Muslims in Europe

Iran: The Sharia manual of the Supreme leader Ayatollah Khomeini: “Sex with infants and animals is OK”

A “supreme” spiritual leader to some. A mental case with deep psychological issues to others. Iranian’s still worship his tomb.

 The Ayatollah

Ayatollah Khomeini’s importance to the revolution is hard to overstate. He was not just the unifying figure but its architect and emotional, spiritual touchstone. The crowds that gathered for his return from exile and for his funeral ten years later were some of the largest and most emotional in Iran’s history. In between these events he ruled Iran. [8A]

A senior Shi’ite Muslim cleric (a “Grand Ayatollah”), Khomeini was from the beginning of his public life a devoted enemy of Iran’s then ruler, the Shah Muhammad Reza Pahlavi and everything the Shah stood for: secularism and Westernization. It was Khomeini’s 1963 arrest that provoked the first massive demonstrations against the Shah, and Khomeini who worked to inspire and lead clerical opposition to the Shah during his 14 years in exile.

Khomeini’s first book was Kashf al-Asrar, aka Secrets Unveiled, was published in 1942 “to little notice,” while Khomeini was still a minor cleric. A short, unsigned book/pamphlet its ostensive theme was a defense of Shi’ism against theological attacks by its Islamic arch-rival the Wahhabi sect. Those who’ve written about Khomeini describe its actual theme as (variously): an attack on Iran’s recently deposed ruler the militant anti-clerical modernizer Reza Shah, on the renegade Shi’a clergymen who had collaborated with the Shah, or on the “growing number of secular intellectuals” in Iran — specifically a popular, influential writer by the name of Ahmad Kasravi. Kasravi was assassinated three years later by Fedayeen of Islam, an early Islamist terrorist group. According to Iranian journalist Amir Taheri, the assassins interpreted Khomeini’s book as a fatwa (Islamic legal decree) calling for Kasravi’s death. [1B]

1. The Little Green Book
2. Kohmeini Works
3. A Clarification of Questions: an Unabridged Translation of Resaleh Towzih al-Masael 
4. Khomeini’s books in original farsi (PDF)
5. Tahrir al-Vasileh in original

Khomeini on Killing and Conquest

No complete English translation of the book/pamphlet has ever been published as far as I can tell, but Amir Taheri did translate a snippet of it where Khomeini explains the importance of war, violence and conquest for Muslims:

Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world.But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world … Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless.

Islam says: kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers]?

Islam say: Kill them [the non-Muslims], put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]. Does this mean sitting back until [non-Muslims] overcome us?

Islam says: kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to the enemy?

Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors!

There are hundreds of other ayat [Qur’anic verses] and ahadith urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim. [2B]

Some more nuggets from Kashf al-Asrar were translated for The Little Green Book, a book of Khomeini quotes published after the 1979 Islamic Revolution as a takeoff on “The Little Red Book” of legendary Chinese Communist leader Mao Tse Tung.

On the Danger of Music

We affirm that music engenders immorality, lust, and licentiousness, and stifles courage, valor, and the chivalrous spirit; it is forbidden by Quranic laws and must not be taught in the schools.[3B]

On the Danger of any Innovation in Islamic Law

If anyone, in the guise of pursuing Islamic justice, interprets the Law in a manner contrary to the divine will, he has committed the sin of innovation. Learned men are bound to condemn him or they will themselves be condemned. [4B]

On the Impurity and Inferior Status of non-Muslims

Writing in the book’s foreword, Michael M. J. Fischer and Mehdi Abedi compare the status of non-Muslims to dalator “untouchables” in India, and suggesting its grounded more in culture than theology.

There are eleven things which are impure: urine, excrement, sperm, bones, blood, dogs, pigs, non-Moslem men and women, wine, beer, and the sweat of the excrement-eating camel. (#83 (from Resaleh p.48))

Every part of the body of a non-Moslem individual is impure, even the hair on his hand and his body hair, his nails, and all the secretions of his body. (#107 (Resaleh p.51))

The impurity of the non-Muslims is serious enough to go into some detail about. If someone converts to Islam they “automatically” have “a pure body, and pure saliva, nasal secretions, and perspiration.” All clear? Not quite. “As for converts’ clothing, if it has been in contact with their sweating bodies before they became converted, it remains impure.” (Resaleh#207-208)

The Non-Muslim’s impurity also prevents them from being allowed to possess a copy of the Qur’an

One must avoid giving the Koran to an infidel; it is even recommended that it be forcibly taken away from him if he already has it in his hands. (#139 (Resaleh p.54))

— which clashes with another Islamic tenant — that every effort should be made to spread Islam — “until” as Khomeini would say, “the cry `There is no God but God` resounds over the whole world,” [7C] — by persuade non-Muslims to convert (“revert”) to Islam and other means.

Another restriction gives non-Muslims a major financial incentive to convert to Islam

A Moslem will inherit from an infidel but an infidel will not inherit from a Moslem even though he is the deceased’s father or son. (#2783)

In current Islamic Republic of Iran where Khomeini’s fatwa was made law, this is an issue of great concern to the non-Muslim minority. As Parviz Ravani, the Zoroastrian MP complained to journalist Robin Wright, [8C]

… if my child becomes a Muslim, then all my property will go to that child upon my death. None of my other children who didn’t convert will stand to get anything. That extends even to my nephew. If he becomes a Muslim, then all my property would go to him, not my own children.`

On Fornication and Sodomy

Considering the strict and detailed laws on just about everything else, you might assume Khomeini would be especially disapproving on sexual sins. But his fatwas on them seem oddly matter-of-fact

During sexual intercourse, if the penis enters a woman’s vagina or a man’s anus, fully or only as far as the circumcision ring, both partners become impure, even if they have not reached puberty; they must consequently perform their ablutions. (#104 or #349, (Resaleh p.72))

Why a child’s fornicating makes it less in need of purification afterwards is not explained! Nor is why the sodomites wouldn’t be headed off to get their lashes in punishment rather than worrying about proper cleanliness for salat prayer!

If a person fornicates with one’s paternal or maternal aunt before marrying their daughter, he can no longer marry them [i.e. marry their daughters, his cousins]. #2394

But on the other hand if the fornication happens after the marriage to the cousin is agreed upon ….

There is no concern in the [marriage] contract involving a person who marries his own cousin (paternal or maternal) and fornicates with their mother before having intercourse with them [his cousin]. [i.e. there’s no question about being able to marry the cousin.] #2395

The same interest in strangely legalistic tangent on fornication goes when gay sex is involved. There are restrictions on who the sodomite may marry, but nothing said about punishment. …

The mother and sister and daughter of a boy who performed sodomy are unlawful to the sodomite even if the doer and giver of sodomy are both minors. … #2405

If he [the sodomite] marries the mother or sister or daughter of a person and then practices sodomy with that person, they do not become unlawful to him. #2406

The same restrictions apply to women from families “related” to the “boy who performed sodomy” as “as a result of suckling”, (i.e. where a woman breast-fed a baby from the other family) #2482.

Bestiality also seems to get light treatment. Fatwas warn of that sodomized animals are impure (#86), should be “taken out of the city and sold elsewhere” if a horse or mule (#2631), or burnt if a cow, sheep or camel (#2632), and that the sodomizer has to clean themselves by ritual bathing (#351). But the only punishment mentioned for the sodomite is reimbursing the animal’s owner if the animal is destroyed.

If they have intercourse with a cow and sheep and camel their [the animals] urine and dung becomes unclean and drinking their milk will also be unlawful and they [the animals] must be killed and burned without delay, and the person who had intercourse with them must pay money to the owner. Further, if he had intercourse with any beast its milk becomes unlawful. #2632.

Was inter generational fornication and sodomy even between close relatives so common the fatwas were necessary to sort out restrictions on the different variations? Is that why Khomeini makes no mention of punishment for fornication? Had he given up on enforcing that and just hoped the fornicators were ritually clean for their prayers?
Or did Khomeini not talk about punishments because Islamic government was not in power and not in a position to enforce them?

Khomeini on Enjoining the Good and Forbidding the Evil

Traditionally Muslims are commanded not just to preach to others, but to command them to do what is good and not do what is evil – evil being both acts universally agreed to be crimes (larceny, rape, murder, etc), and religious sins (eating pork, drinking wine, ignoring fast during the holy months of Ramadan, etc.). Khomeini’s guidelines on how to deal with sinners start with giving them a warning, then “refraining from conversing” with them, then “breaking all relations with the sinner” (#2807), and work their way up to “beating the sinner” #2823, and finally “wounding and slaying” them. (#2824) Bodily harm is only “acceptable” if “permitted by a fully qualified Expert,” an expert meaning an expert in Islamic law such as the Ayatollah Khomeini.

On Slavery

The idea that slavery no longer exists in Islam not withstanding, the book’s index lists eight questions and clarifications under the heading of slavery. (The book was originally published in 1961!) One (confusing) example concerns the importance of sellers being able to deliver their goods

… selling a horse which has escaped is incorrect, but if an escaped slave is sold together with something deliverable, like a carpet, that deal is correct even though the slave is never found. And in the case other than a slave it is difficult. #2090

Those concerned about any anti-Khomeini bias in the English edition, will be reassured by comments in the book’s foreword. Khomeini’s fatwas discriminating against non-Muslims (we are told) are part of the “defenses of Islam,” which “meld easily into a defiance of colonial subjugation.” Those “who in the early days of the 1978-79 Revolution sought to discredit Khomeini by citing from his Resaleh Towzih al-Masa’il minute rules having to do with how to purify oneself after bodily elimination, after sexual activity, or indeed what exactly constitutes such offenses as bestiality” (allegedly) made themselves ridiculous by “taking these debates to absurd lengths” and displaying “a complete lack of comprehension of the logic of the traditions composing the Risaleh Towzih al-Masa’il.” (Resaleh p.xxviii) [9C]

And indeed an attempt by at least one Khomeini opponent (Shoja-ud-din Shafa) to publicize Resaleh Towzih al-Masa’il fell flat, leaving Khomeini’s popularity undiminished. [10C] Maybe that’s the most remarkable thing about Resaleh Towzih al-Masa’il: Though it showed him preoccupied with issues more of interest to a medieval village mullah than a revolutionary leader (Khomeini wasn’t a grad student when he “wrote” this book, but nearly 60), it did nothing to slow that mullah on the path leading to the take over a nation of 60 million and creation of a legend. A testament to the shrewdness of Khomeini and the haplessness of his royal opponent perhaps.

Khomeini on Muslim Apostates —
the Different Definitions of, and Punishments for

1 – Apostasy is leaving Islam and accepting infidelity. One who turns from Islam to infidelity is called an apostate and that is of two kinds:
A) innate-apostate, and that is a person that one of his father or mother was Moslem when his seed was being jelled, and who embraced Islam following puberty and then left Islam.
B) National apostate, and that is a person whose father and mother were infidels when his seed was being jelled and he has expressed infidelity after puberty, and became an original infidel (kafar i aslee), then he embraced Islam and later has returned to infidelity; such as a person who originally was a Christian and became a Moslem and then returned to Christianity.
[6D]2 – Innate-apostate’s [embracing of] Islam is apparently unacceptable and, if a man, his ruling is execution and, if a woman, she is condemned to prison for life and [with] beating when praying and straitening of livelihood, but her repenting is acceptable and she will freed if she repents

3 – A national apostate will be caused to repent and in case of refusing to repent will be executed. And it is preferable to give a 3 day reprieve and to execute him on the fourth day if he refused.

4 – Puberty, knowledge, volition and intention are credible in ruling on apostasy.

5 – The child of a Moslem or that of an apostate, whether national or innate, is considered Moslem before the father’s apostasy, and therefore, if the child reached puberty and chose infidelity he will be asked to repent (and to return to Islam), else he will be executed.

6 – Apostasy is proven by the witnessing of two just men and by confession.[7D]

So to sum up:

  • an adult male who grew up Muslim and then converted to a non-Muslim religion, (an “innate-apostate”) must become a Muslim again or be executed. An adult woman who converts to a non-Muslim religion has the choice of reconverting, or being imprisoned and beaten.

Khomeini on the Rights of Non-Muslim or Women Victims

“Conditions of retaliation,” i.e. under what conditions may a person be killed (executed) as punishment for the killing another:

…. (3) Equality in religion, therefore Moslem will not be retaliated for [killing an] infidel, unless a Moslem has a habit of killing infidels.[8D]

“Mulcts and Blood Money,” a mulct being a penalty or fine, in this case for killing another person:

…. (3) The amount of mulct which has come in the table is for a Moslem man, but the mulct of a Moslem woman will be half of these amounts, i.e. 50 camels or 500 dinars
(4) A tributary’s mulct is 8000 derhams [9D] and the mulct of their women is half of that of their men.

So again to summarize:

(Note: “Equality in religion” means equality inside the different religions, not between the religions. All other things being equal, all Muslims who kill another Muslim are treated equally. Muslims who kill non-Muslims are treated equally, etc. … Okay, it’s not equality between genders inside the religion either. Khomeini must have thought that was too obvious to mention.)

On the “Poll Tax” Charged to Non-Muslims

  • A non-Muslim who converted to Islam and then went back to their old faith (a “National apostate”) gets the same, although they get a few days to think it over and repent.
  • Although the verbiage of Khomeini and/or his translator isn’t completely clear, it appears Khomeini includes in his definition of apostates some people who NEVER professed the Islamic faith. These are people who grew up as a non-Muslim and remained so but whose father left Islam after they were born. (If a father is a Muslim, so are the children no matter how young.) Having “chosen infidelity” the offspring “will be asked to repent” and “executed” if they refuse.
    (This may explain the reasoning behind the persecution of Baha’is in Iran by fundamentalist Shi’a. Those who grew up Baha’i and are not converts are still considered apostates because Baha’ism split off from Shi’a Islam so recently.)
  • Capital punishment for the killing of a Muslim is acceptable, but not for the killing of a non-Muslim if the murderer is a Muslim … unless that Muslim is a serial (non-Muslim) killer.
  • the fine for the premeditated killing of a Muslim man should be 10,000 derhams, 1000 dinars, or 100 camels.
  • 8000 derhams, 800 dinars, or 80 camels for a non-Muslim man a.k.a. a “tributary,” (i.e. a Jew, Christian, or Zoroastrians who “lives under the protection of Islam,” i.e. under a Muslim government and pays tribute).
  • 5000 derhams, 500 dinars, etc. for killing a Muslim woman.
  • 4000 derhams, etc. for a non-Muslim woman.

On Sex and Women

Finally, there’s a source of quotes from Tahrir al-Vasileh that’s spread throughout the internet to “anti-Islamist” websites. They can be traced back to the website of the “Dr. Darabi Foundation” (a secular, anti-Khomeini non-profit named after a prominent Iranian woman physician of the same name who set “herself on fire in a crowded square in northern Tehran, on February 21, 1994 … to protest the oppression of women.”).

The foundation declares itself dedicated to combating “all violations of human rights focusing on defending the rights of women against religious, cultural and social abuse.”

Many of the quotes are similar to one’s above from Resaleh Towzih al-Masael, but a couple are even creepier. (It’s not listed in very complete database of books found in libraries called WorldCat (
(Perhaps it’s a cross between Resaleh Towzih al-Masael and Resaleh Towzih al-Masael!)

With that caution, here are some translations from

A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.

From Khomeini’s book, Tahrirolvasyleh, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990

(Note: This quote is found many places on the Web, often citing, but is no longer at itself as far as I can tell.)

Khomeini’s Teachings on sex with infants and animals Islamic Teachings on sex with infants:

A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister.

The complete Persian text of this saying can be found in “Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh,” Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom

49 thoughts on “Iran: The Sharia manual of the Supreme leader Ayatollah Khomeini: “Sex with infants and animals is OK”

  1. Pingback: UK Muslims defend Mufa’khathat – the legalized incest of infants – Skender Jashari

  2. This is retarded why are we allowing these pedofiles to exist is beyond me. They need to be tortured and killed every Muslim deserves to die for even considering Islam as a religion


  3. Pingback: Iran: Sex With Animals And Infant Babies Is "OK" In Iranian Law | liveleak fun

  4. At what age is a person capable of making an informed decision about whether or not to engage in sex? 7, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18? Over the last 50 years in the United States, all have been the law in various states within the past 50 years.

    In the past 100 years the age of consent in US states has gone from most states having an age of consent of 10 (with exceptions) to most states having an age of consent of 16 (with exceptions).
    Exception: Marriage which nullified any age of consent law.
    Exception: Chaste Character nullified any age of consent laws allowing any age to have sex if the girl was already not a virgin or was arbitrarily not considered of chaste character despite having been a virgin which usually applied to prostitutes or children of prostitutes. The virginity portion the thought was that once someone had sex there was no legal reason to stop them from having sex again as long as they consented to it. These laws were not revoked until 1998 in some areas.

    50 years ago the state of Delawares age of consent was 7. It was raised in the mid 1960s. During this same time period there was a legal movement by the American Law Institute to lower all states back down to 10 as they considered the new federal age of 16 to be an overreach that infringed on states rights, and was against the will of the majority as both the age of consent laws and prohibition laws were passed by small special interest groups who were very outspoken and lobbied congress directly not by a vote of the people.

    The age of legal culpability is 7. That’s when you can be arrested, imprisoned, and forced to register as a sex offender. 7 throughout the US (the youngest life sentence in the US was 10).

    The age of normal puberty begins at 7. Precocious puberty is 6 or earlier and can be at only a few months which is why the youngest mom was 4 when she got pregnant. The average age of puberty is also dropping as in some areas a full 25% of girls have menses and breast growth before reaching age 8. In all areas the majority of girls have reached puberty by 10 (girls are used as the example because in almost all legal cases girls are considered the victim despite the fact they mature at a rate 2-4 years ahead of boys until their early twenties when boys catch up.).

    Currently in the United States the laws vary widely from state to state with most being 16, some being 17, and some being 18. The age of pornography and prostitution however are all set at 18 across the board. Due to the extreme variance in protections provided to teenage couples and the disparity between the age of consent, the age of puberty, and the age of pornography, it has caused not only thousands of people to go to prison and forced to register as sex offenders for life over consensual relationships but it has also caused thousands of children and teens to go to prison and be forced to register as sex offenders for as minor of a crime as taking a racy clothed photo of themselves as lewdity laws do not require nudity. Nudity can in fact be legal while a clothed photo can be illegal as the judgement for lewd photos is based on the visual intent and focus of the photo.

    In the Christian/Jewish bible the age of sexual suitability is 3 years and 1 day old as stated by God directly to Moses in Deuteronomy and Numbers and further supported by Talmud law clarifying it was correct and legal and not a misinterpretation or out of context.

    In Koran/Hadith it is legal to marry any age girl even a 1 year old infant but they are not considered suitable for penetrative sex until they reach puberty. Mohammed himself and many other Muslims practice/d the act of “thighing” which is placing your penis against a girls vagina and squeezing her thighs around it in order to simulate penetrative sex without any actual penetration. This has been upheld numerous times by Muslim leaders as an acceptable thing to do with your wife until she is old enough for actual sex.

    In Hindu texts the age of sexual suitability is stated as 4 year old.

    What are you views on the modern western age of consent? Should it be raised to 21 like some countries? Lowered to 10 like it was? Removed entirely and replaced with a more scientific measure? Should it match across the board so consent, pornography, and prostitution are all equal to avoid the current issues of children being arrested?


    • Nowhere in the Holy Bible does it state the age of sexual suitability. Show me chapter and verse. It is NOT in there. I challenge everyone who is reading this to search in Numbers and Deuteronomy online for the word,’ three’. You will find NO reference to sexual suitability. Since this is such a gross error, I challenge the validity of the rest of the article.


    • Cohen, you have written a hurly-burly and nonsense comment. How on earth do you know that the prophet of Islam behaved in the disgusting way mentioned?! such crazy comments just shows your deformed thinking. Islam prophet was the most effective person in history according to several texts. there is no valid text declaring your claims. I recommend the book written by Thomas Carlyle called Heroes. May it works for you.


      • Islam prophet [sic] was the most effective person in history …

        Really? Every evaluation I encounter is that Muhammad bin Abdullah was a cutthroat whose crew ran the Jihad Racket. Proselytizing as a spiritual religion was a perfect cover; apparently, among the Arab tribes slicing someone to bits because of clan affiliation was normal. So, awarding converted slicers rights to the slicee’s property, especially the women, with twenty percent of the gross going to the boss, put the thing on a business basis with a life of its own. With the profit incentive, Jihad went viral.

        No one can deny Muhammad’s brilliance. He invented the business franchise fourteen centuries before the world heard of Harlan Sanders and Kentucky Fried Chicken.

        Talk about small business providing opportunity, any knave with a cudgel or a kitchen knife was now a holy warrior with a skies-the-limit business future. And once they’d beaten, robbed, raped, enslaved and butchered every available victim in the Arabian Peninsula they fell upon the rest of the world,

        And Muslims have been hacking their way through us ever since.

        Allah-Hu Akbar, baby. You pick up the Allah brand, or off comes your head.

        Isn’t religion wonderful?


  5. Denial of the barbarity of islam runs deep. These deniers are locked into support of muslims even in the face of overwhelming evidence of attrocities. That is their pattern of behaviour from another cult eg feminism where women deny men and reproduction to become empty confused irresponsible dysfunctional things and take sides with a cult that is everthing they have opposed


  6. It is obvious from a lot of the hadith and the biographies that Muhammad had an unhealthy fascination with sex. Probably because he had a few problems getting his 7th pillar of Islam. Thus I can see how slaves, corpses animals babies,. men, women…dressing in women’s clothing etc had to be used at the earliest opportunity before the “pillar” collapsed. Bestiality and buggery are rife in the Islamic world and all because Muhammad was so sexually insecure that he had to be certain of a virgin so as to not be compared. In addition, he wasn’t going to let his men enjoy themselves until they had chopped off a few kuffar heads and thus earned some slaves. In the absence of this convenient source and the total covering of females which under a hot sun must have a distinct olfactory component . it is no wonder that young frustrated males take it out on anything that moves or has not been dead for long.
    Nothing else shows the dark Age stupidity and Barbarity of Islam quite as well as does this. Congratulations Muhammad even Josef Stalin looks good compared to you.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Pingback: Potential Muslim terrorist hijacking behind Malaysian airplane crash | HINDUISM AND SANATAN DHARMA

  8. Pingback: UK Muslim plot uncovered that aimed to replace teachers in Birmingham schools with radicals | HINDUISM AND SANATAN DHARMA

  9. Well then what in this world is stopping you from posting the pages and/or links from your so-called authentic versions? Because that book only exists in your imagination?


  10. yea you know what? you have already lost your credibility here… so keep inventing your fairy-tales about people who are far beyond your understanding and grasp…


    • your language tells how educated you are! again you keep making fool of yourself by asking me to provide the book…. who is the one who shared this article? me? so who should be providing evidences? me? how did you verify that the books available now are adulterated and the one you have (the imaginary non-existing one) is not the adulterated one??? Go on keep writing dirty things and try to satisfy yourself until you burn in hell for your falsehood..



      • Aren’t you ashamed of spreading falsehood mister? I mean look at that… you have been exposed here completely but ignorance upon ignorance and arrogance upon arrogance, you dont accept your lies just because your heart keeps burning in the hatred of the pious people….. keep burning dear… your hatred will burn you one day..


      • Look Mister, now stop making fool of yourself… anyone with open eyes can read my comments above which only ask for the pages of the books where these fatwas are mentioned and whether there even exists a Fourth Volume of Tahrir al Wasilah or not? All u have done is, post the cover page of the book and post a fatwa with a misleading title and which had nothing to do with fatwas over here… so stop displaying your ignorance please…. seems like I am talking to a kid who doesn’t even what he is saying…


      • you publish from people who weren’t able to verify themselves what they were sharing.. and your ignorance that you didn’t verify it yourself nor did even try to that once and now justify your crime… Good luck with that!!!


    • A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.

      From Khomeini’s book, Tahrirolvasyleh, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990

      This is what i am what talking about u idiot ignorant fool.. Now,look for the fourth volume of this book if it even exists…n then try to verify ur copy paste bullshit


      • Yea now start twisting the terms to satisfy urself… Why don’t do u just get the link to the fatwa jn the book.. I m sure there is online version available for this book …..

        Again one of the biggest bullshit ever.. Fourth volume means fourth edition hahahahah


      • U know what fuck off… It is ur responsibility to post the links to the fatwa or at least snapshots of the pages of these books from where u verified these fatwas…otherwise fuckoff get it? Ir falsehood is bound to perish


      • Instead of speaking bullshit why don’t u get the book and take the snapshots of the pages with the the fatwa of sodomising etc and post them here?? N if u aren’t able to do that then may the hell be ur abode


      • This means u have read all his books why r u ashamed to share the snapshots or the links to the pages? Because u didn’t even dare to verify what u share out of enmity?


      • This is where u r slipping n showing me the fatwa which has nothing to do with the fatwas here.. The fatwa only says that shia might not marry Nasibi (haters of Ahlulbayt)…and the title on the website says that Khumaini forbids shia marrying a Sunni which is again misleading because not all sunnis is are Nasibis


  12. Pingback: Musulmanes verifican el Mufa’khathat – que asegura el incesto legalizado de los lactantes | NUEVA EUROPA- Nueva Eurabia

  13. Pingback: The Abominy Of Khomeini’s Iran | Truth Within, Shines Without

  14. Pingback: Sebuah Selumbar Di Matamu | bacabacaquran

  15. Pingback: Sebuah Selumbar Di Matamu : Baca-baca

  16. All’s allowed for muslim men, men, babies, animals, even dead women. Muslims are most evolved in the sight of allah, who must be another pervert.. Yet these filthy animals preach to us about their high morals and purity.


  17. Pingback: Arabia: Islamic Scholar: The Day Is Coming When Islam Will Rule the World Again « The Muslim Issue

Published under FAIR USE of factual content citing US 17 U.S.C. § 107 fair use protection, Section 107 of the Copyright Act of 1976 and UK Section 30(1) of the 1988 Act.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s