Muslims WorldWide

The Punishment for reading a Bible in Saudi Arabia – photo


Ever had a cut in your finger and it hurts like mad? Well…

punishment for reading bible

(This is a photo rendering of damages, not an actual image from the incident)

Saudi Arabia: This is the new form of punishment in one of the Saudi nations. According to reports sent to us from Arabia, this is a new punishment used on at least one person found to possess a bible. Since then, four more people have come forth and confirmed that they have seen people with similar punishments. Saudi Arabia refuses to recognize the religion of immigrants, and allows any non-Muslim within a certain distance of Mecca to be killed.

Sharia punishment

“Crucifixion is a hadd punishment, stipulated in the Quran, Sura 5:33, and therefore an obligatory part of Shariah.”  The crucified man, branded as Christian, is Saleh Ahmed Saleh Al-Jamely who was executed on February 12, 2012 after being convicted by a court managed by Ansar Al-Shari’a accused of being a “Saudi spy” and placing two chips in two cars that were later targeted by U.S. drones.

Apart from their Sharia law, based on the doctrine’s of their ‘prophet’ Mohammed (warlord and pedophile) Saudi Arabia has been short of head-choppers for their 2,500+ decapitations per year PER executioner and have been advertising to fill these dirty positions for quite sometime.

An executioner is a job done by ‘lower status’ individual and is a position that is paid per execution by the government under confidentiality agreements. The government also provides the sword. The Saudi government has been considering firing squads to fill the shortage of executioners.
Executioners have said they are “proud to do God’s work”. But is it a god or a man who sentence these people, without a fair trial, tortured into confessions?

islamic school

Textbooks handed out in Saudi Arabian schools teach children how to cut off a thief’s hands and feet under Sharia law – Photo Daily Mail.  The books were published and handed out to 9th and 10th-graders despite Saudi Arabia’s promises to clean up textbooks in the kingdom. Ali Al-Ahmed, director of the Institute for Gulf Affairs, told Fox News: ‘This is where terrorism starts, in the education system. ‘They show students how to cut (the) hand and the feet of a thief,’ he said.The textbooks were printed for the 2010-2011 academic year and translated from Arabic by the institute. In one, for ninth-graders, students are taught the annihilation of the Jewish people is imperative. In addition to calling for the murder of Jews, the texts reportedly call women “weak” and teach that gays are dangerous and should be put to death.

And it doesn’t get better in other Muslim societies. Sharia is prevalent in all of them, with more or less extreme measures. The Iranian government announced new legal punishment tools under Sharia: an electronic saw is now being used to cut off hands, fingers and feet [see picture from government announcement below].

Iran: A man gets his hand cut off. In January 2013 the Iranian government published pictures of a new tool for cutting fingers and hands off people. The machine, resembling a saw, was used for the public amputation of an adulterer’s fingers on Wednesday. The images were published by on of Iran’s official press agencies. Apparently the machine has been used before, but it’s not clear for how long. The machine intends to replace manual cutting of limbs by knife..

Challenge:

Many Muslims commenting on our blog claim these punishments are fake  and that Islam is the religion of peace, being slandered by non-Muslims, and that they have no problems reading a bible in their country. This can be easily proven. We challenge any Muslim in UAE, Kuwait, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, to come forth and provide a video clip of them reading a bible with their full face visible. Include the address and we will forward the clip to the Muttawwa of the country. You can then send a videoclip from the office of the Muttawwa with yourself and your bible, and an official letter from the police confirming you had no restrictions or problems reading your bible. You can also film yourself in Mecca reading a bible in public view. Forward this to us to prove these claims are false, and we will publish the letter and the video clip to provide evidence to your claim.

____________________

Related:

1.  Saudi Court Sentences Blogger To Seven Years And 600 Lashes Under Sharia Law
2.  (Video) Britanistan: “We will not integrate. We will only follow Sharia. Soon we will see Sharia in U.S., UK, Europe”
3.  ISNA Reinvents ‘Sharia’ for Western Consumption
4.  (Video) Sharia law: Islamic Hand Cutting
5.  (Video) Australian girl and her rape ordeal in Liberal Dubai, and its Sharia law
6.  Statistics: The Muslim World’s Problem: Over 70% Of Muslims Support Sharia Law, 90% Support Execution Of Apostates
7.  Cleric instructs: Make Sharia sound appealing to attract kafirs to support it. Don’t tell them about cutting hands and feet.
8.  Third Muslim beheading attempt takes place in London within weeks. How many more unreported ones are there?
9.  [Graphic images] 12-Year Old Muslim Boy’s First Beheading
10.  (Video) Saudi Arabia: Nameless Filipino Maid Subject to Savage Muslim Assault and Rape in the Middle East (Graphic!). And it’s all legal under Sharia to assault, enslave and kill non-Muslims.
11.  Jordan teens think “honor killings” are justified, study says
12.  (Fox Report Video) America’s New Nightmare: Muslim Honor Killings
13.  California “racist hate crime” of Muslim woman turns out to be honor killing. Husband arrested.
14.  Muslims commit 91% of all honor killings worldwide
15.  A letter about Stoning to Death
16.  (Statistics) Muslim countries, obsessed with women’s ‘honour’, have one of the highest rape scales in the world

415 thoughts on “The Punishment for reading a Bible in Saudi Arabia – photo

  1. Pingback: What’s up in Saudi Arabia today 2014-10-15 | Shohk.com

  2. Pingback: US/World Issues Discussion (View at your own discretion) - Page 140 - Taurus Car Club of America : Ford Taurus Forum

  3. I swear guys this is not true. dont do that and ruin reputation. Muslim are peaceful and Islam is the peaceful. guys you will never be happy. how you lie and ruin innocent people reputation and you have hope to go to haven. please delete it

    Muslim guy
    sincerely

    Like

  4. Pingback: Papa Francesco ha definito i musulmani fratelli - La PUNIZIONE Islamica per leggere la Bibbia | realtà o fantasia ?!

  5. saudians are the true creation of shaitan . . they are inhuman they dont deserve to be classified as human beings because the majority of them have no souls only human have souls .. . they dont know the difference between good and bad

    Like

    • Please just shut up, if you’re trying to be cool by pointing a finger at us muslims and insulting us than you’re just making yourself look like an idiot.
      I repeat, you’re only looking at the Saudian GOVERNMENT which is like 2% of the whole muslim population so you’re judging us by basing yourself on the actions of extremists.
      Please just shut up, we are all humans, what ever they did was already done by your countries more times than us.

      Like

  6. I’m just gonna say that you people (the site’s admins/writers and those who agree with them) are lowering yourselves to the racists’ level.
    I hold a respect for all religions since a lot of my friends are christian and some even atheist.
    I am a Muslim and I too know of and am shocked by the ‘punishments’ administrated by the the Saudi government but all I can say is that people like you only tend to look at a minority of the Islamic population (I mean the terrorist and the unjust extremists) and judge the rest of us that way. Judging a whole religion based on the actions of a minority shows how much people can be stupid hypocrites.
    While you brag about living under an ‘ethical’ and ‘just’ government, let me ask you this
    How much corruption exists in your country? How much criminals/gangs/rapists/mafia/murderers/etc… exist in your country ?
    You think you can blame those actions you speak of on a religion? BULLSHIT
    All humans are created the same, your countries’ governments used to be the same as ours so SHUT.THE.FUCK.UP!!
    I am a Muslim and I am proud of my religion that’s why I can’t let ignorant pieces of shit like you insult our prophet or ANY prophet like Jesus since he is mentioned in the Q’uran as one and I admire him like I admire all of God’s messengers and serveants and God himself.
    I just hope God forgives you because I will not!!

    Like

    • RAPE JIHAD

      THE NEANDERTHAL BRAINS OF MOHAMMEDANS

      Islamic Teachings on Sex with Dead Humans and Animals
      Islam’s world of unfettered sex: sex with dead spouses and animals; anal sex with women, men and animals…

      MUSLIMS ARE ALLOWED NORMAL SEX WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS

      Muhammad had sex with a dead woman to qualify her for the perks of a prophetic wife.
      According to Hadiths and Sayings of Prophet on issues of women in “Al-Jami Al-Saghir” written by Jalal ul-Din Al-Suyuti.

      Narrated by Ibn Abbas: “I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and SLEPT with her in her coffin.”

      The prophet was referring to Fatima, the mother of Ali, his son-in-law. Commentators have offered differing views about the significance of Muhammad’s sleeping with the dead-body of Fatimah in her coffin, some emphasizing that it had no sexual side. But Arabic scholar Demetrius explains that to express Muhammad sleeping inside Fatima’s coffin with her dead-body, “The Arabic word used here is “Id’tajat”, which literally means “lay down to have sex.”

      Muhammad is also understood to have said that because he slept with her, she has become like a wife to his; so she will be considered like “mother of the believers”.
      After Muhammad slept with her and “consummated”, Medina women routinely offered themselves to Mohammad for sex so that the holy fluid of the prophet released into them will qualify them for paradise. Here is a hadith.

      MUSLIM ARE ALLOWED “ANAL” SEX EVEN WITH DEAD WOMEN AND ANIMALS

      Sahih Muslim, Book of Menstruation, Hadith 525:
      “Our companions have said if a penile head has penetrated a woman’s anus or penile anus, or an animal’s vagina or its anus, then it is necessary to wash…”

      NOW IT MAY AN EGYPTIAN LAW TOO

      Egyptian husbands may be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives – for up to six hours after their death (sex performed after six hours will be considered adultery and the husband will be beheaded and buried with the wife)

      This law is part of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament under ‘religious interpretations’. The subject of a husband having sex with his dead wife arose in May 2011 when Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari said marriage remains valid even after death (Al Arabiya News).
      See cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari’s video, claiming Islamic justification of sex with dead bodies of spouses.

      Anal Sex Approved by Allah and Prophet Muhammad

      In Pakistan, the mullahs are notorious for child abuse and molestation. Every day, we hear news about a mullah sodomizing his beardless student. It is very common in Pakistan. Almost every one knows what happens in madrassas. Even one of my friends narrowly escaped from being sodomized by his Quranic teacher when he was taking the Quran memorizing lessons.

      But why do these mullahs commit such a thing, allegedly condemned in Islam? Muslims are most vocal in commending sodomy, homosexuality in words? They are known to attack homosexuals in Europe.

      Answer is that, according to them, masturbation is haram. Seeing any na mehram girl is also prohibited. The only way left to satisfy their lusty desires is to sodomize one of their pupils. While reading from a shia Website, http://www.answering-ansar.org, I came across the fact that the root of sodomy lies in the Islamic text and history. Here are some examples of the gems from the history and authentic books of Sunni Islam.
      Umar indulged in sodomy and Allah was forced to legitimize this practise in the Qur’an

      For evidence you can consult the following texts:

      • Jami al Tirmidhi, Bab al Tafseer Volume 2, page 382, ‘Ayat Hars’
      • Fathul Bari Volume 8 page 191 Kitab Tafseer Ayat Hars
      • Gharab al Qur’an Volume 3 page 249 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer al Ibn Katheer Volume 1 page 261
      • Fayl ai Lawathar Volume 6 page 229
      • Tafseer Qurtubi Volume 1 page 92 Ayat Hars

      Lets quote verbatim from Jami al Tirmidhi [Bab al Tafseer Vol. 2, p. 382, 'Ayat Hars']:

      “Ibn Abbas narrates that Hadhrath Umar went before Rasulullah (s) and “Master I am destroyed!’. Rasulullah (s) asked ‘what thing has destroyed you?’. Umar replied last night I had anal sex. Rasulullah (s) did not give a reply to Umar, then Allah (swt) sent down this revelation “Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will; the words ‘kabool wa Dhabar’ (the anus is accepted)”

      Abdullah Ibn Umar deemed sodomy to Halaal, like his old man.

      For evidence, please consult the following authentic Sunni texts:
      • Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume 1 page 264 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Qasmi Volume 2 page 220, by Jamaladeen Qasmi
      • Tafseer Qurtubi page 92 Ayat Hars

      Here is the direct quote from Tafseer Durre Manthur:
      “Traditions wherein Abdullah ibn Umar believed sodomy with women are well known and Sahih”.

      Ulema of Madina believed that sodomy was halaal.

      Please see the following Sunni sources:
      • Fayl al Lawathar Volume 6 page 154 Kitab Nikah, Bab Mut’ah
      • Tafseer Qasmi Volume 2 page 223 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Ibn Katheer Volume 1 page 262 Ayat Hars
      • Fathul Bari Volume 8 page 191 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Mazhari, Volume 3, Page 19

      Quoting directly from Fayl al Lawathar:

      “Imam Auzai stated of the Fatwas from Hijaaz that are famous, one fatwa is from the people of Makka is that is that they deemed Mut’ah with women to be permissible, the other from the people of Madina, that sodomy with women is permissible”.
      Ibn Kathir in his Tafseer also stated:

      “Statements on the permissibility of sodomy with women have come from the jurists of Madina”.

      Companions of mohammed deemed sodomy with women to be permissible
      We read in Tafseer Qurtubi Volume 3 page 93 Ayat Hars:

      “Fatwas on the permissibility of sodomy with women Saeed bin Maseeb Nafi, ibn Umar, Muhammad bin Kab, Abdul Malik, Imam Malik, a large group amongst the Sahaba and Tabaeen deemed sodomy to be permissible”.

      Imam Sha’afi deemed sodomy to be permissible!

      Please see the following Sunni texts:
      • Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume 1 page 266, Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Ruh al Ma’ani page 125, Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Ahkam al Qur’an Volume 1 page 265
      • Tafseer Qasmi Volume 2 page 228 Baqarah Verse 223
      • Al Mahzoorath page 268

      We read in Tafseer Durre Manthur:

      “On sodomy with women, Imam Sha’afi no Sahih narration’s have reached us from Rasulullah (s) as to whether it is halaal or haraam and logic suggests that this halaal”.

      Imam of Ahl’ul Sunnah Abu Maleeka suggested ‘in times of trouble’ use a stick!’
      We read in Tafseer Durre Manthur Ayat Hars:
      “Abu Maleeka was asked whether it was permissible to practise sodomy with women. He replied ‘Last night I practised sodomy with my servant, penetration became difficult hence I sought the assistance of a stick”.

      Imam Malik believed sodomy with women was halaal

      We read in the following Sunni sources:

      • Ahkam al Qur’an Volume 1 page 352 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Gharab al Qur’an Volume 2 page 249 Ayat Hars
      • Tafseer Durre Manthur Volume 1 page 111, Ayat Hars
      • Fathul Bari Volume 8 page 190 Kitab Tafseer Ayat Hars

      Quoting verbatim from Ahkam al Qur’an:

      “Sahil asked Imam Malik ‘is sodomy with women permissible? Imam Malik replied ‘I just did this act and have just washed by sexual organs”.

      Imam Abu Hanifa’s esteemed student Ibn Mubarak was also a homosexual

      We also read in ‘Muhadarat al-‘udaba’, p. 199, Chapter 1, “Al hada al Saani” that:
      “Hakim Tabaristan made Abdullah bin Mubarak a Judge, who was addicted to the anus (Homosexual) he asked the Hakim ‘Sir I need some men who can help you” Hakim said I was aware of your need before this”.

      The Salaf deem it permissible to pray Salat behind a homosexual Imam
      We read in Sahih al Bukhari, p. 96, Kitab Bab ul Salaat, narrates a tradition from Zuhri [Sahih al-Bukhari, p. 96, 1375 AH print]:

      “The Imamate of a mukhanath at a time of necessity is Sahih”.

      Note: Arabic word “Mukhanath” means homosexual. This hadith has been removed from the English version of Bukhari, but exists in old copies of Arabic version. E.g. this 1375 Hijri print.

      So I think that the mullahs sodomizing little girls and boys are not wrong at all they are just following the Sunnah of the prophet and his companions.

      ISLAM’S CULTURE
      OF RAPE

      In Bradford, England, Channel 4 pulled a documentary about Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abusing white English girls, some as young as 11. Writer Theodore Dalrymple thinks that “thanks to their cultural inheritance, (Muslim) abuse of women is systematic rather than unsystematic as it is with the whites and blacks.” In France, grotesque reports about systematic gang rapes of French or “too Western” Muslim girls keep coming in. At the same time, European jails are getting filled up with Muslims imprisoned for robberies and all kinds of violent crimes, and Muslims bomb European civilians. You can see the mainstream media are struggling to make sense of all of this. That’s because they can’t, or don’t want to, see the obvious: This is exactly how an invading army would behave. Rape, pillage and bomb.

      I disagree that this has nothing to do with Islam. Muhammad himself had forced sex (rape) with several of his slave girls/concubines. This is perfectly allowed, both in the sunna and in the Koran. If you postulate that many of the Muslims in Europe view themselves as a conquering army and that European women are simply war booty, it all makes perfect sense and is in full accordance with Islamic law. And Muslims do follow their medieval religious laws, even today:

      What does rape, then, have to do with these religious conflicts? Unfortunately, everything. The Islamic legal manual ‘Umdat al-Salik, which carries the endorsement of Al-Azhar University, the most respected authority in Sunni Islam, stipulates:

      “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.”

      Why?

      So that they are free to become the concubines of their captors.

      The Qur’an permits Muslim men to have intercourse with their wives and their slave girls:

      Qur’an 4:23-24 “Forbidden to you are … married women, except those whom you own as slaves.”

      After one successful battle, Muhammad tells his men, “Go and take any slave girl.”

      He took one for himself also. After the notorious massacre of the Jewish Qurayzah tribe, he did it again. According to his earliest biographer, Ibn Ishaq, Muhammad
      “went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for [the men of Banu Qurayza] and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches.”

      After killing “600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900,” the Prophet of Islam took one of the widows he had just made, Rayhana bint Amr, as another concubine.

      Emerging victorious in another battle, according to a generally accepted Islamic tradition, Muhammad’s men present him with an ethical question: “We took women captives, and we wanted to do ‘azl [coitus interruptus] with them.” Muhammad told them:

      “It is better that you should not do it, for Allah has written whom He is going to create till the Day of Resurrection.’”

      When Muhammad says “it is better that you should not do it,” he’s referring to coitus interruptus, not to raping their captives. He takes that for granted.

      For non-Muslim women, they are in every respect — the way they walk, the way they talk, those bedroom eyes we all know so well — simply asking for it, and Muslim men have every right to do what they wish.

      It is not understood that Western women are not so much regarded by most Muslims as individuals, but as “their women,” the women who “belong” to hostile Infidels. They are booty, to be taken, just as the land of the Infidels someday will drop, it is believed, into Muslim hands — by demographic conquest rather than military conquest. It has worked in many parts of Africa; and if Muslims fail to reproduce even faster than they do, there is always the expedient of killing the remaining Infidels.

      All over France there are cases of rapes, by Muslim gangs, of French girls. In Australia, in 2000, Bankstown and Greenacre (in Sydney) had a succession of gang-rapes, in which the victims testified to the particularly gruesome details of being assaulted by a dozen or more men at a time, screaming at them for being “Aussies” or “Christians.” It made a big splash in Sydney, when the cases came to trial in 2002. Alan Jones, an Australian commentator, noted:

      “Let’s not mince words here — these are racist attacks against ordinary Australian girls carried out by out of control Muslim Lebanese….”

      The girls themselves all testified to the fact that the attacks were full of observations about, not race, but religion — and the confusion of Jones here is understandable. The Western world is still groping to understand something of which it had been so remarkably and indeed, in some ways so fortunately unaware; it is the attitudes engendered toward Infidels — a Frenchman who is beaten to death for trying to retrieve his daughter’s stolen bicycle, a mother and her year-old-child assaulted on an RER train near Louvres, the thousands of assaults which are a modern version of the rape and pillage that Muslim conquerors were permitted whenever they conquered Infidel lands. This is not mere crime, but ideologically-justified crime or rather, in Muslim eyes, attacks on Infidels scarcely qualify as crime.

      Have we forgotten the mass rapes, at the hands of Muslims (Turks, Kurds, and in the Syrian Desert, Arabs) of the Armenian women, those helpless “giavours,” in the first full-scale massacres in modern times, those of 1894-1895, and then the genocidal campaign that began in 1915 and went on for years?

      Have we all forgotten what happened to the Assyrian Christian women during the Assyrian massacres of 1933, when — just a few months after the British left — Muslim Iraqis had a high old time with their helpless Christian population?

      What about the rapes of the Christian women, kidnapped in Ramadi, Iraq — never to be returned to their husbands, and now the permanent property of the Muslims who kidnapped them?

      Shall one recall what happened to the Christian Maronites in Damur, at the hands of the PLO? What about the Copts, in Egypt? Or, during the Algerian War the mass rape of Christian and Jewish women by the FLN.

      The figures on Muslim rape of Western women in Europe are astounding. In Denmark and Norway, between 65% and 70% of all rapes are committed by Muslims, who as yet still less than 5% of the population. One local judge in Norway actually exonerated one rapist by accepting his defense that the victim’s dress was taken by him to mean that she was egging him on. Her dress was nothing special to Norwegians, but the judge found it to be unbearably provocative to this poor Muslim immigrant. A curious argument, is it not?

      The argument now seems to be: Western mores are offensive. Western women are cheap and offensive. We Muslims are here, here to stay, and we have a right to take advantage of this situation. It is our view of the matter that should prevail. Western goods, like the land on which we now live, belong to Allah and to the best of men — his Believers. Western women, too, essentially belong to us — our future booty. Western laws may “apply” but not in any sense that really counts or that we recognize. We recognize Islamic law, the sharia, and according to that we are simply exhibiting the attitudes toward Infidels that are drummed into us, that are right and according to the laws of Allah. Why should we act differently? Oh, and if we happen to act, as some of the Islamic websites tell us we can act, in accordance with the local laws — but only insofar as they do not contradict Islam — that is only because of darura, the doctrine of necessity — and that necessity, that darura, is of course only temporary.

      The Barbarians and Mongols have returned!

      ANIMAL LOVING MUSLIMS:

      ISLAM & ZOOPHILIA

      Zoophilia, from the Greek Ζωον (zôon, “animal”) and φιλία (philia, “friendship” or “love”), is a paraphilia, defined as an affinity or sexual attraction by a human to a non-human animal. Such individuals are called zoophiles. The more recent terms zoosexual and zoosexuality describe the full spectrum of human/animal orientation. A separate term, bestiality (more common in mainstream usage and frequently but incorrectly seen as a synonym; often misspelled as “beastiality”), refers to human/animal sexual activity. To avoid confusion about the meaning of zoophilia — which may refer to the affinity/attraction, paraphilia, or sexual activity — this article uses zoophilia for the former, and zoosexual activity for the sexual act. The two terms are independent: not all sexual acts with animals are performed by zoophiles; and not all zoophiles are sexually interested in animals.

      Pakistan has banned content on more than a dozen websites because of “offensive” and “blasphemous” material, while they themselves rank No. 1 for certain sex-related search terms, including “child sex,” “rape sex,” “animal sex,” “camel sex,” “donkey sex,” “dog sex,” and “horse sex”.[1]

      NON-ISLAMIC ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS

      From non-Islamic Abrahamic religious scriptures, it is easy to see that bestiality is considered immoral.

      “‘Do not have sexual relations with an animal and defile yourself with it. A woman must not present herself to an animal to have sexual relations with it; that is a perversion.

      Leviticus 18:23 NIV

      “Cursed is anyone who has sexual relations with any animal.” Then all the people shall say, “Amen!”

      Deuteronomy 27:21 NIV

      There are other passages within the Torah/Old Testament which call for the death penalty to be inflicted. This is harsh but that does not concern us. What concerns us is the fact that non-Islamic Abrahamic religions strictly forbid sexual acts between humans and other species, and so do secular western laws in general. Therefore the claim that the West “allows men to have sex with animals” is proven to be false.

      PEDOPHILIA & BESTIALITY

      Some may lump together homosexuality and bestiality as both constituting “sexual immorality”. However, there is a crucial difference between the two. A homosexual act takes place between two consenting adults, but an animal cannot give its consent.
      In this sense, bestiality is akin to pedophilia, something which Islam unashamedly permits. Indeed bestiality is viewed by many in the West as animal abuse.
      Interestingly, one study has found that children who have been subjected to sexual abuse are more likely than non-abused children to partake in bestiality.

      Although it is difficult to obtain information about sexual behavior in children and adolescents, especially sexual behavior with animals, Friedrich (1997) provided some information on this issue with data from his Child Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI).
      Caregivers of 1,114 children ages 2–12 who had not been abused and caregivers of 512 sexually abused children in the same age range reported on a variety of sexual or sexualized behaviors in the children, including whether the child “touches animals’ sex parts.” (Note: The reporting caregivers of the sexually abused children were not the perpetrators of the abuse.) The children were divided into three age groups: ages 2–5, 6–9, and 10–12. The queried behavior was relatively infrequent, but it was clear that in the two older groups, sexually abused children were more likely to display the behavior than nonabused children.

      Although the behavior appears to decline among sexually abused 10- to 12-year-olds, one might speculate that the decrease is accounted for, in part, by a greater secretiveness in older children in acting out sexually with animals. The decrease may also be related to older children’s transferring their inappropriate sexual activity from animal to human victims.

      Further evidence for the relation between sexual abuse victimization and bestiality is provided by Wherry and colleagues (1995). They administered the CSBI to caretakers of 24 boys ages 6–12 who were psychiatric inpatients. Eight of these boys had been sexually abused. “Touches animals’ sex parts” was reported for 50 percent of abused boys but none of nonabused boys (p<0.01).
      Bestiality and Abuse in the 21st Century
      The NPOAA Review

      IN THE ISLAMIC WORLD

      AFGHANISTAN

      In a society where homosexuals and adulterers are stoned to death for "sexual immorality" you would expect a similar outcome for someone caught having sex with an animal. Surprisingly this is not the case.
      An Afghan soldier was detained by police after being caught having sex with a donkey in southeastern Afghanistan, a police officer told AFP.
      The soldier was discovered with the donkey in an abandoned house in a small village of Gardez, the capital of Paktia province, last week, a local police officer said.
      "He was caught in the act by a small boy who immediately told police about what he had seen and police arrested him in action," the Gardez-based officer told AFP, requesting anonymity.
      The soldier claimed he committed the act because he did not have enough money to get married.
      After being caught with the donkey in a village about 100km south of the capital Kabul, he was jailed for four days and then released without charge.
      According to tradition in south and southeastern Afghanistan, a suitor must pay around $US5,000 ($A6,800) to the parents of the girl he wishes to marry.
      Soldier caught with his pants down
      The Age, March 16, 2004
      Could it be that the soldier was released without charge because there is nothing in the Qur'an that prohibits bestiality?

      PALESTINE

      In 1923, the Director of Health in the British Mandate government in Palestine sent out a questionnaire to his Principal Medical and Health Officers in the country, asking them to report on various sexual practices and attitudes among the Muslim Arab population.
      As a result, the British discovered that the Muslim Arabs engaged in bestiality.
      The Nablus officer finds sodomy and "similar vices" "not uncommon in some of the towns but less so in the villages where…bestiality is by no mean unknown" and "immorality…rather lightly regarded" in those villages that are closer to the larger towns. He comments, "in the villages there seems to be curiously little feeling against bestiality which I have heard admitted in a very airy way on more than one occasion. Sodomy is considered disgraceful but not I think more so than ordinary immorality" (III).
      "Unnatural Vices" or Unnatural Rule? The Case of a Sex Questionnaire and the British Mandate
      Ellen L. Fleischmann, Jerusalem Quarterly File, Issue 10, 2000

      PAKISTAN

      In Southern Punjab, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Sindh and Balochistan, sex with animals is a common practice among rural youths and considered a rite of passage into adulthood.
      In southern Punjab, much of NWFP, Sindh and Balochistan sodomy and bestiality are common among rural youths. In fact, he caught two boys trying to rape a goat in the vicinity of the mazar of Hazrat Sultan Bahu. The punishment meted out to them was 10 blows with a chhittar (shoe) each on their butts. They protested however that in many rural areas having sex with an animal was considered a rite of passage on the way to becoming full members of the male society!
      Desegregation of the sexes and promiscuity
      Ishtiaq Ahmed (associate professor of political science at Stockholm University), Daily Times, June 27, 2006

      DONKEY KILLED AFTER BEING RAPED

      In June 2011, a male who was caught having sex with another man's donkey was fined Rs 50,000. This fine was not imposed for having sex with an animal, but for committing adultery. The raped donkey was labelled a 'kari' (an adultress) and eventually honor killed by its owner.

      Incredible though it may sound, a donkey was declared 'Kari' and shot dead here in a remote area on Monday. The Jirga imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the alleged 'Karo'.
      The reports said that in Village Ghahi Khan Jatoi, a villager Ghazi Khan alias Malang shot dead his donkey on being 'Kari' with Sikandar Ali alias Deedo. He attempted to kill Sikander too but the alleged Karo managed to escape and surrendered himself to an influential person of the area.

      Sources said the influential person summoned both the parties and imposed 110,000 rupees fine on the Karo. They said Sikander and his family were forced to pay Rs 50,000 on the spot and the remaining amount in two installments.
      The sources added that the alleged Karo pleaded innocence at the Jirga, but the Jirga members paid no attention to it. Sikander's family said he paid Rs 50,000 to save his life otherwise he would have been killed.
      Donkey declared 'Kari' killed
      The News International, July 19, 2011

      Pakistan ranks number 1 for such varied search terms as "child sex," "rape sex," "animal sex," "camel sex," "donkey sex," "dog sex," and "horse sex".
      The Muslim country, which has banned content on at least 17 websites to block offensive and blasphemous material, is the world's leader in online searches for pornographic material
      . . .
      Google ranks Pakistan No. 1 in the world in searches for pornographic terms, outranking every other country in the world in searches per person for certain sex-related content.
      Pakistan is top dog in searches per-person for "horse sex" since 2004, "donkey sex" since 2007, "rape pictures" between 2004 and 2009, "rape sex" since 2004, "child sex" between 2004 and 2007 and since 2009, "animal sex" since 2004 and "dog sex" since 2005, according to Google Trends and Google Insights, features of Google that generate data based on popular search terms.

      The country also is tops — or has been No. 1 — in searches for "sex," "camel sex," "rape video," "child sex video" and some other searches that can't be printed here.
      No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan
      Kelli Morgan, Fox News, July 13, 2010

      OTHER COUNTRIES & BESTIALITY — RELATED SEARCHES

      Pakistani Muslims are not alone in their search for porn.
      Google, the world's most popular Internet search engine, has found in a survey that mostly Muslim states seek access to sex-related websites and Pakistan tops the list. Google found that of the top 10 countries – searching for sex-related sites – six were Muslim, with Pakistan on the top. The other Muslim countries are Egypt at number 2, Iran at 4, Morocco at 5, Saudi Arabia at 7 and Turkey at 8. Non-Muslim states are Vietnam at 3, India at 6, Philippines at 9 and Poland at 10.
      Pakistan most sex-starved
      Khalid Hasan, Daily Times, May 17, 2006
      Here are the Muslim countries and how they placed in the top five world ranking of various bestiality-related internet search terms:[8]
      Pig Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Donkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Dog Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 3)
      Cat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Egypt (No. 3) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Horse Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Turkey (No. 3)
      Cow Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Iran (No. 2) Saudi Arabia (No. 4)
      Goat Sex: Pakistan (No. 1)
      Animal Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Morocco (No. 2) Iran (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Snake Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Malaysia (No. 3) Indonesia (No. 4) Egypt (No. 5)
      Monkey Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Indonesia (No. 3) Malaysia (No. 4)
      Bear Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Saudi Arabia (No. 2)
      Elephant Sex: Pakistan (No. 1) Egypt (No. 3) United Arab Emirates (No. 4) Malaysia (No. 5)
      Fox Sex: Saudi Arabia (No. 1) Turkey (No. 4)

      MIDDLE EAST

      Bestiality is common among boys of tribal Arab cultures.
      Miner and DeVos (1960) comment that amongst Arab tribal cultures, "Bestiality with goats, sheep, or camels provides another outlet. These practices are not approved but they are recognized as common among boys." Havelock-Ellis [note 52] states "The Arabs, according to Kocher, chiefly practice bestiality with goats, sheep and mares. The Annamites, according to Mondiere, commonly employ sows and (more especially the young women) dogs."
      Historical And Cultural Perspectives On Zoophilia
      Serving History
      There is also a certain saying which remains popular among the Arabs:
      The Arabs have never taken quite so condemnatory an attitude towards the practice, and indeed a popular Arab saying had it that

      "The pilgrimage to Mecca is not complete without copulating with the camel."[9]

      SUDAN

      In February 2006, a man caught having sex with a neighbor's goat was not punished, but ordered by the council of elders to pay the neighbor a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) and marry the animal because he "used it as his wife".
      A Sudanese man has been forced to take a goat as his "wife", after he was caught having sex with the animal.
      The goat's owner, Mr Alifi, said he surprised the man with his goat and took him to a council of elders.
      They ordered the man, Mr Tombe, to pay a dowry of 15,000 Sudanese dinars ($50) to Mr Alifi.
      "We have given him the goat, and as far as we know they are still together," Mr Alifi said.
      Sudan man forced to 'marry' goat
      BBC News, February 24,2006

      MOROCCO
      Morocco is an Islamic country, with 98.7% of the population Muslims.[10] The following is taken from a paper on sexuality in Morocco written by Nadia Kadiri, M.D., and Abderrazak Moussaïd, M.D., with Abdelkrim Tirraf, M.D., and Abdallah Jadid, M.D. Translated by Raymond J. Noonan, Ph.D., and Sandra Almeida.[11]
      In the rural world, zoophilia is still very widespread and not blameworthy. With masturbation, it constitutes an obligatory passage in the adolescent male's apprenticeship of sexuality.
      The operative phrase is 'obligatory passage in the adolescent male's apprenticeship of sexuality'. Obligatory. It means in rural Morocco, Muslim males must have sexual intercourse with animals as part of their sexual apprenticeship.
      Also according to the scholars Allen Edwardes and Robert Masters, Ph.D, FAACS, the Muslims of Morocco believe that sexual intercourse with donkeys "make the penis grow big and strong" and masturbation is often scorned by them in favor of bestiality.[12]

      SLAMIC SCRIPTURE

      The above paper also says "it is prohibited without question by the Shariâ". But is this alleged prohibition within the Shari'ah extracted (as it must be) from the Qur'an and Hadith, or has this fiqh been derived using external non-Islamic sources?

      QURAN

      In contrast with what secular and non-Islamic religious sources say about bestiality, this is what the Qur'an has to say on the subject:
      That's right – absolutely, positively nothing. Unlike the Qur'an's clear-cut rulings on the morality of homosexuality, Polygamy, rape, and pedophilia, the permissibility of bestiality seems to have been left open to 'interpretation.'
      If Islamic teachings were truly opposed to such a practice, then this omission is somewhat surprising when you consider that, historically, bestiality was indigenously accepted in the Middle-East.[13]

      HADITH

      There is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs. The following hadith is taken from the Sunnah Abu-Dawud collection, not Bukari or Muslim.
      Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: If anyone has sexual intercourse with an animal, kill him and kill it along with him. I (Ikrimah) said: I asked him (Ibn Abbas): What offence can be attributed to the animal/ He replied: I think he (the Prophet) disapproved of its flesh being eaten when such a thing had been done to it.
      Abu Dawud 38:4449
      Sounds too good to be true, doesn't it? And it is. Just look at the very next hadith.
      Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: There is no prescribed punishment for one who has sexual intercourse with an animal.
      Abu Dawud 38:4450
      This is a very clear contradiction. How can one hadith say kill the person committing bestiality, and the very next one say there is no prescribed punishment for the same person? Both statements cannot be true.
      What's worse; these two contradictory hadiths (transmitted through different isnad) have been attributed to the same person. Abu Dawud himself had said the former of the two hadith is "not strong" and the latter further "weakens" it.[14]
      From the above, we can gather that Robert Masters had correctly stated, "bestiality was not specifically prohibited by the Prophet,"[9] so there is little wonder that Islamists generally shy away from mentioning Abu Dawud 38:4449 in their pronouncements on bestiality.

      SAHIH (AUTHENTIC) HADITH

      As we have previously mentioned, there is no prohibition against bestiality to be found within the two Sahihs (Authentic). However there does exist a certain hadith and commentary by the renowned Islamic scholar al-Nawawi, which is of interest.
      The following narration does not exist in the English translations of Sahih Muslim, but a similar (but sanitized version) appears in: Sahih Muslim 3:684

      و حدثني ‏ ‏زهير بن حرب ‏ ‏وأبو غسان المسمعي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثناه ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏وابن بشار ‏ ‏قالوا حدثنا ‏ ‏معاذ بن هشام ‏ ‏قال حدثني ‏ ‏أبي ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏ومطر ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏الحسن ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي رافع ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي هريرة ‏ ‏أن نبي الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏إذا جلس بين ‏ ‏شعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ثم جهدها فقد وجب عليه الغسل ‏
      ‏وفي حديث ‏ ‏مطر ‏ ‏وإن لم ينزل ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏زهير ‏ ‏من بينهم بين ‏ ‏أشعبها ‏ ‏الأربع ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن عمرو بن عباد بن جبلة ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن أبي عدي ‏ ‏ح ‏ ‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن المثنى ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏وهب بن جرير ‏ ‏كلاهما ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏قتادة ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏مثله غير أن في حديث ‏ ‏شعبة ‏ ‏ثم اجتهد ولم يقل وإن لم ينزل ‏

      Narrated by Zuhair Ibn Harb, narrated by Ghasan Al-Masma'i, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Ibn Bashar, who said that it was narrated by Muath Ibn Hisham, narrated by Abu Qatada, narrated by Mattar, narrated by Al-Hassan, narrated by Abu Rab'i, narrated by Abu Huraira who said:
      "The prophet — peace be upon him — said, 'If one sits between a woman's four parts (shu'biha Al-arba') and then fatigues her, then it necessitates that he wash.'
      In the hadith of Mattar it is added 'even if he does not ejaculate (yunzil).' Zuhair narrated among them using the phrase 'Ashba'iha Al-arba'. It was also narrated by Muhammad Ibn Umar Ibn Ibad Ibn Jablah, narrated Muhammad Ibn Abi Uday, narrated by Muhammad Ibn Al-Mathny, narrated by Wahb Ibn Jarir who both related from Shu'bah who narrated from Qatada who gave this same chain of transmission, except that in the hadith of Shu'bah it has the phrase 'then he labored' but did not have the phrase 'even if he does not ejaculate.'
      Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525

      IMAM AL-NAWAWI (1234 — 1278 AD)

      Below is a short bio of al-Nawawi, whose commentary of Sahih Muslim is second only to Ibn Hajar's commentary of Sahih Bukhari.[15]
      Imam Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi was born in the village of Nawa in Southern Syria, Nawawi spent most of his life in Damascus where he lived in a simple manner, devoted to Allah, engaging single-mindedly in worship, study, writing and teaching various Islamic sciences. The life of this world seems scarcely to have impinged upon him. He was a versatile and extremely dedicated scholar whose breadth of learning was matched by its depth.
      Imam Nawawi died at the young age of 44 years, leaving behind him numerous works of great importance, the most famous of these being:
      • al-Arba'un Nabawi (An-Nawawis Forty Hadith)
      • Riyadhus saleheen
      • al-Maqasid (Al-Nawawi's Manual of Islam).
      • Kitab al-Adhkar,
      • Minhaj al-Talibin (a main reference for Shafi'i fiqh)
      • Shar' Sahih Muslim (he was the first to arrange the sahih of Muslim in the now familiar categories)
      Although best known for his works in hadith, Yahya ibn Sharaf al-Nawawi (d. 676/1277) was also the Imam of the later Shafi'i school of Jurisprudence, and widely acknowledged as the intellectual heir to Imam Shafi'i. He was a renowned scholar and jurist who dedicated his life to the pursuit of Islamic learning.
      About Imam al-Nawawi

      COMMENTARY
      صحيح مسلم بشرح النووي ‏ ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو غَسَّان الْمِسْمَعِيّ ) ‏ ‏هُوَ بِفَتْحِ الْغَيْن الْمُعْجَمَة وَتَشْدِيد السِّين الْمُهْمَلَة , وَيَجُوز صَرْفه وَتَرْكُ صَرْفه . وَالْمِسْمَعِيّ بِكَسْرِ الْمِيم الْأُولَى وَفَتْح الثَّانِي , وَاسْمه مَالِك بْن عَبْد الْوَاحِد , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَانه مَرَّات , لَكِنِّي أُنَبِّه عَلَيْهِ وَعَلَى مِثْله لِطُولِ الْعَهْد بِهِ , كَمَا شَرَطْتهُ فِي الْخُطْبَة . ‏
      ‏قَوْله : ( أَبُو رَافِع عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَة ) ‏ ‏اِسْم أَبِي رَافِع : ( نُفَيْع ) وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ أَيْضًا . ‏ ‏قَوْله صَلَّى اللَّه عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : ( إِذَا قَعَدَ بَيْن شُعَبهَا الْأَرْبَع ثُمَّ جَهَدهَا ) ‏ ‏وَفِي رِوَايَة ( أَشْعُبهَا ) اِخْتَلَفَ الْعُلَمَاء فِي الْمُرَاد بِالشُّعَبِ الْأَرْبَع , فَقِيلَ : هِيَ الْيَدَانِ وَالرِّجْلَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالْفَخِذَانِ , وَقِيلَ : الرِّجْلَانِ وَالشَّفْرَانِ , وَاخْتَارَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض أَنَّ الْمُرَاد شُعَب الْفَرْج الْأَرْبَع , وَالشُّعَب النَّوَاحِي وَاحِدَتهَا شُعْبَة , وَأَمَّا مَنْ قَالَ : ( أَشْعُبِهَا ) , فَهُوَ جَمْع شُعَب . وَمَعْنَى ( جَهَدَهَا ) حَفَرَهَا كَذَا قَالَهُ الْخَطَّابِيُّ وَقَالَ غَيْره : بَلَغَ مَشَقَّتهَا , يُقَال : جَهِدْته وَأَجْهَدْته بَلَغْت مَشَقَّته , قَالَ الْقَاضِي عِيَاض رَحِمَهُ اللَّه تَعَالَى : الْأَوْلَى أَنْ يَكُون جَهَدَهَا بِمَعْنَى بَلَغَ جَهْده فِي الْعَمَل فِيهَا , وَالْجَهْد الطَّاقَة , وَهُوَ إِشَارَة إِلَى الْحَرَكَة وَتَمَكُّن صُورَة الْعَمَل , وَهُوَ نَحْو قَوْله مِنْ حَفَرَهَا أَيْ كَدّهَا بِحَرَكَتِهِ . وَإِلَّا فَأَيّ مَشَقَّة بَلَغَ بِهَا فِي ذَلِكَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . وَمَعْنَى الْحَدِيث أَنَّ إِيجَاب الْغُسْل لَا يَتَوَقَّف عَلَى نُزُول الْمَنِيّ بَلْ مَتَى غَابَتْ الْحَشَفَة فِي الْفَرْج وَجَبَ الْغُسْل عَلَى الرَّجُل وَالْمَرْأَة , وَهَذَا لَا خِلَاف فِيهِ الْيَوْم , وَقَدْ كَانَ فِيهِ خِلَاف لِبَعْضِ الصَّحَابَة وَمَنْ بَعْدهمْ , ثُمَّ اِنْعَقَدَ الْإِجْمَاع عَلَى مَا ذَكَرْنَاهُ , وَقَدْ تَقَدَّمَ بَيَان هَذَا . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ الْحَشَفَة فِي دُبُر اِمْرَأَة , أَوْ دُبُر رَجُل , أَوْ فَرْج بَهِيمَة , أَوْ دُبُرهَا , وَجَبَ الْغُسْل سَوَاء كَانَ الْمَوْلَج فِيهِ حَيًّا أَوْ مَيِّتًا , صَغِيرًا أَوْ كَبِيرًا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ قَصْد أَمْ عَنْ نِسْيَان , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مُخْتَارًا أَوْ مُكْرَهًا , أَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَهُ وَهُوَ نَائِم , وَسَوَاء اِنْتَشَرَ الذَّكَر أَمْ لَا , وَسَوَاء كَانَ مَخْتُونًا أَمْ أَغْلَف , فَيَجِب الْغُسْل فِي كُلّ هَذِهِ الصُّوَر عَلَى الْفَاعِل وَالْمَفْعُول بِهِ إِلَّا إِذَا كَانَ الْفَاعِل أَوْ الْمَفْعُول بِهِ صَبِيًّا أَوْ صَبِيَّة فَإِنَّهُ لَا يُقَال وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ لِأَنَّهُ لَيْسَ مُكَلَّفًا , وَلَكِنْ يُقَال صَارَ جُنُبًا فَإِنْ كَانَ مُمَيِّزًا وَجَبَ عَلَى الْوَلِيّ أَنْ يَأْمُرهُ بِالْغُسْلِ كَمَا يَأْمُرهُ بِالْوُضُوءِ , فَإِنْ صَلَّى مِنْ غَيْر غُسْلٍ لَمْ تَصِحّ صَلَاته , وَإِنْ لَمْ يَغْتَسِل حَتَّى بَلَغَ وَجَبَ عَلَيْهِ الْغُسْل , وَإِنْ اِغْتَسَلَ فِي الصِّبَى ثُمَّ بَلَغَ لَمْ يَلْزَمهُ إِعَادَة الْغُسْل . قَالَ أَصْحَابنَا : وَالِاعْتِبَار فِي الْجِمَاع بِتَغْيِيبِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْ صَحِيح الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ , فَإِذَا غَيَّبَهَا بِكَمَالِهَا تَعَلَّقَتْ بِهِ جَمِيع الْأَحْكَام , وَلَا يُشْتَرَط تَغْيِيب جَمِيع الذَّكَر بِالِاتِّفَاقِ . وَلَوْ غَيَّبَ بَعْض الْحَشَفَة لَا يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام بِالِاتِّفَاقِ إِلَّا وَجْهًا شَاذًّا ذَكَرَهُ بَعْض أَصْحَابنَا أَنَّ حُكْمه حُكْم جَمِيعهَا , وَهَذَا الْوَجْه غَلَط مُنْكَر مَتْرُوك , وَأَمَّا إِذَا كَانَ الذَّكَر مَقْطُوعًا فَإِنْ بَقِيَ مِنْهُ دُون الْحَشَفَة لَمْ يَتَعَلَّق بِهِ شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام , وَإِنْ كَانَ الْبَاقِي قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَحَسْب تَعَلَّقَتْ الْأَحْكَام بِتَغْيِيبِهِ بِكَمَالِهِ , وَإِنْ كَانَ زَائِدًا عَلَى قَدْر الْحَشَفَة فَفِيهِ وَجْهَانِ مَشْهُورَانِ لِأَصْحَابِنَا أَصَحّهمَا أَنَّ الْأَحْكَام تَتَعَلَّق بِقَدْرِ الْحَشَفَة مِنْهُ , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَتَعَلَّق شَيْء مِنْ الْأَحْكَام إِلَّا بِتَغْيِيبِ جَمِيع الْبَاقِي . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ لَفَّ عَلَى ذَكَرِهِ خِرْقَة وَأَوْلَجَهُ فِي فَرْج اِمْرَأَة فَفِيهِ ثَلَاثَة أَوْجُه لِأَصْحَابِنَا مِنْهَا وَالْمَشْهُور أَنَّهُ يَجِب عَلَيْهِمَا الْغُسْل , وَالثَّانِي لَا يَجِب لِأَنَّهُ أَوْلَجَ فِي خِرْقَة , وَالثَّالِث إِنْ كَانَتْ الْخِرْقَة غَلِيظَة تَمْنَع وُصُول اللَّذَّة وَالرُّطُوبَة لَمْ يَجِب الْغُسْل . وَإِلَّا وَجَبَ . وَاللَّهُ أَعْلَم . ‏ ‏وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت الْمَرْأَة ذَكَرَ بَهِيمَة وَجَبَ عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل , وَلَوْ اسْتَدْخَلَت ذَكَرًا مَقْطُوعًا فَوَجْهَانِ أَصَحّهمَا يَجِب عَلَيْهَا الْغُسْل

      Commentary of Imam Al-Nawawi on the Hadith
      The saying of the prophet — peace be upon him- 'When he sits between her fours parts) mostly its a home animal (shu'biha Al-arba) and has intercourse with her then fatigues her'

      In another narration the word 'Ashu'biha' is used. The scholars have disagreed about the intended meaning of 'shu'biha Al-arba' (the fours) for some said that it means the arms and the legs, while others have said that it refers to the legs and thighs, and other said it means the legs and the edge of the pubic area. Al-Qadi Ayad chose the meaning of the four areas surrounding the vagina. The word (Shu'b) means areas, its singular form being (Shu'bah). As for those who say (Ashba'iha) that is the plural of the word (Shu'b).
      The word Aj-hada-ha (fatigue her) means to plow her, which was also stated by Al-Khatabi. Others have said it means to make her reach exhaustion as in the phrase 'she made him toil and labor till he was exhausted'. Al-Qadi Ayad — may Allah rest his soul- said 'Primarily, the word (Jahada'ha) means that the man exerted his effort working in a woman, where the word (Juh'd) means energy and refers to motion by describing the type of work. This is similar to his (the prophet) saying 'he who plowed her' meaning he who penetrated her by his motion. Otherwise, what other fatigue could a man experience because of her, and Allah knows best.

      The meaning of the hadith is that the necessity to wash is not limited to when semen is ejaculated, rather it is when the penile head (Hash-fa, lit. "the head of the male member," i.e. head of the penis) penetrates the vagina, then it is necessary for the man and the woman to wash. There is no disagreement on this today, even though there was disagreement on this by some of the early companions and others later. However, an agreement was later reached and this is what we have shown and presented previously.
      Our companions have said that if the penile head has penetrated a woman's anus, or a man's anus, or an animal's vagina or its anus then it is necessary to wash whether the one being penetrated is alive or dead, young or old, whether it was done intentionally or absentmindedly, whether it was done willfully or forcefully.

      This also applies if the woman places the male member inside her while the man is asleep, whether the penis is erect or not, whether the penis is circumcised or uncircumcised. All these situations require that the person committing the act and the one the act is committed on must wash themselves, unless the person committing the act or the person the act is committed on is a young male or female. In that case it cannot be said that the person must wash, for they do not have the responsibility, rather it is said that this person is in a state of impurity. If that person can discern (the sexual act) then his guardian can command him to wash just as he commands him to perform the ablution washing for prayers. For if he prays without washing, his prayer has not been performed correctly; likewise if he doesn't wash after he reaches puberty he must be forced to wash. If he washed as a youth and then reaches puberty, then he does not have to repeat the washing.

      Our companions have said that intercourse occurs when a healthy male's penile head completely penetrates (an orifice), as has been unanimously agreed. Thus, when the penile head has completely disappeared (inside the orifice), then all the regulations concerning washing apply. It is unanimously agreed that it is not necessary that the entire penile shaft penetrate to apply the regulations of washing. If part of the penile head penetrates, then the regulations of washing are not imposed as is agreed, except by an odd few of our companions who said that even in this case all the regulations of washing apply. However, this opinion is wrong, rejected and abandoned. If the male member was severed and what remained was less than the length of the penile head, then none of the washing regulations apply. If the part remaining was equal in length to the penile head length then that part must completely penetrate for the regulation of washing to apply. If the part remaining was greater in length to the penile head length then there are two famous opinions for our companions. The most correct is that if the portion that penetrates is equal to the length of the penile head, then the regulations for washing apply. The other opinion is that none of the regulations for washing apply until the entire remaining length of the penile shaft completely penetrates and Allah knows best.
      If a man wraps a sheath around his male member and then ejaculates inside a woman's vagina, then there are three opinions from our companions. The most famous is that the man must wash. The second is that he does not have to wash because he ejaculated inside the sheath. The third is that if the sheath is thick and prevents climax and wetness (in the vagina) then washing is not necessary, otherwise it is necessary and Allah knows best.
      If a woman inserts (in her vagina) an animal's penis she must wash, and if she inserts a detached penis (thakaran maktu-an, lit. "a severed male member") there are two opinions; the most correct is that she must wash.

      Sahih Muslim – Book of Menstruation – hadith #525 – Commentary

      ISLAMIC SCHOLARS

      Some Sunni Islamic scholars have ruled that bestiality does not invalidate the hajj or ones fast.
      ولو وطئ بهيمة لا يفسد حجه

      "If he had sexual intercourse with an animal, that will not make his hajj void"
      Abu Bakar al-Kashani (d. 587 H), Badaye al-Sanae, Vol. 2, p. 216
      "Sex with animals, dead people and masturbation, does not invalidate one's fast provided ejaculation does not occur"
      Allamah Hassan bin Mansoor Qadhi Khan, Fatawa Qadhi Khan, Page 820
      Others have said it is halal.
      لقد كانت نكاح الحيوانات قبل البعثه منتشره وتروى كثير من الروايات انها حلال لكنها مكروه والاحوط وجوبا ترك هذه العاده التي تسبب الأذى النفسي ويجب عليك الاعتراف لصاحب الاغنام ودفع قيمتها لمالكها

      Sex with animals before the mission (Islam) was wide spread and many narrations are narrated that it is halal but makrooh (disliked). And on the compulsory precaution one should abandon this practice that may cause self harm. And you must admit this to the owner of the sheep and pay the owner.
      Sex with animals Fatwa
      al-Uzma Seyyid Ali al-Sistani

      CONCLUSION

      From all of the above, we can certainly see that, unlike the West, Islamic societies do not universally harbor negative attitudes towards bestiality. Many Muslims seek out gratification or are indifferent to this perversion, and in some cases it is even openly promoted and made obligatory.
      This is all in stark contrast with their attitudes towards homosexuality and their allowance of pedophilia. Therefore to claim that the West without the guidance of Islam has allowed bestiality is not only false, but hypocritical when you consider that this perversion, alongside pedophilia, is left largely unhindered by the Islamic clerisy in their societies and runs rampant among followers of Islam.
      Aside from their own embarrassment, we can also see that there is little basis for any Shari'ah prohibition of bestiality/zoophilia as the Qur'an and the Sahih Hadiths (Bukhari and Muslim) do not prohibit this unnatural practice, furthermore the references we have examined outside of the two Sahihs are considered weak.

      References

      1. ↑ Kelli Morgan – No. 1 Nation in Sexy Web Searches? Call it Pornistan – Fox News, July 13, 2010
      2. ↑ Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper
      3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Bestiality – Dictionary.com
      4. ↑ Collins English Dictionary – Complete & Unabridged 10th Edition 2009
      5. ↑ Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary, © 2007 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
      6. ↑ Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
      7. ↑ Rebecca F. Wisch – Overview of State Bestiality Laws – Animal Legal & Historical Center, 2008 (updated 2010)
      8. ↑ Watcher – Pakistan: Muslims Are Sex-Starved Surfers, With Bestial Interests – Eye On The World, May 18, 2006
      9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Robert E.L. Masters – Forbidden Sexual Behavior and Morality – The Julian Press, 1st edition 1966,
      10. ↑ Africa :: Morocco – The online Factbook
      11. ↑ Read the full text here.
      12. ↑ Allen Edwardes and R.E.L. Masters – Cradle of Erotica (pp. 223-224) – Bantam Paperback; New Ed edition (1977), ISBN 0553103016
      13. ↑ Judith Worell – Encyclopedia of women and gender: Volume 1 (p. 298) – Academic Press; 1 edition, September 27, 2001, ISBN 9780122272455
      14. ↑ Dr. Ahmad Shafaat – Ahadith About Rajm – Islamic Perspectives, March 6, 2005
      15. ↑ ON TASAWWUF Imam Nawawi (d. 676) -

      Liked by 1 person

      • I didn’t even read a fourth of that because you’re just proving my point: You people are hypocrites.
        You’re only looking at what a feeble minority did and not at the rest of the Muslims.
        The Islamic religion promotes love and companionship but it also promotes justice, in my opinion, a man who stole is a man who defied the ten commandments of God and is a sinner no matter how you look at it, I’m not saying he should have his hand cut off since that’s simply extremist and the rest of the islamic countries have abandoned that practice, but he should also get a worse punishment than prison or a find.
        Besides you have your own faults too, rapists/murderers/criminals of all kinds are present in every country and in every religion.
        Also don’t forget that anything the Saudian government has done was done before by your countries a couple of centuries back and nobody batted an eye.
        So please before you write some bullshit about our prophet, please JUST READ THE Q’URAN OR ASK A PRIEST FOR SOME FACTS.
        DON’T WRITE BULLSHIT AND THINK YOU FUCKING KNOW ANYTHING YOU PIECE OF SHIT BECAUSE IT’S IDIOTIC HYPOCRITES LIKE YOU WHO MAKE THIS WORLD AN AWFULL PLACE!!

        Like

      • These idiots are Mistranslating words. They are NOT speaking of having “anal sex” when speaking of “kabool”, this simply means regular vaginal sex but from the back side. This whole thing is written by a pervert. Next, he-or she- will be thinking he has to ride in a trains “anus” when told to ride in the “kaboos”” Stupid nut.

        Liked by 1 person

      • And just for an example of this authors sickness- That is a photo of a hand in a hospital that was caught in a food processor – yet he tries to use it as an example of someone’s “fingers cut off” punishment.. Every one of those supposed “hadiths” are misrepresentations of the whole paragraph wherein it is condemned as wrong- something NOT TO BE DONE.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s