Muslims WorldWide

Gay Saudi Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir who killed his black slave sent back to Arabia to serve lifetime prison sentence

Another monster of Islam is going home with a criminal record. The violent, inhumane, unethical and cruel Saudi’s – living off wealth from oil trade with the West – who come to our cities to indulge in drug and sex orgies, purchase prostitutes and expensive designer goods, are ill-reputed around the world for their penance for extreme and brutal violence. In Arabia they don’t get punished for their crimes, unless they’re poor of course.  Saudi’s tend to avoid the U.S. due to zero tolerance against gruesome crimes, while the UK and Europe has an absurd weak legal system where crime is almost encouraged.

Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir is a direct family member of the Saud royal family. And what exactly does this mean? It means he is a direct descendant of another murderer and torturer: “prophet” Mohammed.  Although homosexuality is punishable by death according to the Qur’an, the Muslim world is covered in gays. But because of the strict punishment of gays, Muslims refuse to acknowledge their act as gay. They deny being gay. The usual hypocrisy that we see over and over again with Muslims whenever they want to distort anything for their benefit is applied even to all their gay relations. A gay is a ‘bottom’ while a Muslim man who is a ‘top” is not gay but ‘masculine’. No one wants to be a ‘bottom’.

Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir is the typical London tourist Saudi Prince. The gay prince traveled to London to indulge in gay porn, gay sex, pick up strangers and indulge in alcohol fueled drug orgies. He had brought with him a human slave, his black ‘servant’  Bandar Abdullah Abdulaziz. Employees to Saudi’s have their passports stripped from them. They cannot leave the country without the written consent of their employer. Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir has obviously flown into the city with a private plane. In London Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir regularly beat his black servant slave – and one such beating was caught by the hotel’s CCTV cameras.

Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir was sentenced to “life” which in British language means half time. He is now being sent back to Arabia to serve his “remaining sentence”. In reality, what does this mean? It means that the prince served merely three years for murder and will soon be free to purchase another slave which he can sodomize, beat and abuse on a daily basis. There is no punishment for this behavior in Arabia, the land of Wahhabi monsters, pedophiles, Sharia murderers and terrorist funding. Women, for example, can be killed by their husband without any case or punishment being meted for such behavior.


Gay Saudi prince who killed manservant to serve jail term at home

A homosexual Saudi prince jailed for life in Britain for killing his manservant is to serve the rest of his sentence in his home country, it emerged today.
A homosexual Saudi prince jailed for life in Britain for killing his manservant is to serve the rest of his sentence in his home country, it emerged today.

Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir was jailed in 2010 for killing Bandar Abdullah Abdulaziz in their five-star hotel suite in London Photo: AFP/Getty Images

9:00AM GMT 06 Feb 2013

Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir, a grandson of Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah II, was jailed in 2010 for killing Bandar Abdullah Abdulaziz at their five-star hotel suite in London.

He was convicted at the Old Bailey, after the court heard he had subjected his aide to a “sadistic” campaign of violence and sexual abuse, which culminated in the “brutal” assault.

The 36-year-old, a member of one of the world’s richest and most powerful dynasties, was told he must serve a minimum term of 20 years in jail for the Valentine’s Day night out attack, fuelled by champagne and “Sex on the Beach” cocktails.

Today, government sources confirmed that Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, had approved the prince’s transfer to a jail in Saudi Arabia.

It was not specified when the prince would be transferred, but The Times reported that he was expected to fly home within weeks.

He is one of 11 Saudi citizens in British jails that are eligible for the transfers home.

Under the prisoner transfer agreement, which came into operation in August, five Britons currently languishing in Saudi prisons can ask to serve the remainder of their sentences in the UK.

The Ministry of Justice said it did not comment on individual prison transfer cases.

File:House of Saud rulers.svg

The Arab pseudo-royal family Saud, dating back to the lineage of the cruel and deranged pedophile and warlord Mohammed.


A spokeswoman added: “We have a prison transfer arrangement with Saudi Arabia which allows nationals of either country to serve their prison sentence in their home state.”

Saud denied that he was homosexual during his high-profile trial but the jury was told that he had ordered gay escorts in London. He had also frequently looked at websites for gay massage parlours and escort agencies.

His lawyers argued that he could face the death penalty in Saudi Arabia over the revelations of homosexuality.

The bruised and swollen face of black sex slave and man servant  Bandar Abdullah Abdulaziz is covered under a hat. His right eye is bruised, the nose broken and swollen. Hotel staff in London had observed that Bandar did not eat anything when the Prince was dining at the hotel, but seemed to have pain while he sipped on a drink. They did not understand that Bandar was an abuse victim and a human sex slave. Poor Bandar has been suspected of being tortured, raped and beaten on a daily basis without ever being able to escape. Bandar was from Sudan, likely imported to Saudi Arabia as a child.

The jury heard that the prince was fuelled by champagne and cocktails when he beat and strangled Abdulaziz to death on February 15, 2010.

A post-mortem found that Abdulaziz had suffered heavy blows to the head, injuries to the brain and ears and severe neck injuries consistent with strangulation by hand.

Prosecutors said bite marks on his cheeks showed a clear “sexual element” to the killing, which also involved up to 37 separate blows. The prince then tried to cover up the murder.

Following the attack he had ordered two glasses of milk and some water, dragged the corpse into the bed, and tried to clean up the blood.

He told police that the victim had gained his injuries in an attack on a London street “weeks before”, but the hotel’s CCTV footage recorded the attack.

The judge had declared he had used Mr Abdulaziz, originally from Sudan, as a “human punch bag”.

Gay Saudi dancing away in a Saudi Palace party:

Gay Saudi in uniform (later arrested in Saudi Arabia):

3 thoughts on “Gay Saudi Prince Saud bin Abdulaziz Bin Nasir who killed his black slave sent back to Arabia to serve lifetime prison sentence


    Sunni ‘Ulama have ruled on the Permissibility of Having Sex with WATERMELONS

    That was not a typographical error. Ibn Qayyim continues this discussion, which exemplifies the morals espoused by Sunni Islam:

    “If a man makes a hole in a watermelon, or a piece of dough, or a leather skin, or a statue, and has sex with it, then this is the same as what we have said about other types of masturbation [i.e., that it is halaal in the same circumstances given before, such as being on a journey]. In fact, it is easier than masturbating with one’s hand”.


    All the Muslims should certainly be grateful that Ibn Qayyim has offered this advice on the easiest way to masturbate, and clearly Ibn Qayyim has done a lot of personal research on this issue. This is the ruling of the “saved sect”: Contracting temporary marriage with a woman is haram, but contracting temporary marriage with a watermelon is halaal. In his defence, perhaps Ibn Qayyim only meant that it is allowed to marry a watermelon with the intent of divorcing it, for doing Mut’ah with a watermelon would clearly be an act of fornication.

    Let us remember the words of Dr. Salamah quoted at the beginning of this book:
    Mut’ah, on the other hand, is an open license for sexual pleasure with as many women as one can financially afford. The women who engage in Mut’ah are hired women; thus, it can be performed with all women irrespective of their age, character, conduct or religion. It requires no witnesses, nor is there any obligation on the man’s part to provide food and shelter to the woman.

    • Well, it seems that in the Nasibi logic having sex with as many women as one can afford is utterly immoral, but having sex with as many watermelons as one can afford is not. Based on this, let us ask him some questions about the Ahkam related to having sex with watermelons:Are there any conditions as to the age of the watermelon? For example, is it allowed to perform a marriage with the intent to divorce with a newly grown watermelon, or must one wait until the watermelon is nine years old?
    • Must it be a pious watermelon, or is it permissible to contract a marriage with the intent to divorce with a watermelon that is known to “get around”?
    • May a pious brother share his watermelon with another pious brother, or would the second man’s marriage with the intent to divorce constitute an act of fornication unless the watermelon observes proper ‘iddah?
    • Are witnesses required in the marriage with the intent to divorce of a watermelon? May other watermelons serve as witnesses in that marriage, since according to Sunni fiqh all marriages require witnesses? Applying the Sunni principle of Qiyas (analogy), we can strongly argue that if it is allowed to marry (with intention of divorce) a watermelon, than certainly it is allowed for a watermelon to bear witness to another watermelon’s blessed and chaste marriage.

    • What about oranges?

    Really, we have to ask all reasonable Muslims: would you rather follow ‘ulama that rule on the permissibility of having sex with fruits and vegetables, or follow the pious path of the Holy Imams (as), of whom Allah (swt) has said:
    We intend, O Family of the Prophet, to remove from you all impurity, and to give you a through purification.
    Al-Qur’an, Surah Al-Ahzab, Ayah 33
    Does somebody who spends his time thinking about whether or not it is permissible to have sex with watermelons really sound like somebody who has been removed of all impurity? Why is Ibn Qayyim even thinking about such things? What kind of personal life does such a person have that would lead him to debate such issues in his mind? What happened in Ibn Qayyim’s life that one day he woke up and said: “I really need to find out if its halaal to have sex with watermelons.” Is the type of clergymen who openly rules for the permissibility of having sex with watermelons (with conditions, of course, such as that one is on a journey) be the kind of person you would want to meet in a dark alley, much less do taqlid of?



Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s