18 And the second came, saying, ‘Lord, your mina has made five minas.’ 19 And he said to him, ‘And you are to be over five cities.’ 20 Then another came, saying, ‘Lord, here is your mina, which I kept laid away in a handkerchief; 21 for I was afraid of you, because you are a severe man. You take what you did not deposit, and reap what you did not sow.’

        22 He said to him, ‘I will condemn you with your own words, you wicked servant! You knew that I was a severe man, taking what I did not deposit and reaping what I did not sow? 23 Why then did you not put my money in the bank, and at my coming I might have collected it with interest?’ 24 And he said to those who stood by, ‘Take the mina from him, and give it to the one who has the ten minas.’ 25 And they said to him, ‘Lord, he has ten minas!’ 26 ‘I tell you that to everyone who has, more will be given, but from the one who has not, even what he has will be taken away. 27 But as for these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slaughter them before me.’” Luke 19:11-27 ESV


  8. Pingback: Nekrofili och incest på Liberala ungdomsförbundets möten? #asylkaos – Asylkaos

  9. Pingback: In just 600 years: History Note |

  10. There is NO moderate Muslim… You are missing a very important point… The Schutzstaffel in Germany more commonly known as the SS were considered in Germany to be the ‘Radical Germans”. When they garnered power in Germany they only consisted of roughly 10-20% of the German population . Most Germans sympathized with some aspect of their radical approach but by no means were all Germans considered to be radical. After the “Radicals” gained control of the political institutions of the country they took over every aspect of that country covertly or overtly. When they gained control they resorted to intimidation, threats and violence to maintain control.
    This is the point you are missing, when a “Moderate” is threatened to get on board they will always think about their own welfare and suddenly a “moderate” has just become a radical by admission of radicalization or omission of any dissension against the radicalization of the aggressors. Thus in an environment such as Sharia law in Islam would create there is NO moderate Muslim.
    I understand there are nice people in Islam, those “sheeple”, pun intended, are all the more likely to roll over without even voicing one word of opposition due to their weak constitution. This is a proven historical fact and to not acknowledge the threat that exists in any kind of moderate approach to Islam is sheer ignorance.
    In Germany during the holocaust there were no moderates due to this fact. There were only the overt dissenters and the covert dissenters. The overt dissenters disappeared almost as quickly as the Jews were disappearing. The covert dissenters did a lot of good in such a horrific situation, people like Oskar Schindler represented in the movie Schindler’s list… I’m German so i can say that they were a bunch of pansies and idiots just like the “Moderate” Muslims are today.


  11. Uh..okay. So, to whoever actually believed this article, please, take that hadeeth and get it translated for yourself. Give it to anyone literate in the Arabian language and see what they say. This profane so-called translation literally has absolutely nothing to do with the article. In fact, this hadeeth, and I kid you not, is about the Prophet’s river which is known as Nahr Al-Kawthar in Arabic. In this hadeeth, the Prophet (pbuh) is giving his river’s description. That’s it. It’s a beautiful hadeeth where the Prophet speaks of his river not that revolting lie. God, what is wrong with the world? Some people are just downright unbelievable. Peace.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Get a life ! The hadeeth shows the blessed character of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). Please read up on Islam before you TRY to defame th best religion in the world.


    • What makes you think any set of beliefs that cause its believers to act like bloodthirsty hyenas is good?


  13. The quoted Hadeeth speaks of no such profanity. It reveals blessings made available in the spot where our Prophet Mohammed May Peace Be Upon Him, is buried.

    If what you’re claiming were to be true, I would have denounced being a Muslim a long time ago.

    I’ve been a Translator for over 12 years so I should know what the Hadeeth says.

    Stop defaming Islam intentionally. That’s just too low.


    • How do you translate the reward of 72 virgins written in ur Koran as reward to mass murderers of infidels. This is the promise ur demon god allah gives to faithful moooslems who obey his despicable laws in the koran.

      Liked by 1 person

  14. The quoted Hadeeth speaks of no such profanity. It reveals blessings made available in the spot where our Prophet Mohammed May Peace Be Upon Him, wad buried.

    If what you’re claiming were to be true, I would have denounce being a Muslim a long time ago.

    I’ve been a Translator for over 12 years so I should know what the Hadeeth says.

    Stop defaming Islam intentionally. That’s just too low.


  15. Pingback: Mark Steyn: It’s very hard to find experienced suicide bombers… — Winds Of Jihad By SheikYerMami

  16. Islam is profane.
    Only in an worldly cult would the love of the body be privileged over the love of the spirit.
    Muslims do not believe in God, nor in the immortal soul.
    In practice, I would contend that they believe in nothing.


  17. Ahhh muslims, you should be proud of your filthy, islam, najl muhamad and his puppet allah. You truly exceed as the best evolved of humanity, even animals would not engage in such despicable acts. your wickedness surpass the devil himself. Rejoice


    • I for being a muslim can clearly state one thing. This has been taken out of context.
      Islam does not permits this kind of digusting thing.
      And im deeply ashamed of who ever wrote this!
      plese atleast dont disrespect Our Prophet(pbuh)


      • Your so-called prophet is a fake, who has led islam down a perverse and dangerous path. I have no reason to respect your prophet nor the ideology of islam as a whole. Islam follows the so called holy book to the letter. If you don’t follow it completely then you are an infidel.


      • Oh, MOSLEM, please explain these verses from your koran, curse be upon it:
        “Your Lord inspired the angels with the message: ‘I will terrorize the unbelievers. Therefore smite them on their necks and every joint and incapacitate them. Strike off their heads and cut off each of their fingers and toes.” “So wound their bodies and incapacitate them because they oppose Allah and His Apostle.”
        Qur’an 8:59
        “The infidels should not think that they can get away from us. Prepare against them whatever arms and weaponry you can muster so that you may terrorize them.”

        There are many more similar verses, all of which call for the destruction of anyone who is not a moslem.

        I’m an unbeliever so when are you coming for me?


      • “taqiyya”

        Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to “smooth over differences.”

        There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam – in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.

        Liked by 1 person

  18. Oh, come on! Necrophilia? In the future, please indicate the reprints from the Onion, to prevent the gullible from assuming anything as unthinkable as this is real.


Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s