Muslims WorldWide

Obama’s Occidental College Transcripts: Indonesian National, Islamic Religion


Recap: Occidental College transcripts provides concrete evidence to annul Obama presidency.

Posted by Corruption

https://i1.wp.com/www.deflationeconomy.com/images/soetoro2.jpg

Obama became an Indonesian citizen as a child. Obama’s Indonesian school registration transcript states ~
Name: Barry Soetoro – Religion: Islam – Nationality: Indonesian.

The smoking gun evidence that annuls Obama’s presidency is Obama’s college transcripts regarding his application for and receiving of foreign student aid.  Obama’s college transcripts from Occidental College indicates that Obama, under the name Barry Soetoro, received financial aid as a foreign student from Indonesia as an undergraduate at the school.

The transcript from Occidental College shows that Obama (Barry Soetoro) applied for financial aid and was awarded a fellowship (scholarship) for foreign students from the Fulbright Foundation Scholarship program – an international educational exchange program sponsored by the U.S. government.

Grants are available for U.S. citizens to go abroad and for non-U.S. citizens with no U.S. permanent residence to come to the U.S.  To qualify, for the non-US citizen scholarship to study in the U.S., a student applicant must claim and provide proof of foreign citizenship. This document would seem to provide the smoking gun that many of Obama’s detractors have been seeking.  The United States Constitution requires that Presidents (and Vice Presidents) of the United States be natural born citizens of the United States.

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

https://i1.wp.com/www.truthorfiction.com/images/obamacertificate2011.jpg
Barack Hussein Obama. A man with many identities. A “birth certificate” suddenly appeared from Hawaii dated April 25, 2011. However, there is not a single midwife or doctor in all of Hawaii who remembers helping Ann Stanley to bring Hussein into this world. Reports indicate that Ann Stanley returned to Hawaii about three years after Obama’s birth in Kenya and tried to register his birth as a US birth. In those days a birth did not need to be registered right after birth. A parent had to register a child’s birth within three years.

https://i1.wp.com/i613.photobucket.com/albums/tt216/LogicWings/mombasa_copy.jpg

Certified copy of Registration of Birth from Kenya, dated 17th of February 1964 and signed by Deputy Registrar Joshua Sioon Couya. This is a copy of an original that had been signed by Registrar E.F Lavender on 5th of August in 1961.

Obama hasn’t met and doesn’t meet the basic qualifications for the presidency – must be natural born citizen.

Obama has been named in dozens of civil lawsuits alleging he is not eligible to be president, with many filing a criminal complaint alleging the commander-in-chief is a fraud.

The filed indictments disputes Obama’s eligibility to be president under the U.S. Constitution which requires that eligible candidates for the United States presidency be “natural born” citizens.

U.S. soldiers including a general refuse to recognize Obama as their Commander in Chief since he is not a U.S. citizen. The soldiers have challenged Obama’s legitimacy by filing federal lawsuits against Obama.

On such soldier was U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook who was given orders to deploy to Afghanistan. Cook refused to deploy stating that he shouldn’t have to go because Obama is not a U.S. citizen and therefore not legally President and Commander in Chief.  The military revoked the orders with no reason given.  Speculation is that Obama would rather not see this thing go to court before a judge!

“In the 20-page document — filed with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia — the California-based Taitz asks the court to consider granting his client’s request based upon Cook’s belief that Obama is not a natural-born citizen of the United States and is therefore ineligible to serve as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Armed Forces,” the Ledger-Enquirer reported.

Cook “would be acting in violation of international law by engaging in military actions outside the United States under this President’s command. … simultaneously subjecting himself to possible prosecution as a war criminal by the faithful execution of these duties,” Taitz stated.

Obama says he was born in Hawaii in 1961, just two years after it became a state.

There are many lawsuits and claims that Barack Obama was never eligible to be president because he wasn’t born in the United States. And there is credible evidence that suggests he is not legally eligible to serve as President of the United States.


Newspaper print of LA Times – Occidental recalls ‘Barry’ Obama. [Click on image to link to Los Angeles Times article, January 29, 2007]

obama-literary-agentsObama’s Literary Agent’s Edward Acton and Jane Dystel in 1991.

Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 promoting his book 'Journeys in Black and White

Obama’s Literary Agent in 1991 promoting his book ‘Journeys in Black and Whitedescribing Obama as, “born in Kenya, and raised in Indonesia and Hawaii’. How would Miriam Goderich come up with a ‘mistake’ like that unless she was told by Obama himself that he was born in Kenya, which is confirmed by the birth certificate and the school records from Indonesia.

Numerous official government documents records Obama being legally registered as Barry Soetoro. School registries shows the registration of Barack Obama under the name Barry Soetoro. During his Occidental College days he is registered as Barry Soetoro. An entry in the journal of the California assembly in reference to grants given to foreign exchange students (this official government document lists Obama as a foreigner not a US citizen. A US citizen wouldn’t qualify for foreign exchange student funding) states Obama as Barry Soetoro from Indonesia.

The first name of a child is always the same from birth. If throughout his childhood Obama went by the first name of Barry then legally his birth name would have to be Barry. In order to register any child for school an official birth certificate must be presented. To receive a government grant proof of citizenship and birth must also be submitted. All of the evidence is stating that Barack Obama’s legal first name is Barry not Barrack.

A biography of Obama’s Occidental College days states that when Obama was 18-19 he attended school as BARRY SOETORO. And it wasn’t until he met a girl by the name of Regina that Obama started using the name Barack.  Regina was the first to start calling him Barack.  There seems to be no record of Obama legally changing his first name from Barry to Barack.

While being sworn in as an attorney in the State of Illinois, Mr Obama had to provide his personal information under oath. He was asked, if he had any other names, he responded none. In reality, he used the name Barry Soetoro in an entry in the journal of the California assembly in reference to grants given to foreign exchange students. Mr. Soetoro/Obama clearly defrauded the State Bar of Illinois and perjured himself while concealing his identity. Anybody else would’ve been disbarred for this and the matter would’ve been forwarded to the district attorney for prosecution for perjury and fraud, however nothing was done to Mr. Obama. More importantly, why did he conceal his identity?

If Obama didn’t legally have his name changed from Barry to Barack then the birth certificate he passed to Congress is a fake, a forgery.  If his name was registered as Barry Soetoro even though Obama claims his real name is Barack Obama then Obama defrauded the state of California in order to receive college funding.  Obama knowingly presented a false document to the state wherein he claimed to be a foreign student in order to illegally acquire financial aid.

U.S. Code

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47—FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS

§ 1015. Naturalization, citizenship or alien registry

(a) Whoever knowingly makes any false statement under oath, in any case, proceeding, or matter relating to, or under, or by virtue of any law of the United States relating to naturalization, citizenship, or registry of aliens; or

(b) Whoever knowingly, with intent to avoid any duty or liability imposed or required by law, denies that he has been naturalized or admitted to be a citizen, after having been so naturalized or admitted; or

(c) Whoever uses or attempts to use any certificate of arrival, declaration of intention, certificate of naturalization, certificate of citizenship or other documentary evidence of naturalization or of citizenship, or any duplicate or copy thereof, knowing the same to have been procured by fraud or false evidence or without required appearance or hearing of the applicant in court or otherwise unlawfully obtained; or

(d) Whoever knowingly makes any false certificate, acknowledgment or statement concerning the appearance before him or the taking of an oath or affirmation or the signature, attestation or execution by any person with respect to any application, declaration, petition, affidavit, deposition, certificate of naturalization, certificate of citizenship or other paper or writing required or authorized by the laws relating to immigration, naturalization, citizenship, or registry of aliens; or

(e) Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or claim that he is, or at any time has been, a citizen or national of the United States, with the intent to obtain on behalf of himself, or any other person, any Federal or State benefit or service, or to engage unlawfully in employment in the United States; or

(f) Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or claim that he is a citizen of the United States in order to register to vote or to vote in any Federal, State, or local election (including an initiative, recall, or referendum)—

This evidence is sufficient to annul the presidency of Obama.   Official Occidental College transcripts registered with the state declares that Obama is an impostor.

133 thoughts on “Obama’s Occidental College Transcripts: Indonesian National, Islamic Religion

  1. Pingback: Tuesday, December 29, 2015 CIA Sanction Disclosure of Time Travel & Mars Bases in 2016 Presidential Bid | saintandrewstwinflame

  2. Lol to the shagrin of our founding fathers, this Indo-Kenyan Muslim is a better leader than the last 3 white, American-born Republicans put together! Keep chasing your conspiracies while the adults improve the nation.

    Like

    • Collapse of the Middle East, Nukes and Billions to Iran, 50% unemployment rate for blacks, 93 million out of the job market, ACA (Obamacare) destroying healthcare, de-balling of our Military, millions of Muslims illegally ‘imported’ to intentionally foment a civil war (see 8 USC 1424), total incapacitation of ICE, loss of border control . . . Alan Keyes was right, that Obama is a socialist, a Marxist intent on destroying the United States.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Meanwhile, you should keep chasing an education. Learn to spell ‘chagrin’. I have my doubts that you can even name the last three Republican presidents.

      Like

      • Our congress is ignorant and refuses to follow Immigration and Nationality Law they began investigating in SR511 over John McCain’s Article II eligibility. The movement is gaining momentum, accepting legal scholars who know that Wong Kim Ark (1898) was a terribly flawed and unconstitutional SCOTUS holding, and that since 1790 a natural born citizen required a U.S. citizen father, period. That court case and common misconceptions of citizenship at birth cannot ‘revise’ Article II of the constitution. Statutes do not create constitutional amendments!

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Uhhh….this is a 6 year old April fools day joke that was created in 2009 to mess with birthers. Why is it being dug up and drug around the internet again?

    Like

    • This is true on it face, and his social security number is worse…it is stolen from his grandmother friend that lived in Connecticut, and born 40 years before Obama…He Obama uses this man ssi, and that is another fraud…the big question is WHO IS BEHIND ALL THIS?

      Like

  4. what difference does it make now, other than attempting to remove him from office before doing more damage. we have more proof of him breaking the constitution than this birth business, and yet every sits around on their hands not doing a damn thing. bunch of cowards in washington.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. When things are settled and it is found out that Obama is a foreigner and has pulled this off with the help of any others. They all should be hanged by the neck until dead. Every co-conspirator that knew anything at all should swing right along side that bastard!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. The fact is that the long form birth certificate that was provided by the president himself was a forgery. This is a fact. It was dissected immediately. The fact that his social security number was stolen. His selective service number was also stolen. He is the epitome of a manchurian candidate, held up by the powers that be that stopped all further investigations. And in the time allowed has totally dismantled and destroyed America. He has worked, I mean his handlers have worked, tirelessly to implement world government. It’s treason it’s tyranny. Nothing short. He should hang with a few thousand others who have paved the way for this treason.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. I am a conservative Christian minister, certainly not a fan of this president or his assault on many priorities I hold dear. I am also a veteran, and father of a son born to his mother and I in Portugal. I’ve researched this thoroughly. It is uncontested that Mr. Obama’s mother was a citizen. That means he would be a citizen (1) of the US if born in HI, or (2) a natural born dual citizen of Kenya and the US if born in Kenya. Had he turned in either passport and renounced his citizenship, the State Dept would then consider him a citizen of the country whose passport he kept. Not a fan, but he is birth-eligible.

    This is not to say there isn’t plenty of grounds to impeach him, should the House pass the articles and get it through the Senate. A Hail Mary quick fix is unrealistic. Republicans should realize that getting their way requires the vision to play the long ball. Holding a legislative majority at all costs and winning the presidency gets them power to do big things. They have to get a candidate that can rally the base AND win the general gets them their in Jan 2017.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sorry. A natural born citizen is born of U.S. citizen parents, regardless of place of birth. That was the law since 1790. If naturalization law is required to remove alienage from a dual nationality birth, that child is a ‘citizen at birth by statute,’ not ‘natural born.’ Many judges and congressmen fail to make that distinction, except the judge in Happersett vs Minor.
      Obama was British at birth. There is no proof of Obama’s place of birth, the ‘short form’ only an unwitnessed declaration by a mother who produces a live infant to the Health Department clerk. The April 26 ‘long form’ was fabricated in Adobe Illustrator, published to kill sales of a Jerome Corsi expose.’
      Nevertheless, the mere fact Obama’s father was an alien kyboshes any claim to Article II eligibility. Obama lost his legal claim to British/Kenyan citizenship after one year of abandonment by the father who failed to register the birth with a British Secretary of State. A ‘legal parent’ under 8 USC 1101 has to be determined for passport and residency purposes. That abandonment of Obama, Sr. made Dunham the ‘legal parent,’ which established Obama as a U.S. citizen at birth. Obama lost his citizenship as a minor, but as a minor had a right to reestablish his U.S. citizenship as he reached the age of majority, which under U.S. law requires a continuous 5-year residency between ages 14 and 21.
      It is a complicated tale, but logical and the law is clear. ‘Legal’ opinions by lower court judges and congressmen unschooled in Nationality Law are worthless.

      Liked by 2 people

      • I’ll agree to disagree, and I’ll defer to the judges and congressmen who have been through law-school and work at crafting and enforcing US law. Were there a legal leg to stand on, action would already have been taken.

        Like

      • I worked in graphic design in the past, and when I heard that the long form birth certificate had magically appeared one day on the White House website, I went there downloaded it onto my computer. I opened it in Adobe Illustrator and was shocked to see the multiple layers of other certificate, whose letters and numbers had been carefully arranged to spell Obama’s name and his vital statistics.

        The stupid thing is that hoever created it (from many other similar certificates, “cut” and “pasted” in dozens of itty bitty pieces) was not even careful enough to “flatten” the layers so that it would be harder to confirm how the document was created. Such a sham. I don’t know his citizen status but I know because I have seen with my own two eyes, that the birth certificate was a complete forgery. Plain and simple.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Actually, you are factually wrong. The laws that govern who IS a foreign born, NATURAL citizen have to do with his mother’s physical presence in the USA. She had to be a US citizen who resided in the USA for a min number of years AFTER the age of 15, and SHE failed this requirement to be able to pass Natural Born Citizenship to her son.
      How do I know this?
      Well, I have looked up the Laws and the dates of the laws. My son who was a naturally born citizen, just had his first child and that child is NOT an American citizen (He tried to register her as an American born abroad) due to HIS situation being the same as obama’s mother’s, not meeting that requirement.

      Like

      • I suspect that there is much more to your son’s situation than can be sufficiently explored in a blog response. I don’t know whether or not you are an attorney specializing in immigration and nationalization, but I would defer to someone with that training and background.

        Like

        • I am a paralegal who specialized in Aliens and Nationality, i.e. Naturalization Law. My research was pretty much Chapter 5 of Aaron Klein’s book on Obama, and was used extensively for Dr. Jerome Corsi’s ‘Where’s the Birth Certificate?’
          Military births overseas have a special set of statutes, primarily written after Viet Nam. Panama was a major territory for children born to military. SR511 was about John McCain’s birth in Panama.
          The only court having jurisdiction over the definition of natural born citizen was the Minor vs Happersett case in which the judge declared that a natural born citizen was born of U.S. citizen parents. He added that any other birth situation came under specific statutes not the issue he was concerned with. Note that a natural condition of citizenship, from the father by blood, is natural law . . . Laws of Nature . . . and the courts have no jurisdiction over natural law. Natural Born Citizen is what it is by nature, not by a court holding.
          The mother’s nationality did not come into play until the Cable Act of 1922. Prior to that, a woman automatically took on the nationality of the husband.
          If you look up my WordPress blog, I have 10’s of thousands of words written, plus extensive citations of law.

          Liked by 1 person

          • I don’t doubt you have some passion for the topic. Still, I find it hard to believe that, in light of the veracity of Bush vs Gore, that the best of the best haven’t already fast-tracked this all the way to the Supreme Court. Bush vs Gore taught us that the parties would unleash armies of attorneys and unlimited budgets if there was a chance at contesting the election. With all due respect, you present some interesting observations, but “Ted Olson quality” attorneys have passed on this one.

            Like

            • The ‘Ted Olson’ attorneys only ‘mailed it in’ as loosely-based opinions, not a true legal analysis. Their reliance on lower court opinions not exactly on point was tantamount to hearsay. Congressmen, all somewhat failed attorneys, kowtow to the worst judges . . . mostly semi-retired lawyers and the product of modern law schools. And then there is the modern debate over Natural Law. The Humanist law schools reject the superior definition, that accepted by our framers when they wrote, “Laws of Nature and Nature’s God . . . ” When I cited jurisprudence denying courts jurisdiction over natural law when interviewed by WND it went over many modern-educated attorneys’ heads.
              Finally, my analysis has very little opinion. It is 95% law, history, and quotable sources. I connect the dots and offer a conclusion, but it provides you the basis to come to your own conclusion . . . the resources all in one place.
              No attorney has refuted my legal analysis, or impeached any citation or conclusion.
              The best definition I have found on Natural Law, and I am not a Catholic but a Diest in the old Protestant sense (very few know what the ‘deism’ term actually meant back then), is found in the Catholic Encyclopedia. Counterpoints were written at Harvard, even by a newly-minted Supreme Court justice revealing her activism/humanism philosophy. Kagan . . . a humanist and progressive, i.e., a Totalitarian Socialist. Fascist.

              Like

              • No offense intended, but I’ve never heard of an attorney issuing an opinion to refute a paralegal. Would a doctor write a refutation of a nurse’s published medical opinion? If your state is like mine, a law license requires a bachelor’s degree, plus a 93-graduate-hour professional Law Degree, plus passage of the state bar exam. Only then are you legally qualified to issue authoritative legal opinions.

                Like nurses, paralegals can begin working after completing a 2-year associate degree. Also like nurses, paralegals often have significant experience and do a lot of work under the supervision of a professionally degreed licensee. Still, neither has the authority to issue a professional opinion. To do so could be considered practicing without a license. May we know your credentials?

                Like

              • There are many kinds of paralegals/legal assistants. From the eye candy at the front desk to one’s you find doing research in the law library or handling files and notes at the bar during litigation. The definition of ‘paralegal’ is ‘doing the substantive work of an attorney, but not licensed to represent a client or give legal advice.’ I have no credentials except rigorous training, by attorneys. While I have litigated up to the Federal District Court, my strength has always been on the research end. So, you see, if an attorney doesn’t know the answer off the top of their head, they either do the research or assign the job to a paralegal. Without good paralegals, attorneys are often flawed and biased in their opinions. Here is an example: In the Heritage Guide to the Constitution, the section on Article II Eligibility, i.e., Natural Born Citizenship, was written by a James C. Ho. Ho was an interesting choice, however flawed. He was born a citizen of China and did not naturalize, but gained U.S. citizenship by marriage. His Heritage Foundation article was brief and virtually without citations except suggestions back to his own writings, and the Wong Kim Ark case (1898) and the Perkins case. Now, more and more people are realizing that Chief Justice Fuller’s dissent was correct, and the decision written by Grey was terribly flawed. In fact, the immigration fiasco we are experiencing right now, which is virtually an invasion at the expense of the legal immigration process, is the direct result of the Wong Kim Ark holding. Now, if Ho had just relied on the Perkins case, no problem. Perkins v Elg was cut and dry and followed the law; and it does contribute one vital analysis of the Natural Born Citizen question. Wong Kim Ark, however, dismissed existing law and unconstitutionally created new law out of misinterpretations and liberal inaccuracies, plus relying on foreign common law from the 1600s.
                Now, you don’t have to take my word for it. I just present the research. Read the Fuller dissent and you will be well-educated. And, my blogged legal memorandums are, as I said, 90% law and history.
                So, your attempt at an ad hominum attack is useless. The law and history and better attorneys and judges as I cited on the subject are my voice. I am merely the messenger.
                What is my conclusion? Congress has the power to overturn the Wong Kim Ark case merely by adding a line of legislative history to 8 USC 1401. That was my suggestion back in February of 2009, and only now are constitutional scholars and attorneys using the same analysis, not relying on political movements but actual history and law.

                Like

              • Please don’t take my response as ad hominem. I have great respect for paralegals and the vital service they provide. I’m not inclined to push, but the question about why, in light of the veracity that history has proven the parties are willing to go to (see Bush vs Gore), has there not been a credible legal challenge from the birth qualification angle?

                Like

              • Okay, why Gore v Bush and not People vs Obama. I communicated and contributed to Phil Berg in 2008 and Orly Taitz. There were a couple other really good attorneys, Mario Apuzzo was one of the best. The Florida case was Democrat driven in desperation for the presidency. They violated Florida and constitutional law to ignore certification of the vote by demanding endless recounts. Obama’s eligibility case was difficult first on the issue of standing. Secondly, those cases that did make it to the docket suddenly expired, the judge backing off. It appeared time and time again that someone got to the judges politically and/or personally. Another reason is Republicans have terrible attorneys (Ted Olson no exception). The Same-Sex Marriage case fooled the conservatives drawing them into the 14th Amendment straw-man argument when it was a question of constitutional Obligation of Contracts and Natural Law. Again, the ‘progressives’ have been running a full front assault on Natural Law and, indeed, as I warned a senator in 2005, would criminalize some aspects of Christianity. You see, modern courts will not accept the simple ‘natural law’ citizenship issue because they want to exercise political power free of natural or religious constraints. You claim to be religious. Did you realize that the original intent and meaning of the ‘Wall of Separation’ was that the Bible was the Wall separating a just society, a paradisiacal Garden, from the World of Savage Heathens outside the Gate? Look how Hugo Black abused the turn of a phrase in order to tear down that Wall we once had.

                Liked by 1 person

              • We would agree on bad conservative lawyering on the newly-minted extra-constitutional rights fabricated on SCOTUS’ “gay marriage” decision. The dangerous disregard for obvious natural law is all part of the progressive transformation of the US into a new world order… We probably agree there, too.

                As for religious, not at all. I’m a Christ-follower, and He is absolutely no fan or religion. And thanks for answering my question.

                Like

              • There is a distinction between ‘religious’ and ‘religion.’ Thomas Jefferson warned that only an educated citizenry could maintain and protect its freedoms. Unfortunately our nation, even its leaders and intellects, are suffering mass cognitive dissonance. The Communist Manifesto inserted itself into our salons and courtrooms as far back as the 1800s. James Ho, himself, may be a communist plant. Ayesha Kahn lead the attack unseating the Alabama ’10 Commandments’ Judge Moore, she a Muslim activist working through the Southern Poverty Law Center. Alan Keyes was dead on about Obama, a communist intent on destroying the United States. Henry George was admired by Sun Yat Sen. Georgism invented the property tax. Even those with good hearts lack access to accurate information . . . and you are welcome to read my blogs which are in wordpress. I particularly like the one on CO2. The one on gay marriage was a resource for a law school course. The light grows, not in a blinding flash but like the dawn. However, even the dawning light can be obscured by the storm.

                Liked by 1 person

              • The history portion of seminary was a real eye-opener for me, particularly the 19th Century convergence of post-enlightenment liberalism and its entanglement with our mailable, fledgling representative republic. We’ve been trying to doctor our way out of that poison pill for about 130 years or so. Every time we think we might control the secular humanist infection it morphs an explodes out of another metastasized corner of our nation.

                To borrow from Dick the Butcher of Henry VI, “First, kill all the liberal professors”… Maybe the liberal reporters, too, figuratively of course.

                Like

      • Nope. I am a paralegal and dissected the statutes making Obama a ‘citizen at birth.’

        Natural Born is devoid of statutory definition or any alienage. Natural-ized can include ‘citizen at birth’ when statute is required to remove one alien nationality. Dual nationality is a conflict of law created in the 20th Century, and now exists formally but only through treaty.

        Like

    • if he is a legal citizen why the deception? why hide his past? how for example did he get into pakistan when travail to that country was not allowed for americans? what about his name barry soetoro?

      Like

      • To my mind, the birther angle is a lost cause. If power in Washington for conservative constitutionalists is the war, the cause needs to pick a good general who can actually win. Keeping control of the legislature is also critical. Then we can do real governing with legitimate teeth to it, and erase all of the illegal executive orders.

        Like

  8. This is absolute rubbish. I suggest people channel their energy in a positive direction instead of witch hunting. Barack Obama is a Christian, highly intelligent, intellectual and accomplished and of high moral integrity which is much more than be said by most of the people who make these asinine comments.
    He has worked very hard to get where he is today.

    Like

  9. Ok, so now what. Evidence has been in place since Hitlerly stated at the debates of ’08. Nothing has been done. Don’t tell us, show us!

    Like

  10. How come this comes out now.What was McCain and Mitt Romney doing when they were running against him.Sheriff Joe,who I admire and respect ,used his detectives and did not get this.This is the biggest fraud in U.S. history and who is going to do anything about it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Nobody. Nobody has the gumption to take it on. Supreme Court justices don’t want to lose their appointments. Those who were appointed by the liar and fraud.

      Liked by 1 person

      • According to the Constitution (which you should read sometime) he has no authority to remove any justice from the SCOTUS. They are appointed for life.

        Like

      • A certificate of Live Birth should not be thought of as a birth certificate. Also it shows his father as African, in American states in 1961 blacks were referred to as Nero or Colored on legal documents. And if you check on the hospital on the certificate, it did not carry that name in 1961. All point to a fraudulent document.
        SO, WHY CAN EVERYONE PRODUCE THESE DOCUMENTS, BUT NOBODY WILL TAKE THE STEPS TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT HIM. ALSO THE VOTING BY DEAD PEOPLE, AND RECORDS SHOWING MORE PEOPLE REGISTERED TO VOTE THAN THERE ARE REGISTERED IN THE PRECINCT. THIS NEEDS TO BE STOPPED BEFORE WE GO TO THE POLLS. BUT WHO’S GOING TO DO IT? I bet TRUMP WILL KNOW WHAT TO DO.

        Liked by 1 person

      • I was asked to forward my research on Obama’s birth certificate and applicable Nationality law to Sheriff Joe’s office, via his detective Mike Zullo. Mr. Trump got his information on Obama’s citizenship and Article II eligibility from Mike Zullo.
        As for ‘impeaching’ Supreme Court justices, attorney/radio pundit Mark Levin is a good expert to consult. While I don’t think you can impeach a justice, congress has the power to overturn what they believe to be an incorrect interpretation of law they have jurisdiction over, e.g., immigration and naturalization laws.
        In my opinion, Wong Kim Ark (1898) was in terrible error and can be repealed by congress through a minor revision and edit to 8 USC 1401.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Obama has been a fraud since day one–he should be tried for war crimes–HE IS AND WAS NEVER QUALIFIED AS PRESIDENT AND FURTHER AS COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF–HAS DONE NOTHING BUT RAISE HAVOC WITH ALL OF HIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL EXECUTIVE ACTIONS HE HAS TAKEN WITHOUT CONGRESSIONAL ACTION–GET THIS CRIMINAL OUT OF OUR GOVERNMENTAL SYSTEM

      Like

  11. : 📞Last person IWhat mood I'm in now: Now I tagged 15 people that I nominated. I'll post a copy in the comments says:

    He never fooled Mr Trump what would he do with this?

    Like

  12. Obama should be REMOVED from office by FORCE and HANGED on the WH front lawn for MASS FRAUD, HIGH TREASON and MURDER!!

    Call, Fax or email The Sargent At Arms and DEMAND he do his job and REMOVED Obama by force, YOU CAN NOT IMPEACH OBAMA, He is NOT an American citizen and IF you impeach it will LEGITIMIZE his presidency, The Obama presidency must be eradicated! Contact information for the Office of the Sergeant at Arms: DON’T JUST LIKE THE COMMENT, GET OFF YOUR ASS AND MAKE THE CALL, I HAVE SEVERAL TIME AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO TILL THE MUSLIM POS IS OUT OF OFFICE!!!!!!!
    Room H-124 US Capitol
    202-225-2456
    202-225-3233 (fax)
    saamail@mail.house.gov

    Like

    • If obama is impeached that would mean that he is the president–my understanding is that he would have to forcibly have to be removed, in order to get all the unconstitutional crap he has created rescinded

      Like

  13. Once again, someone is looking like a fool. Obama has plenty of issues…and we all know he’s a liar and manipulator. However, his mother was a citizen of the US, therefore, it doesn’t matter If she moved to Mars and gave birth, he would still be a US citizen through her.
    Lets look at real issues, you are using this as a distraction.

    Liked by 1 person

      • not true. An ARTICLE II “natural born Citizen’ must be born of a U.S. Citizen Father. The newborn follows the ligeance of its Father where the father is known , acknowledged and legally admitted. The Founders avoided language i.e. requirements such as “must be born on U.S. Soil or born to Citizen parents etc for a reason YES THIS WILL BE THE CASE FOR THE OVERWHELLMING MAJORITY BUT THERE WILL BE CASES

        Like

      • No, from as far back as 1790 a ‘natural born’ (versus by means of statute) required a U.S. citizen father (mother’s nationality was that of husband until 1922). It didn’t matter if the child was born in the U.S. or ‘across the seas,’ just that the parents were U.S. citizens.

        Like

    • The family gave up citizenship in US to become citizens in another country for his enrollment in that school. He was never born in America and was never a US citizen.

      Liked by 1 person

    • But none of that matters if he voluntarily surrendered his American citizenship. According to his own book, Obama traveled to Pakistan in the early 1980’s. During that time, the nation was under the rule of a military junta that neither the US or any other western nation would recognize as a legitimate gov’t. In retaliation the junta banned entry into Pakistan to anyone holding a US or European passport, so what passport did he use to get into and stay in Pakistan?

      And FYI, applying for or receiving a passport from another nation requires surrendering their American passport and with it, their citizenship.

      Like

    • Citizenship would have been given up when he accepted the Indonesian pass port…. No dual citizenship with Indonesia…. Accepting aid as foreign exchange student proves he is no longer ( if ever) a USA citizenship. Fraud waste and abuse

      Like

    • impeach him and charge him with treason. Throw him out of the United States Of America!!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 IN GOD WE AMERICANS TRUST.It does matter. My Father was in the Air Force & My Mother was a United States Citizen. My brother was born in Japan. Was not a U.S.Citizen. (Look up the laws.)My brother later became a Citizen of the United States. And, joined The Air Force. Fought in many wars And Flew fighter planes.

      Like

    • I don’t recall anyone saying Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton were not eligible to be president. Furthermore, the morons at Snopes are nothing more than an old liberal couple who support Obama and got the name of his hospital wrong before scrubbing their website. You’ll need to come up with a better source.

      Like

    • As always with you uneducated pieces of shit
      you pull the race card. It’s funny. Not a swinging cock in my whole Regiment voted for him in 08. White,black,arib,Muslim etc. Go get an education moron

      Like

  14. i like how the ignorant defend this negro without reading any of the documents especially the “birth certificate”……. race of mother? caucasian. race of father?….. african.. when did AFRICAN become a “race”? white people are also born in africa.
    what is the race of those people? gee it must be nice to be stupid.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Pingback: Obama’s Occidental College Transcripts: Indonesian National, Islamic Religion | My Blog

    • Well, obviously, the Republicans in congress are in league with the commuNAZI Marxislamist. They fear being labeled as racist, and accused of starting nationwide riots which result in the deaths of thousands. Disallowing Barry Soetoro the presidency at this point, would show they were duplicitous. Courts have been ruling against Taitz for over 5 years, even tho’ she presents credible evidence. Sheriff Arpaio’s posse has shown that the B.C. on the presidential website is a definite fraud with the likelihood of its being credible in the 23 trillion to 1 likelihood. So, yes, the congress is complicit. They are playing the game that the DemocRATs have set for them. We are about to see the Republicans doing the same with either of two senators, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio, perhaps even a third in Bobby Jindal, none of the three being NBC’s. Barry & the Dems set the stage for wholesale destruction of our constitution, and the rule of law. Shame on them, and/or their supporters.

      Liked by 3 people

    • They do noting because of being a bunch of decripit old men who couldn’t find their way to work every day without a ball of string. And people wonder why this country is all screwed up? Right after Obama is drop kicked out of office, Congress should also be fired, have their pants dropped and be whipped in public.

      Liked by 2 people

  16. Pingback: Obama’s Occidental College Transcripts: Indonesian National, Islamic Religion | Charlenecleoeiben54123's Blog

  17. This is pretty lame. The Occidental College transcript appears to be written in the Indonesian language. I can’t imagine why OC would send a partially hand scribbled transcript to Columbia University on a form printed in a foreign language.
    The birth certificate shown is printed ‘Republic of Kenya’. From 1920 to 1963, Kenya was know as Kenya Colony. When it achieved independence in 1963, the country’s name was the Dominion of Kenya briefly, then changed to the Republic of Kenya in early 1964. This form would not have been used three years prior to the name being Republic of Kenya.

    Liked by 1 person

    • If the form, Barry Soetoro, aka Barack Hussein (insane?) Obama II, used, it would have been used in 1978, or therabouts. So, it could be the form. I’m just not sure Barry speaks an African language, save for ebonics, and in essence, that a halfri-merican language.

      Liked by 1 person

    • So you contradict yourself to prove a point that your own argument can’t prove. if you’re able to see that the document is from the ‘Republic of Kenya’ you are also able to read that the document was signed and dated February 17, 1964 as the certified copy of the registrar. Either they asked for a copy, or there was an extended time frame that did not require an immediate registration of the birth. In Hawaii the window between the birth and time to register the newborn was as long as three years in the sixties. Barack Hussein’s birth, just as his grandmother and other family members have insisted from day one, was recorded to be born in Kenya at the registrar’s office in book 448 page 6733.

      Liked by 1 person

  18. Pingback: The AXIS of GREED » It’s Time to Impeach our Phony President!

  19. Pingback: Barry Soetoro’s Classmates Speak Out | Current Opinions of News

  20. Pingback: Obama’s Occidental College Transcripts: Indonesian National, Islamic Religion | The Central KY Patriot

  21. Pingback: Obama’s Occidental College Transcripts: Indonesian National, Islamic Religion | The Central KY Patriot

  22. Occidental has never released Obama’s transcripts, and it has never said that Obama was registered as a foreign student. The Indonesian Embassy in Washington (which you can call to check) says that Obama was never an Indonesian citizen.

    Like

  23. Pingback: Idiots! | Current Opinions of News

  24. Pingback: It’s Such A Mess! Worse Than Watergate! | Current Opinions of News

  25. Pingback: Obama’s Occidental College Transcripts: Indonesian National, Islamic Religion | Freedom OF religion and Freedom FROM Islam

  26. Pingback: Who was right? The Congressional Stenographer or the 87 Turncoat Republicans? | The Central KY Patriot

    • Because the electoral college gave up its senses, decided it didn’t need to determine validity of the person elected. I honestly doubt any electoral college people actually vote, but instead, the electoral votes of each state are merely tallied, and a winner declared. The process to determine eligibility is now at the state election commissions. The system is so crooked, set up so inanely, that they just accept whoever the party places on the ballot. Everyone, E-V-E-R-Y-O-N-E, should have known that Barry was ineligible for the presidency after Alan Keyes made it plain in the election for federal senate, and Barry didn’t deny it. Further, articles were written detailing his African heritage, as well as his lack of true American credentials. The reason I don’t think this is his Occidental College transcript, is because Barry has had all those records sealed so no one can find out what a fraud he is, or what illegalities he has perpetrated.

      Liked by 3 people

  27. Pingback: Crooked as a broken dogleg | Grumpy Opinions

    • #1. He is NOT a Muslim. #2. You do know that being a Muslim does not disqualify you from being the President of the United States don’t you? #3. •The article is datelined “April 1, 2009” and tagged “AP,” supposedly signifying it came from the Associated Press news agency. The date is a giveaway to the hoax (it’s April Fool’s Day), and the text of the article does not at all fit the standard Associated Press stylebook guidelines.

      • There was no such group as “Americans for Freedom of Information” at the time this article began circulating (although someone has since registered a site using that domain name); in fact, a web site for the then-faux organization was established to poke fun at those who believed it did:

      Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/birthers/occidental.asp. Snopes.com is owned and run by David and Barbara Mikkelson of California, who have not hidden their identities as one of the viral email …

      Like

      • I am an expert on Islam and Immigration law, namely the Aliens and Nationality Acts starting with the 1790 First Uniform Naturalization Act to the 1965 revisions, and various Supreme Court bastardizations.
        Under Indonesian law, Dunham’s Indonesian marriage to Sotoro also made all her minor children Indonesian citizens, which Obama took full advantage of at Occidental. However, U.S. nationality law gave Obama the chance to regain his citizenship at birth (different from natural born citizenship) if he resided continuously (no summers in Indonesia or Lahore) in the U.S. five years, from age 14 to 21 (IIRC).
        Is he a Muslim? Under Islamic law he is. There are no baptism records . . . and he swore the oath on a copy of the Quran purported to be from Thomas Jefferson’s personal library, the very Quran that cancels out any oath or promise made to an Infidel.
        While the Certificate of Live Birth and the Short Form may be genuine under Hawaiian statute (338-5) the April 26 long form was quickly discovered to be a digital forgery.

        Like

  28. The alleged Occidental College transcript form your displaying is not from Occidental College. The form questions are printed in Indonesian (aka Bahasa Indonesia). They speak English at Occidental. Your form is from an Indonesian school Obama attended as a child.

    Tatan Syuflana, an Indonesian AP reporter and photographer took the photo in 2007. The photo showed Obama’s registration card at the Assisi school.

    Like

    • At the time, Indonesian law required that Obama, then known as Barry Soetoro (legally adopted by his step father Lolo Soetoro), be an Indonesian citizen to attend an Indonesian school. Was the school not Indonesian?

      Liked by 2 people

      • Indeed. Obama was of Indonesian citizenship. In fact, in his student loan he himself signed the application claiming to be an Indonesian citizen. He applied for a student loan as a foreign student in America. Obama is an illegal president. How and why this has happened that he has been supported to illegally take office is a mystery.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Do you folks not understand the principle of dual citizenship? The US doesn’t recognize it, but other countries do. So, unless you renounce your US citizenship, the US considers you American. But, for other countries, provided you quality for citizenship, they’ll give you citizenship. America considers me solely American. the UK considers me to have dual citizenship. That means I can vote and claim welfare in the UK if I chose. The two are not incompatible. Is that such a hard concept to grasp? Or are you so poisoned with hatred for the a black man in the White House, that you have to dwell in an ALice in Wonderland alternate reality?

        Like

      • Winchester171 Dual citizenship is only by treaty. Dual Nationality is a set of Aliens and Nationality law that determines which nationality is prevalent, and which ‘latent.’ The latent nationality can be lost . . . or regained . . . Obama flipped from British to U.S. to Indonesian and then back to U.S. based on these laws. Coming of age has a major contribution to which nationality prevails. If Obama had not attended Occidental in the U.S., he would have permanently lost his U.S. citizenship at age 16.

        Like

      • <>
        This was attorney Phil Berg’s argument. However, under 8 USC 1409 Dunham met the post age 14 residency requirements, because the Obama-Dunham marriage wasn’t legal. Bigamy may be a big thing in Islam, but not legal in the U.S. So, whether Obama, Jr was born in Kenya or Hawaii, he was a statutory/naturalized ‘citizen at birth,’ . . . but not a Natural Born Citizen. That, since the time of the adoption of our constitution, required a U.S. citizen father.

        Like

You can comment using Facebook, Google+, Twitter or Wordpress!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s