Muslims WorldWide

Our history: Muslims branded white slaves with hot irons – then as well as now

“There is a long history of girls being kidnapped from Europe and ending up in Morocco [and from there to Turkey and Saudi Arabia].”
— Portugese police on child abduction

A Medieval painting showing Muslims branding Caucasian girls captured in sex-slave raids into Christian Europe. Muslims who purchased such girls in Islamic slave markets had them branded with red-hot irons. [h/t Dave via Chris A-W, facebook]

christian slavesThis old painting shows Muslims branding European slave girls with red-hot irons.



American and European historians have studied all aspects of the enslavement of Africans by whites, but have deliberately ignored the slavery of whites by North Africans, during approximately the same period as the transatlantic traffic, and which devastated hundreds of coastal communities. In the thought of today’s nations, slavery is only of blacks, while the Mediterranean slave history is, in fact, more horrible than American slavery. UNESCO behaves with hypocrisy obscuring trafficking in Arabia and Africa, while forgetting the history of abuse of Europeans.

Muslim invasions, theft, mass murders, rape waves, booty raids, slave raids, wars continuing from 620 AD until as late as 1920 AD without interruption, destroyed the entire European Classical and Medieval civilization leaving nothing but a shell.


Why is there so little interest in the slavery that took place in the Mediterranean while the education and reflection on the slavery of blacks never ends? As the slaves of white masters, white slaves do simply not fit “the master narrative of European imperialism”. Patterns of victimization so dear to intellectuals require white wickedness, not white suffering. For centuries, Europeans themselves lived in fear of the whip. With a little effort, it is possible to imagine the Europeans concerned about slavery as much as blacks. If the Europeans had grievances regarding the slaves of the galleys in the same way that blacks have grievances for workers in the fields, European policy would be certainly different. There would be no creeping excuses for the “Crusades”.

Muslims attacked our countries relentlessly on slave and booty raids. From 620 AD onwards reaching all the way into 1920 AD there was not a single year of peace from Muslim aggression. How come our children are not being taught the truth in school? Because oil trade and Arab financing demand that people should be lied about Islam. Therefore, all trade must cease once and for all, completely, with all Muslim nations.

Completely ignored from educational materials is the sixteenth centuries of white slave raids by Muslims that were more numerous than Africans deported to the Americas. Everyone speaks of the black slave but nobody talks about the enslavement of whites by Muslims. In short, the slavery of the European white population by Muslims should also be acknowledged and talk about. If the Europeans had grievances regarding the slaves of the galleys in the same way that blacks carry grievances for workers in the fields, European policy would certainly be different, there would be no excuses made for the Crusades painted them in a distorted light; minarets would not push across Europe, and the Turkey would not dream of joining the European Union.

The current Western mentality mode demonstrate severe amnesia about his unfortunate story of its own people forced into slavery of whites, submitted by hundreds and hundreds of thousands to the ferule (submission) of islam (more a million during the 16th and 17th centuries and subsequently). This Treaty of white surpasses in number the digits of the slave which is estimated at 800,000 people, so there was more annually razzies white slave than Africans deported to the Americas, this trade, they practiced for centuries and it remains today, one of their unfortunate specialties (Mauritania) and elsewhere in some Muslim countries.

Muslims negotiating the price of a European slave captured in slave raids across Europe. Over 6 million Europeans are estimated to have been taken as slaves, although the numbers are likely much higher considering these raids continued for more than 1,000 years. It is due to these raids that Europe has a history of repeated bans on slavery since the 1300’s, that constantly failed.

When the Arabs began to arrive in Vieste (South of the Italy) in 1554, they kidnapped 6,000 whites. The Algerians took 7,000 slaves in the same year in the Bay of Naples. Spain also suffered large-scale attacks. After a raid on Grenada in 1556, which reported 4,000 men, women and children captured into slavery, they were told that it was “raining Christians on Algiers”, and that these raids dropped the price of slaves so much that slave masters could “barter a Christian for an onion”. The appearance of a large fleet could scare an entire population inland, emptying the entire coastal regions. The Muslims did not object to desecrate churches and often ignored the bells, to reduce to silence the distinctive voice of Christianity.

Between 1530 and 1780, there were almost a million and a half of white European Christians enslaved by Muslims of the Barbary Coast. This surpasses the generally accepted figure of 800,000 Africans transported to the colonies in North America and later in the United States. There has been estimates of 3 – 6 million Europeans being taken into slavery. But considering that the slave raids and attacks were relentless for over 1,000 years and not the 250 years from 1530 to 1780, we can presume these numbers are highly understated.

Not only were the white slaves goods, but they were above all infidels, and deserved all the suffering of a master imposed them. Christian slaves were often so abundant and so cheap that he had no interest in their well-being or prolonged health, if at least from an economic perspective, and many owners worked them until premature death and quickly bought replacements.

The Christian West occupied only the third place on the podium of slavery. Twelve million people were deported to the Caribbean and the Americas. But others have done worse on the second step of the podium, there… blacks enslave themselves (Blacks against blacks), which produced at least 200 million captured people sold in Muslim slavery for 14 centuries.

Painting shows a young pre-teen white European male chained and lead with a black slave to the slave market by their Muslim slave captors.



“I would like to come back to my United States family. I really want to see my Dad who I was closest but I have two children by the Prince now, a boy and a girl. I never see him unless I am fertile. I feel close only to my children because I have no way out. I would like to live back in the United States with them but I don’t see that ever happening because the Prince is my master and I am his girl.”

— – A USA child reproductive slave in Saudi Arabia note smuggled out by an Asian area work slave assigned to her.



The Arabian Peninsula inhabitants have long been involved in purchasing slaves. Up until recently, most of these slaves were purchased in Africa. With the advent of oil wealth the Saudi princes have been able to extend their slave purchases throughout the world. This has enabled the Saudi princes to become more selective and specialized in their tastes for slaves.

The Saud family continue to be the prime purchasers on the international slave trade and are known as high end buyers. The Saudi Arabian Government continues to refuse to sign the United Nations treaties on slavery or other human rights issues because they do not want to be subject to their provisions.

They will not sign extradition treaties even with Washington.

They constantly declare they are free of slavery but will not allow international scrutiny. We will deal with the kidnaping of US male and female children by Saudi princes and their associates in this issue. We will substantiate the pattern of abuse using documented occurrence where the princes and their associates have been caught.



It has been an open secret in Washington that the State Department has been extremely sensitive to criticism of its actions regarding Saud Arabia and its princes. There has been an unusual amount of personnel turnover at the Saudi Arabian desk where officials showing the slightest tendency towards ethics and morality are either transferred or terminated to make an example to others.

Why the State Department sensitivity? There are things going on in Saudi Arabia which are so embarrassing to Washington that if the United States citizenry knew, their worst fears about Washington would be corroborated. We will deal with one of these sensitivities in this issue, child abduction by Saudi princes. This is one of several issues we have been reluctant to publish because of the emotional ramifications to families of children who have been abducted around the world in general and the United States in particular.

We had to balance what the Saud princes involved in these abductions would do upon publication. In considering publishing this article against the potential benefits of making known their actions, we chose the latter. The humanitarian action would be for the Saudi Arabian Government to return the sex slaves to their US families so they could receive hospitalization and rehabilitation. We believe this will be considered impractical because of the numbers as well as the legal and political ramifications.

We have seen time and time again US media reported scandals when slaves of Saudi princes and their associates brought into the United States try to escape. The State Department then intervenes on behalf of the Saudi princes with diplomatic or retroactive diplomatic immunity.

We initially became aware of non-parental child abductions by Saudi princes when a US citizen enslaved and tortured by King Fahd’s nephews was told by a guard in their palace prison the last person to inhabit his cell was a “US girl child whore slave”. We soon found the extensive nature of the non-parental abductions of US children by Saudi princes and their procurers.



The Middle East Times reports:

“There’s no capability for reform, no strong character to stop the princes from corruption. You’d need someone to line tens of them up against the wall and shoot them, they’re so used to spending this amount of money.

You couldn’t tell them — you don’t need 20 whores for the night, just one or two. Or you’ve got 20 dwarves in the palace, do you need to get two or three whores for every one? Someone like Prince Bishai Bin Abdel Aziz — that’s one real debauched individual. Try to stop him and he’ll come and kill you.”

The Saudi princes dehumanize child sex slaves obtained through their sex rings by demeaning them and calling them whores so as not to come into conflict with Saudi religious tenets.

“A proud Saudi man wouldn’t defile a Saudi woman, and if a slave or servant or foreign national prostitute is unavailable, he thinks nothing of traveling to Egypt, UAE or Thailand. Sexually transmitted disease is rampant within the country.”

— Former Saudi Arabia resident Mary Doreen exposes the horrific inner workings of sexual slavery in Saudi Arabia during her Talk Show interview tour. She exposes the customs of this most hidden, private and mysterious country: Saudi Arabia.



39 thoughts on “Our history: Muslims branded white slaves with hot irons – then as well as now

  1. Pingback: Our history: Muslims branded white slaves with hot irons – then as well as now – Sheaholliman's Weblog

  2. Pingback: VIDEO: Racist Arabs Trading Black Slaves in Sudan and Mauritania – Dr. Rich Swier


    Muhammad owned several black slaves. Muslim scholar Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya relies heavily on the prophet’s biographies written by great early Islamic scholars. He is regarded by Muslims as an authority, a primary source and a leader amongst Islamic scholars. He tells us in his book, “Zad al-Ma’ad” (part 1, pp. 114-116), the following:

    “These are the names of Muhammad’s male slaves: Yakan Abu Sharh, Aflah, ‘Ubayd, Dhakwan, Tahman, Mirwan, Hunayn, Sanad, Fadala Yamamin, Anjasha al-Hadi, Mad’am, Karkara, Abu Rafi’, Thawban, Ab Kabsha, Salih, Rabah, Yara Nubyan, Fadila, Waqid, Mabur, Abu Waqid, Kasam, Abu’ Ayb, Abu Muwayhiba, Zayd Ibn Haritha, and also a black slave called Mahran.”

    Even today in Saudi Arabia, the heartland of Islam, the common word for “Black” is “Abd”, also meaning “slave”.


    In one instance, a man freed a slave that he kept as a sexual partner. When Mohammed heard what happened, he auctioned the boy and sold him for 800 dirhams to Na-eem Ebn Abdullah Al- Nahham. (Sahih Moslem vol. 7, page 83)

    According to Mohammed, the punishment for committing adultery is different with a free-woman and a slave-woman. The man must be flogged one-hundred stripes and be exiled for one year. The free woman must be stoned to death. But the slave-woman (since she has a monetary value) will not be exiled or killed, she is to be flogged one-hundred stripes. If the violation is repeated, the slave-woman is to be sold. (Sahih Al Bukhari vol. 8:821 & 822)

    There are many teachings in the Koran, in which Allah promotes the sexual and physical brutalization of human beings.

    Quran 2:178:

    “O you who believe! retaliation is prescribed for you in the matter of the slain, the free for the free, and the slave for the slave, and the female for the female, but if any remission is made to any one by his (aggrieved) brother, then prosecution (for the bloodwit) should be made according to usage, and payment should be made to him in a good manner; this is an alleviation from your Lord and a mercy; so whoever exceeds the limit after this he shall have a painful chastisement.”

    Quran 4:3:

    “ Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice”.

    You can have sex with married women and female slaves obtained in war (with whom you may rape or do whatever you like). The divine institution of Islamic slavery, including the sex-slavery, is the vilest of institutions ever created in history.


    Islam is an ideology, whose sacred Scriptures contain explicit denigrating remarks about black people.

    Mohammed referred to Blacks as “raisin heads”. (Sahih al-Bukhari vol. 1, no. 662 and vol. 9, no. 256).

    In another Hadith, Mohammed is quoted as saying that Blacks are, “pug-nosed slaves”. (Sahih Moslem vol. 9, p. 46-47).


    Ibn Hazm says in Vol. 6, Part 9,

    “The slave is not permitted to write a will when he dies, nor can he bequeath (anything) because his entire possessions belong to his master.”


    In Vol. 35, p. 409 Ibn Timiyya remarks,

    “The Shafi’i, Malik, and Abu Hanifa, who are the legists of Islam, assert that the testimony of the slave is not acceptable.”

    The “Ordinances of the Qur’an” by the Shafi’i (part II, p. 142), stipulates that,

    “The witnesses must be from among our freeman, not from our slaves, but from freeman who belong to our religion!”


    1. The Slave cannot choose for himself.

    This was confirmed by all the Muslim scholars on the authority of Muhammad. In Vol. 6, Part 9, p. 467, Ibn Hazm said,

    “If a slave gets married without the permission of his master, his marriage will be invalid and he must be whipped because he has committed adultery. He must be separated from his wife. She is also regarded as an adulteress because Muhammad said, ‘Any slave who gets married without the approval of his master is a prostitute.'”

    The same text is quoted by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (Part 5, p. 117 of “Zad al-Maad”), as well as Ibn Timiyya (Vol. 32, p. 201). Malik Ibn Anas relates (Vol. 2, Part 4) more than that. He says (pp. 199, 201, 206),

    “The slave does not get married without the approval of his master. If he is a slave to two masters, he has to obtain the approval of both men.”

    2. The male slave and the female slave are forced to get married.

    Malik Ibn Anas says explicitly,

    “The master has the right to force his male or female slave to marry without obtaining their approval” (Vol. 2, p. 155).

    “The master does not have the right to force the female slave to wed to an ugly black slave if she is beautiful and agile unless in case of utmost necessity” (refer to Ibn Hazm, Vol. 6, Part 9, p. 469).

    In matters of sex and marriage, Ibn Timiyya states:

    “The one who owns the mother also owns her children. Being the master of the mother makes him the owner of her children whether they were born to a husband or they were illegitimate children. Therefore, the master has the right to have sexual intercourse with the daughters of his maid-slave because they are his property, provided he does not sleep with the mother at the same time” (Vol. 35, p. 54).

    “If an owned slave assaults somebody and damages his property, his crime will be tied to his neck. It will be said to his master, `If you wish, you can pay the fine for the damages done by your slave or deliver him to be sentenced to death.’ His master has to choose one of the two options – either the value of the slave and his price or the damage the slave has caused” (Vol. 32, p. 202, Ibn Timiyya).

    Islam is a morally bankrupt, unethical ideology. Slavery, raping slave girls, owning slaves, murdering kafirs, killing Muslim apostates, selling boys and women as trophies of war, looting and pillaging the property of murdered kafirs, sharing the booty (including slaves) obtained in raids and wars with Allah Himself, the subjugation and beating of women, martyrdom for those who are killed for God’s cause, a depraved Paradise filled with virgins—these are just some samples of utterly unethical and evil teachings of the Koran.

    What will be one’s conclusion about a man found to own slaves in a civilized country, let alone raping slaves? Prophet Muhammad, aided by Allah, created the institution of slavery: he enslaved in large numbers, owned dozens of slaves as the Prophet of Islam; he used the female captives as sex-slaves on top his dozen wives; he traded in slaves.

    Such an evil incarnate is eulogized by world’s 1.4 billion Muslims as the perfect human being, the greatest apostle of God, a man of peace. Tens of millions of Blacks—who were given the worst treatment by Muhammad, who suffered the most devastating treatment at the hands of Muslims—also eulogize this man, calls themselves proud Muslims. There cannot be anything more shameful than this.


    Almost all Blacks living in U.S. today can trace their roots back to a slave ancestor.

    The awful truth is that Arabs ravaged Africa for nearly a millennium engaging in enslavement of Africans on a grand scale before the Europeans began exporting black slaves. In fact, the Arabic word for ‘black’ (“abed”) is also the same word for ‘slave’. This is because the black Africans became synonymous with slaves to Arabs. Over 120 million black Africans were killed by Muslim in one of the greatest holocausts in history. Some 75% of slaves perished on their way to markets thousands of miles. To ensure that black men could not have children Muslims castrated them; many died in this barbaric cruelty. This is the reason there are no Blacks in the Middle East.

    Slavery is a divine institution in Islam, enshrined in the Koran and unchangeable for all time. To admit that slavery is a mistake is to admit the fallibility of the Koran and bring its divine origin into question.


  4. Pingback: Arabisk racisme har også dybe rødder - POV

  5. While the real truth and extent of the arab involvement in enslaving europeans can not be slave known it is an exciting thought for a sissy to imagine that they can be under control of a master who would dress you as an arab girl possibly including castration. then been taken to a slave market and sold to man who enjoys obedient sissy boys for his own pleasure or to hire out as a whore. Imagine taking your burqa off then pulling up your skirts bending over so your knew owner could try you out


    • Sorry about the error in my recent message. The word slave crept in by accident between “be” and “known” Clearly I need a master or mistress to give me a good spanking for that


  6. Pingback: Our history: Muslims branded white slaves with hot irons – then as well as now - Ulta Din

  7. Wow what a stupid research based on paintings………
    Muslims never painted humans and snimal coz it is not allowed in religion but somebody who was for sure non muslim must have painted these and must have immagined at home rather witnessing situation fake research on fake facts.
    So strange people are convinced on such stupid arguments.


  8. I always see the show “Missing,” where they talk about many USA women, children and men who just seem to vanish. I called one day, before I read this information posted at your site and suggested that people were being kidnapped by predators selling them to Saudis and other sex slavers. They, of course, did not want to consider that. I still believe that different groups of people I mentioned above are being stolen from us and that our government, including this and previous presidents are complicit with the perpetrators. We need to clean house. We are no longer the land of the free and the home of the brave. We are overrun with muslims and illegals of every stripe and color.


  9. Why this Heading? “Painting shows a young pre-teen white European male chained and lead with a black slave to the slave market by their Muslim slave captors”. The Wrong Headed Heading is Because you cannot bring yourself to call the white Boy a SLAVE by default ahead of his entry into slavery, nor can you think of the Black Man as King, Man, or Anything Other than a Slave even before he is instituted as such.


  10. Here in Australia, Muslims are always regarded by the left side of politics as victims. If they commit an atrocity, it is all our fault; all their actions no matter how vile is totally justified.
    A Muslim terrorist kills 2 innocent persons in Sydney, but the left’s sympathy is with the Muslim community.
    In the eyes of the left, the real evil is the yellow race; the Chinaman is considered to be evil incarnate. The left vociferously opposed mandatory detention of illegal Muslims immigrants and wants to welcome them with a red carpet, but supported mandatory detention and expulsion of Indochinese and Chinese asylum seekers.


  11. You mentioned that period of slavery in islamic world from 620AD until 1920. This period of time was there islamic state “caliphate” actually your judgement is not fair because you classified the period not for the truth but for your tenet. In fact that time slavery was going to decrease century by century; in contrast in Europe was going to increase year by year! Actually there is slavery in islamic world but individual behaviour not systematically behaviour like 15th century to 19th century when white people forced more than 12 million African people to come to America as slaves!! To be honest each nation has black or poor history, but different between one to one..
    if your object to speak about Saudi Arabia Royal family you have to avoid speak about whole islamic world..


    • You need to take a history class on muzzie pirates, white slavery and how Arabs and African chiefs sold nlacks into slavery. Stop demonstrating that you are as ignorant as you seem to be.


  12. This is not ture bro islam makes all peopl love each other u shoud not talk about islam if do not know and about u picture u draw are kiddn shame on u all people if u want to know about why we live on eirth and what sould we do on our lifes and what happen after deth these qution can islam help u with it i gvie u these sites after that u will know the truth
    And this talk about the women histroy in aslam and before


  13. Pingback: America’s first slave owner was black – Anthony Johnson — A look into US slavery – who were the real slave-masters? — ‘White Slaves’ – ‘black Slaves’ | ETA - Expose Them All

  14. Pingback: Your Questions About Slavery - The Ultimate Hypnosis and Self Hypnosis Resource - DIY Hypnosis

  15. Pingback: Your Questions About Slavery - The Ultimate Hypnosis and Self Hypnosis Resource - DIY Hypnosis

  16. Pingback: The Islamic Disease - Page 15 - Stormfront

  17. Pingback: Our history: Muslims branded white slaves with ...

  18. I’ve seen early 20th century photos of Armenian women slaves, with their Turkish owner’s name tattooed on their foreheads. The Armenian genocide is another of the many Moslem atrocities that have been ‘forgotten’.


Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s